SOVIET INFLUENCE IN SOUTHEAST ASIA
In: Asian survey: a bimonthly review of contemporary Asian affairs, Band 15, Heft 8, S. 656-671
ISSN: 0004-4687
25 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Asian survey: a bimonthly review of contemporary Asian affairs, Band 15, Heft 8, S. 656-671
ISSN: 0004-4687
In 2016, a law came into force in France granting terminally ill patients the right to continuous deep sedation (CDS) until death. This right was proposed as an alternative to euthanasia and presented as the 'French response' to problems at the end of life. The law draws a distinction between CDS and euthanasia and other forms of sympton control at the end of life. France is the first country in the world to legislate on CDS . This short report describes the particular context and underlying social values that led to this piece of legislation, and explores its meaning in the wider French context.
BASE
In: Journal of refugee studies, Band 23, Heft 3, S. 356-376
ISSN: 1471-6925
On July 2021, the UK High Court of Justice heard the Case CO/2066/2020 on the application of Heidi Crowter who lives with Down's syndrome, and Máire Lea-Wilson whose son Aidan has Down's syndrome. Crowter and Lea-Wilson, with the support of the disability rights campaign, 'Don't Screen Us Out', have been taking legal action against the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care (the UK Government) for a review of the 1967 Abortion Act: the removal of section 1(1)(d) making termination of pregnancy lawful for 'severe' fetal indications detected after 24 weeks' gestation. On 23 September 2021, the High Court dismissed the claim. This action came at a time when non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) was introduced into the NHS England Fetal Anomaly Screening Programme for the trisomies 21, 13 and 18. The implementation of NIPT has been heavily criticised, in particular by 'Don't Screen Us Out' campaigners, for increasing fetal selection and discrimination of people living with disabilities. The case of Crowter and Lea-Wilson echoes debates in other European countries such as in France and Germany, where the introduction of NIPT in the public healthcare system has provoked equally vehement public reactions and discussions. The comparison between these three countries allows contextualising the public discourses around NIPT and the ground for termination of pregnancy in relation to different socio-cultural and political contexts. We examine how each country, and particularly England, deals with the conflict between the principles of promoting the rights of people living with disabilities and preserving women's reproductive autonomy.
BASE
Dignity is one of the most controversial and yet commonly used terms in debates regarding end-of-life issues. The term "dignity" can take various meanings. For example, it can be used to denote the respect owed to an individual person, or to signify the intrinsic value of humankind as a whole. These two different understandings of dignity inevitably lead to different approaches to end-of-life decision -making.This paper explores the meaning of the term dignity in two European countries, England and France. Our analysis compares public debates and legislation on end-of-life related issues in these two countries. We will argue that in England dignity is most commonly understood as respect for individual autonomy, whereas in France dignity usually signifies respect for humanity as a whole. We will demonstrate that the difference in the conceptualisation of the term leads to different ethical, and hence legal and practical, approaches to end-of-life issues and vulnerable patients. Our particular focus is on: (1) withdrawing/-holding life-sustaining treatment; (2) respect for patient preferences; and (3) assistance in dying.Given the difference in the understanding of dignity, and the underlying philosophical approaches, it appears that there is still a long way to go before we can establish common guidelines on end-of-life decisions across Europe an d beyond. However clarifying the use of the term dignity in different discussions around Europe could hopefully facilitate this endeavour.
BASE
In: Journal of the Australian Population Association, Band 4, Heft 1, S. 1-12
In: International labour review, Band 111, S. 483-506
ISSN: 0020-7780
In: Australian quarterly: AQ, Band 16, Heft 1, S. 103
ISSN: 1837-1892
In: The British journal of social work, Band 39, Heft 5, S. 978-980
ISSN: 1468-263X
In: Common Market Law Review, Band 17, Heft 1, S. 31-74
ISSN: 0165-0750
In: Arizona Law Review, Band 58, S. 901
SSRN
In: Peace research abstracts journal, Band 44, Heft 3, S. 808
ISSN: 0031-3599
In: Journal of Medical Marketing, Band 10, S. 305-311
SSRN