Suchergebnisse

Background: Home treatment (HT) is a patient-centred and cost-effective alternative to acute psychiatric inpatient care. However, the progress of its implementation and utilisation in routine care is slow. Aims: The aim of this study was to examine the knowledge and attitude towards HT among healthcare professionals. Method: This observational study included telephone-based semi-structured interviews of 140 referring healthcare professionals including 35 self-referring patients to a large psychiatric hospital in Switzerland during 6 months in 2020. We assessed their knowledge, attitude and experience with HT along with sociodemographic characteristics, professional background and the intention for the referral. We completed the interviews with routine medical data of the referred patients such as diagnoses or symptom severity. Results: Regarding referrals for inpatient treatment (involuntary and voluntary), half of the referring healthcare professionals and 80% of the self-referring patients had no prior experience or knowledge of HT. Knowledge of HT differed in the order of the participants' working places. We found that most participants were uncertain about the inclusion/exclusion criteria for HT. Despite the low levels of knowledge, attitudes towards HT were overall positive. Conclusions: Our results indicate that a proportion of the patients referred for inpatient treatment might have been eligible for HT too. The referring healthcare professionals' and patients' unfamiliarity and uncertainty with HT seems to be an important reason that home-based treatment approaches are still underused, although they are viewed very positively. Besides providing more information to potential referring health professionals, psychiatric hospitals should always carry out a standardized evaluation if HT is an option in patients who are referred for inpatient treatment.

Background: Involuntary admission (IA) for psychiatric treatment has a history of controversial discussions. We aimed to describe characteristics of a cohort of involuntarily compared to voluntarily admitted patients regarding clinical and socio-demographic characteristics before and after implementation of the new legislation. Methods: In this observational cohort study, routine data of 15'125 patients who were admitted to the University Hospital of Psychiatry Zurich between 2008 and 2016 were analyzed using a series of generalized estimating equations. Results: At least one IA occurred in 4'560 patients (30.1%). Of the 31'508 admissions 8'843 (28.1%) were involuntary. In the final multivariable model, being a tourist (OR = 3.5) or an asylum seeker (OR = 2.3), having a schizophrenic disorder (OR = 2.1), or a bipolar disorder (OR = 1.8) contributed most to our model. Male gender, higher age, prescription of neuroleptics (all OR 0.6) were also weakly associated with IA. Conclusions: Besides schizophrenic or bipolar disorders, a small group of patients had an increased risk for IA due to non-clinical parameters (i.e. tourists and asylum seekers). Knowledge about risk factors should be used for the development of multi-level strategies to prevent frequent (involuntary) hospitalizations in patients at risk. On the organizational level, we could show that the new legislation decreased the risk for IA, and therefore may have succeeded in strengthening patient autonomy.

Involuntary hospitalization is a frequently discussed intervention physicians must sometimes execute. Because this intervention has serious implications for the citizens' civil liberties it is regulated by law. Every country's health system approaches this issue differently with regard to the relevant laws and the logistical processes by which involuntary hospitalization generally is enacted. This paper aims at analyzing the regulation and process of involuntary hospitalization in New York (United States) and Zurich (Switzerland). Comparing the respective historical, political, and economic backgrounds shows how notions of risk and liberty are culture-bound and consequently shape legislation and local practices. It is highly relevant to reconsider which criteria are required for involuntary hospitalization as this might shape the view of society on psychiatric patients and psychiatry itself. Furthermore, this article discusses the impact that training and experience of the person authorized to conduct and maintain an involuntary hospitalization has on the outcome.

Background:Involuntary admissions can be detrimental for patients. Due to legal, ethical and clinical considerations, they are also challenging for referring physicians. Nevertheless, not much is known about the subjective perceptions of those who have to decide whether to conduct an involuntary admission or not.Aims:This study aimed at answering the question whether psychiatrists' perceptions of confidence during psychiatric emergency situations and consecutive involuntary admissions differ from those of physicians without a psychiatric training.Method:We assessed the professional background and subjective perceptions during psychiatric emergency situations in physicians who executed involuntary admissions to the University Hospital of Psychiatry Zurich. We used one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni-adjusted post hoc tests and chi-square tests to compare the responses of 43 psychiatrists with those of 64 other physicians.Results:Psychiatrists felt less time constraints compared with non-psychiatric residents. The latter also had more doubts on the necessity of the involuntary admission issued. Psychiatrists considered themselves significantly more experienced in handling psychiatric emergency situations and in handling the criteria for involuntary admissions than other physicians. Psychiatrists and other physicians did not differ in their satisfaction concerning course and results of psychiatric emergency situations which was overall high. About half of all participants felt pressure from third parties.Conclusion:Psychiatric emergency situations are challenging situations not only for patients but also for the involved physicians. Physicians with a specialized training might be more confident in the handling of psychiatric emergency situations and exertion of involuntary admissions. Non-psychiatric physicians might benefit from specialized training programs.