Suchergebnisse

1. Plato's and Aristotle's theory of eide -- 2. From descriptive psychology to transcendentally pure phenomenology -- 3. From the phenomenology of transcendental consciousness to that of monadological intersubjectivity -- 4. From monadological intersubjectivity to the historical a priori constitutive of all meaning -- 5. The unwarranted historical presuppositions guiding the fundamental ontological and deconstructive criticisms of transcendental philosophy.

Many of the contributions to this volume are based on research originally presented at the historic first meeting in the United States of Japanese and American phenomenologists that took place at Seattle University in the Summer of 1991. In addition, other contributions have been added in order to supplement and complement the themes of the work presented at this meeting. Owing both to the vagaries of fate and the finitude of time, the publication of these essays has taken much longer than was originally intended. Nevertheless, this delay is more than offset by the inclusion in one volume of both phenomenological thematics and phenomenological authors who do not usually appear together

The volume contains contributions from major interpreters of Husserl's phenomenology. Among the topics investigated are phenomenology and ontology, the phenomenology of the ego, the phenomenology of logic, the phenomenology of the life-world, and phenomenology and science. `These essays remind us that what Husserl proposed to the philosophical community was a program of research rather than a systemization of results. One simply does not read Husserl as one reads, say, Sartre. To take Husserl as a teacher is to agree to do philosophy rather than to engage in the sort of activity well described as `philosophy appreciation'. To understand Husserl is to do what the contributors to this volume have done, to appropriate his work and to extend that work in his terms and in theirs.' (from the Preface)

This book reassesses the phenomenological `controversy' between Husserl and Heidegger over the proper status of the phenomenon of intentionality. It seeks to determine whether Heidegger's hermeneutical critique of intentionality is sensitive to Husserl's reflective account of its `Sachen selbst'. Hopkins argues that Heidegger's critique is directed toward the `cogito' modality of intentionality, and therefore, passes over its `non-actional', or `horizonal', dimension in Husserl's phenomenology. As a result of this, he concludes that Heidegger misinterprets Husserl's account of the intentional `immanence' exhibited by phenomenological reflection. On the basis of these findings, Hopkins suggests that the phenomenological methodology, operative in the so-called hermeneutic critique of transcendental consciousness, itself involves transcendental `presuppositions' that are most appropriately characterized in terms of intentional, and reflective, phenomena

The paper argues for three things. First, that the abstract concepts of ancient Greek and modern mathematics are fundamentally different. The general treatment of mathematical things in ancient Greek mathematics manifestly does not presuppose a general mathematical object, while in modern mathematics the generality of the method presupposes precisely such a general mathematical object. Two, that this difference in abstract concepts of mathematics makes a difference in our understanding of a discipline other than mathematics, specifically, in the discipline of history. And, three, that what is at issue in this difference is whether it is necessary for human beings to understand themselves from the perspective of history in order to understand themselves properly as human.Keywords: mathematical objects, concept of number, history, self-consciousness.Vienumas antikos ir naujųjų laikų filosofijoje ir visuotinės istorijos hipotezėBurt C. HopkinsSantraukaŠiame straipsnyje ginamos trys tezės. Pirma, kad abstrakčios antikos ir naujųjų laikų matematikos sąvokos yra fundamentaliai skirtingos. Bendras matematinių dalykų traktavimas antikos matematikoje akivaizdžiai nesuponuoja tokios matematinio objekto sąvokos, kokią numato naujųjų laikų matematikos metodas. Antra, šis abstrakčių matematikos sąvokų skirtingumas turi įtakos kitos, nematematinės disciplinos, o būtent – istorijos, supratimui. Trečia, šio skirtumo esminis aspektas yra klausimas, ar savęs kaip žmogaus suvokimui būtina suprasti save iš istorijos perspektyvos.Pagrindiniai žodžiai: matematiniai objektai, skaičiaus sąvoka, istorija, savimonė.

Volume XIX Reinach and Contemporary Philosophy Aim and Scope: The New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy provides an annual international forum for phenomenological research in the spirit of Husserl's groundbreaking work and the extension of this work by such figures as Scheler, Heidegger, Sartre, Levinas, Merleau-Ponty, and Gadamer. Contributors: Emanuela Carta, Maciej Czerkawski, Francesca De Vecchi, Aurlien Djian, Christopher Erhard, Guillaume Frchette, Hynek Janouek, Olimpia Giuliana Loddo, Giuseppe Lorini, Karl Mertens, Riccardo Paparusso, Fabio Tommy Pellizzer, Francesco Pisano, Alessandro Salice, Denis Seron, Michela Summa, Genki Uemura, Basil Vassilicos, and ngrid Vendrell Ferran. Submissions: Manuscripts, prepared for blind review, should be submitted to the Editors (burthopkins1@gmail.com and drummond@fordham.edu) electronically via e-mail attachments.

Volume XX Special Issue: Phenomenology in the Hispanic World, 2022 Aim and Scope: The New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy provides an annual international forum for phenomenological research in the spirit of Husserl's groundbreaking work and the extension of this work by such figures as Scheler, Heidegger, Sartre, Levinas, Merleau-Ponty and Gadamer. Contributors: Gabriele Baratelli, Jethro Bravo Gonzlez, Mariana Chu Garca, Jess M. Daz lvarez, No Expsito Ropero, Jos Gaos y Gonzlez Pola, Miguel Garca-Bar, Richard F. Hassing, Rosemary R.P. Lerner, Jethro Mass, Ernesto Mayz Vallenilla, Luis Niel, Jos Ortega y Gasset, Sergio Prez-Gatica, Jorge Portilla, Ignacio Quepons, Luis Romn Rabanaque, Alfonso Reyes Ochoa, Francisco Romero, Javier San Martn, Agustn Serrano de Haro, Luis Villoro, Roberto J. Walton, Joaqun Xirau Palau, Antonio Zirin Quijano. Submissions: Manuscripts, prepared for blind review, should be submitted to the Editors (burt-crowell.hopkins@univ-lille3.fr and drummond@fordham.edu) electronically via e-mail attachments.