Suchergebnisse

The article is devoted to the analysis of current trends in higher education in modern Russia. In modern society, education is a fundamental area that contributes to the formation of human potential and ensures the socio-economic and technological development of the country. The modern education system is characterized by contradictory phenomena that hinder the growth of the national economy. It is established that a number of trends are caused by the processes of commercialization prevailing in the fi eld of higher education, which negatively aff ects the development of human potential. It is determined that despite the problem of regional diff erentiation of higher education, the use of digital technologies to increase the availability of education does not always have a positive impact on reducing the level of socio-economic inequality. The analysis of the results of the existing trends will allow us to revise the current educational policy in the Russian Federation in order to develop human potential in the context of global and national challenges.

The article is an attempt to generalize the results of the discussion that was held on the pages of this journal after the publication of the article [9] on its pages. In total, 11 authors participated in the discussion, published in the journal "Ideas and Ideals". Summing up the discussion, we note that narcissism is interesting as a topic of interdisciplinary research and discussions. The available materials allow us to conclude that either the phenomenon of narcissism itself or its reflection by specialists are at the initial stage of formation. The published articles allow us to conclude that different groups of authors interpret both culture itself and the modern phenomenon of narcissism in different ways. The understanding of culture as a set of practices used by P.A. Orekhovsky and V.I. Razumov, is shared by N.I. Martishina, V.A. Skorev, Yu.Yu. Pershin, G.A. Illarionov, V.I. Kudashov. The approach to culture as a metasystem is typical for the works of A.G. Teslinova and L.Yu. Logunova. A variant of culture as a feature of cognition was proposed by O.V. Khlebnikova ("conceptual" and "clip" thinking), a variant of distinguishing socialist and capitalist ("necrophilic") culture is used by S.M. Zhuravleva. Thus, narcissism is considered in very different contexts, which makes it difficult to understand it and makes, in fact, impossible to develop a conventional attitude towards practices implemented in politics, science, and education. It is appropriate to refer to the following discussions of the theory and practice of narcissism with the topic of the relationship of narcissism with religiosity. From a prognostic perspective, it is interesting to look at the prospects for links between narcissism and the future of postmodernism and the mass consumer society. According to P.A. Orekhovsky and V.I. Razumov, if we consider the discussion that took place as an experiment in the indication of scientific rhetoric, then its results convincingly testify both to the fruitfulness of the concept of narcissism and to the legitimacy of concern for the preservation of the universe of previous practices and conventions. The lack of clarity in the understanding of narcissism indicates that this phenomenon is just beginning to attract the attention of specialists.