Dedication -- Acknowledgements -- Contents -- Biographical Notes of Contributors -- List of Figures -- List of Tables -- 1: Has the Financial Crisis Led to a Paradigm Shift? -- Introduction -- Shifting Financial, Economic and Welfare Paradigms -- The Political Repercussions of the Crisis -- Rationale and Structure of the Book -- References -- Part I: A Change in Regulation Paradigms -- 2: Paradigm Shift in Financial-Sector Policymaking Models: From Industry-Based to Civil Society-Based EU Financial Services Governance?
Zugriffsoptionen:
Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
This article proposes that product intervention constitutes a form of residual lawmaking by ESMA that allows it to tackle aspects of investor protection not addressed by EU incomplete financial laws. Whilst product intervention may bring about certain advantages and may contribute to mitigating regulatory arbitrage problems, it constitutes a highly intrusive regulatory mechanism that raises important questions concerning: (a) ESMA's rationale and motivations for its use; (b) its compliance with the EU constitutional framework; and (c) its adequacy for the regulation of complex financial products. This article addresses these questions through an analysis of the rationale and consequences of ESMA's product intervention measures on binary options and contracts for differences of May 2018–July 2019, and of recent reforms of ESMA's powers. It offers three main contributions to the existing literature. First, it contributes to the literature on administrative discretion and agencies' rulemaking through an analysis of the political economy of ESMA's deployment of product intervention powers and, also, of what this reveals about the relationships between ESMA and the EU Institutions, on the one side, and ESMA and National Competent Authorities, on the other. Second, it contributes to the literature on the constitutionality of EU agencies through an examination of the compliance of ESMA's product intervention measures with EU constitutional law and requirements. Third, it examines whether product intervention constitutes an adequate mechanism to address problems pertaining to investor protection in complex financial products markets and, in doing so, it contributes to the scholarly discussion on complex financial products' regulation.
