Suchergebnisse

The article reveals aspects of the formation of a complex mechanism of state regulation of territories economic potential development in Ukraine by improving the tools of its legal, organizational, informational, social and economic components. It is emphasized that the use of a separate functional mechanism significantly narrows the planned desired future outcome of transformations. It is proved that the combination into a single complex mechanism will ensure the highest efficiency of the public administration system, capable of self-reproduction in the long run. Practical recommendations for improving functional mechanisms as built-in elements of a complex mechanism of state regulation of territories economic potential development in Ukraine are given, which will improve the quality of executive bodies and local governments, will form the basis of modern business partnerships, strengthen economic opportunities at the local level in economic, social and environmental dimensions. It should reflect the strategic orientations of state building, be preventive in relation to future changes, take into account the turbulence of the external environment and give every citizen an awareness of stability and responsibility for the future of their own community. ; The article reveals aspects of the formation of a complex mechanism of state regulation of territories economic potential development in Ukraine by improving the tools of its legal, organizational, informational, social and economic components. It is emphasized that the use of a separate functional mechanism significantly narrows the planned desired future outcome of transformations. It is proved that the combination into a single complex mechanism will ensure the highest efficiency of the public administration system, capable of self-reproduction in the long run. Practical recommendations for improving functional mechanisms as built-in elements of a complex mechanism of state regulation of territories economic potential development in Ukraine are given, which will improve the quality of executive bodies and local governments, will form the basis of modern business partnerships, strengthen economic opportunities at the local level in economic, social and environmental dimensions. It should reflect the strategic orientations of state building, be preventive in relation to future changes, take into account the turbulence of the external environment and give every citizen an awareness of stability and responsibility for the future of their own community.

.

.

.

The article is analyzing fragmentation and integration waves in sociology development. The first integrative wave was in the 1920s – 1950s. It appeared in grand theories by P. Sorokin, T. Parsons, the Frankfurt school uniting heterogeneous ideas from classics in models of society as system. After the paradigm crisis of the 1960s-70s and following spread of postmodernist discourse, the second integrative wave arose in form of theories overcoming gaps between concepts of determinist structures and constructivist agency (J. Habermas, A. Giddens, P. Bourdieu) as well as in form of metatheorizing (G. Ritzer, P. Sztompka, J. Alexander). Today's fragmentation of sociology under conditions of metaparadigm crisis and post-globalization is provoked by the rising postcolonial discourse, by attempts to stigmatize western classics and to create theoretical alternatives to the 'global North' domination in knowledge production as well as by conceptions opposing social reality of networks and flows to classical sociality of structures and agency. The third integrative wave is expected to come in the 2020s displacing tendencies of disintegration, discrimination, growing gaps and rising barriers. New theories are relevant as they create a coherent configuration of four types of structures: institutions, interactions, networks, and flows. Concepts of augmented social reality, augmented Modernity, and augmented data are proposed to be solutions for theoretical and methodological integration in sociology.