Jews in Hungary after the Holocaust: The National Relief Committee for Deportees, 1945-1950
In: The journal of Israeli history: politics, society, culture, Volume 19, Issue 2, p. 69-91
ISSN: 1353-1042
4 results
Sort by:
In: The journal of Israeli history: politics, society, culture, Volume 19, Issue 2, p. 69-91
ISSN: 1353-1042
Autozygosity is associated with an increased risk of genetic rare disease, thus being a relevant factor for clinical genetic studies. More than 2400 exome sequencing data sets were analyzed and screened for autozygosity on the basis of detection of >1 Mbp runs of homozygosity (ROHs). A model was built to predict if an individual is likely to be a consanguineous offspring (accuracy, 98%), and probability of consanguinity ranges were established according to the total ROH size. Application of the model resulted in the reclassification of the consanguinity status of 12% of the patients. The analysis of a subset of 79 consanguineous cases with the Rare Disease (RD)-Connect Genome-Phenome Analysis Platform, combining variant filtering and homozygosity mapping, enabled a 50% reduction in the number of candidate variants and the identification of homozygous pathogenic variants in 41 patients, with an overall diagnostic yield of 52%. The newly defined consanguinity ranges provide, for the first time, specific ROH thresholds to estimate inbreeding within a pedigree on disparate exome sequencing data, enabling confirmation or (re)classification of consanguineous status, hence increasing the efficiency of molecular diagnosis and reporting on secondary consanguinity findings, as recommended by American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines. ; Supported by European Union projects RD-Connect, Solve-RD, and European Joint Programme of Rare Diseases (EJP-RD) grants FP7 305444, H2020 779257, and H2020 825575; Instituto de Salud Carlos III grants PT13/0001/0044 and PT17/0009/0019; Instituto Nacional de Bioinformática; ELIXIR Implementation Studies; European Union projects BBMRI-LPC EU FP7 313010, NeurOmics EU FP7 305121, and Undiagnosed Rare Disease Program of Catalonia (Departament de Salut, Generalitat de CatalunyaSLT002/16/00174); Canadian Institutes of Health Research Foundation grant FDN-167281 (H.L.); the European Research Council309548 (R.H.); the Wellcome Investigator Award 109915/Z/15/Z (R.H.); the Medical Research Council (United Kingdom) MR/N025431/1 (R.H.); the Wellcome Trust Pathfinder Scheme 201064/Z/16/Z (R.H. and H.L.); the Newton Fund (United Kingdom/Turkey) MR/N027302/1 (R.H. and H.L.); the Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness to the European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL) partnership; the Centro de Excelencia Severo Ochoa; the Centres de Recerca de Catalunya (CERCA) Program/Generalitat de Catalunya; the Generalitat de Catalunya through the Department of Health and Department of Business and Knowledge; the Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness with funds from the European Regional Development Fund corresponding to the 2014 to 2020 Smart Growth Operating Program.
BASE
Background Rare diseases are individually rare but globally affect around 6% of the population, and in over 70% of cases are genetically determined. Their rarity translates into a delayed diagnosis, with 25% of patients waiting 5 to 30 years for one. It is essential to raise awareness of patients and clinicians of existing gene and variant-specific therapeutics at the time of diagnosis to avoid that treatment delays add up to the diagnostic odyssey of rare diseases' patients and their families. Aims This paper aims to provide guidance and give detailed instructions on how to write homogeneous systematic reviews of rare diseases' treatments in a manner that allows the capture of the results in a computer-accessible form. The published results need to comply with the FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship to facilitate the extraction of datasets that are easily transposable into machine-actionable information. The ultimate purpose is the creation of a database of rare disease treatments ("Treatabolome") at gene and variant levels as part of the H2020 research project Solve-RD. Results Each systematic review follows a written protocol to address one or more rare diseases in which the authors are experts. The bibliographic search strategy requires detailed documentation to allow its replication. Data capture forms should be built to facilitate the filling of a data capture spreadsheet and to record the application of the inclusion and exclusion criteria to each search result. A PRISMA flowchart is required to provide an overview of the processes of search and selection of papers. A separate table condenses the data collected during the Systematic Review, appraised according to their level of evidence. Conclusions This paper provides a template that includes the instructions for writing FAIR-compliant systematic reviews of rare diseases' treatments that enables the assembly of a Treatabolome database that complement existing diagnostic and management support tools with treatment awareness data. ; The current paper was written for the Solve-RD project, which has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 779257. We further acknowledge funding from the Damp Foundation (to KL).
BASE