Suchergebnisse

Cover -- Contents -- List of Illustrations -- Acknowledgements -- Glossary and List of Abbreviations -- Introduction Capital Punishment and Colonial Rule: Punishment Violence and 'Civilization' in British Africa -- Chapter 1 'The Extreme Penalty of the Law': Law, Courts and Colonial Criminal Justice -- Chapter 2 The Ultimate Deterrent in a Colonial Context? Capital Punishment in Colonial Penal Regimes -- Chapter 3 To Hang or not to Hang? Capital Sentencing, Categories of Colonial Criminality and the Royal Prerogative of Mercy -- Chapter 4 Cultural Defence Narratives, African Voices and the Emotional Landscapes of Colonial Mercy -- Chapter 5 An exceptional penalty for exceptional crimes: Insurgency, colonial violence and the extension of the death penalty -- Chapter 6 Shocking crimes and scandalous punishments: Imperial politics, humanitarian sentiment and the death penalty -- Chapter 7 'In a humane and decorous manner': Rituals of execution from public hangings to death row -- Conclusion: The imperial gallows and colonial rule in British Africa -- Bibliography -- Index.

AbstractBoth male and female youth were significant actors in anti‐colonial insurgencies, but their involvement has been neglected in existing historiographies due to the marginalisation of youth voices in colonial archives. This article analyses the causes of youth insurgency and colonial counterinsurgency responses in two British colonies, Kenya and Cyprus, in 1954‐59, providing a gendered and relational study of youth as cohort, as liberation generation, as life stage and as kinship position. It argues that a 'gen[d]erational' lens is necessary to properly understand how age and gender intersected to shape boys' and girls' experiences of youth insurgency, and how colonial states punished and tried to 'rehabilitate' such rebellious youths. This article argues that colonial responses to youth in insurgency were implicitly shaped by colonial understandings of gender and generation as well as by race and ethnicity, but that counterinsurgency policies failed to effectively integrate gendered and generational perspectives sufficiently into either their security, peno‐legal or welfare and developmental responses. The only successful 'rehabilitation' programmes focused on male youth, and combined colonial and local understandings of age and gender to provided pathways towards the forms of adulthood desired by youth, rather than just treating them as unthinking, impressionable or irrecoverable children.

AbstractChild soldiers are often viewed as a contemporary, "new war" phenomenon, but international concern about their use first emerged in response to anti-colonial liberation struggles. Youth were important actors in anti-colonial insurgencies, but their involvement has been neglected in existing historiographies of decolonization and counterinsurgency due to the absence and marginalization of youth voices in colonial archives. This article analyses the causes of youth insurgency and colonial counterinsurgency responses to their involvement in conflict between ca. 1945 and 1960, particularly comparing Kenya and Cyprus, but also drawing on evidence from Malaya, Indochina/Vietnam, and Algeria. It employs a generational lens to explore the experiences of "youth insurgents" primarily between the ages of twelve and twenty. Youth insurgents were most common where the legitimate grievances of youth were mobilized by anti-colonial groups who could recruit children through colonial organizations as well as family and social networks. While some teenagers fought due to coercion or necessity, others were politically motivated and willing to risk their lives for independence. Youth soldiers served in multiple capacities in insurgencies, from protestors to couriers to armed fighters, in roles that were shaped by multiple logics: the need for troop fortification and sustained manpower; the tactical exploitation of youth liminality, and the symbolic mobilization of childhood and discourses of childhood innocence. Counterinsurgency responses to youthful insurgents commonly combined violence and development, highlighting tensions within late colonial governance: juveniles were beaten, detained, and flogged, but also constructed as "delinquents" rather than "terrorists" to facilitate their subsequent "rehabilitation."

Child soldiers have been heavily involved in contemporary African warfare. Since the 1990s, the 'child soldier crisis' has become a major humanitarian and human rights project. The figure of the child soldier has often been taken as evidence of the 'barbarism', dehumanization and trauma generated by modern warfare, but such images can obscure the complex reality of children's experiences of being part of armed groups during conflict. This article uses the published memoirs of former child soldiers from Sierra Leone, Sudan, Uganda, Eritrea and the Democratic Republic of the Congo to explore the instrumental and discursive nexus between child soldiers, memory, violence and humanitarianism. It assesses how (former-) children combatants remember and recount their experiences of war, and how these narratives can be shaped by humanitarian, literary and/or therapeutic framings. The article argues that these memoirs' significance lies in their affective truths and what they reveal about children's experience, and narrations, of war. Former child soldiers engage with, but also challenge, dominant contemporary humanitarian discourses surrounding childhood and violence to develop a 'victim, savage, saviour, campaigner' framework for their narratives. The article historically contextualizes the emergence of the 'child soldier memoir', before analysing the narratives of recruitment, indoctrination, and violence recounted by these former child soldiers, and their attempts to rework their identities in a post-conflict environment. It explores how former child soldiers narrate suffering and deploy discourses of trauma in their memoirs: some seeking to process wartime traumas, others leveraging their own suffering to position themselves as campaigners for those children still caught in conflict.