Suchergebnisse

Using the most recent archival sources, the author describes the organization of the judiciary & the courts in Zadar & Dalmatia after the Italian occupation in 1918. In violation of the cease-fire agreement, the Italian occupational authorities reorganized the judiciary institutions & defined the new territorial jurisdiction of courts so as to establish judiciary control over both the occupied & unoccupied parts of Dalmatia. The purpose of this new organization of the courts & the constant propaganda relating to it was to prove that Zadar & Dalmatia belonged to Italy -- culturally, civilizationally, & politically. 3 Appendixes, 13 References. Adapted from the source document.

On leaving Zadar in September of 1943, Italians burnt the biggest part of their political documents in the courtyard of the then Waterworks Department. This has been a setback for those interested in the interwar history of Zadar and Dalmatia, particularly those investigating the first months of the occupation. The lack of authentic documents is even today an obstacle to a solidly and scientifically built argumentation in the study of that period of Italian occupation and thus every new document, hidden in the rich collection of the Historical Archives in Zadar is a challenge for a new or a more complete interpretation of the first year of the Italian occupation of Dalmatia. This text is another attempt to answer this challenge by means of the original material from the archives and to fill in certain missing pieces in the mosaic of the organization and relationship between the civil and the military authorities in the occupied Dalmatia in 1919. (SOI : PM: S. 203)

Using the most recent archive sources, the author describes the organization of the judiciary and the courts in Zadar and Dalmatia after the Italian occupation in 1918. In violation of the Ceasefire agreement, the Italian occupational authorities reorganized the judiciary institutions, defined the new territorial jurisdiction of courts in order to establish judiciary control over both the occupied and the unoccupied parts of Dalmatia. The purpose of this new organization of the courts and the constant propaganda was to prove that Zadar and Dalmatia belonged to Italy - culturally, civilisationally, and politically. (SOI : S. 222)

On leaving Zadar in Sept 1943, Italians burned the biggest part of their political documents in the courtyard of the then Waterworks Dept. This has been a setback for those interested in the interwar history of Zadar & Dalmatia, particularly those investigating the first months of the occupation. The lack of authentic documents remains an obstacle to solid research on the period of Italian occupation of Dalmatia. This text draws on original material from the archives to fill in certain missing pieces in the mosaic of the organization & relationship between the civil & the military authorities in occupied Dalmatia in 1919. 3 Appendixes, 9 References. Adapted from the source document.

Using the most recent archival sources, the author describes the organization of the judiciary & the courts in Zadar & Dalmatia after the Italian occupation in 1918. In violation of the cease-fire agreement, the Italian occupational authorities reorganized the judiciary institutions & defined the new territorial jurisdiction of courts so as to establish judiciary control over both the occupied & unoccupied parts of Dalmatia. The purpose of this new organization of the courts & the constant propaganda relating to it was to prove that Zadar & Dalmatia belonged to Italy -- culturally, civilizationally, & politically. 3 Appendixes, 13 References. Adapted from the source document.

The current trends in media industry (in the text referred to as concentration trend, diversification, globalization, and deregulation) bring up the question of the scope of classical liberal theory when .faced with the challenges of new communication technologies. The convergence of the market and the capital, the interests from the point of view of ownership and the commercialisation of mass media make up the contextual framework of the debate about certain limitations of the principles of classical liberal theory concerning freedom of the press and media in general. (SOI : PM: S. 176)

The author poses the question about the fate of neoconservatism, in the 1980s the official political orientation in the USA. Twenty years later, one can see how anti-communism and anti-modernism, neoconservatism's fundamental ideological premises, have changed the political practice and awareness, both (and equally) in American foreign and national policy. Though conceptually incoherent, neoconservatism has proved to possess exceptional clout. This has led the author to conclude that neoconservatism, despite the claims by neoconservatives themselves that it is dead, still has much leeway, since voters' awareness has been changed: they have got used to the new political context, they vote for well-balanced "mixtures" of rightist and leftist ideologies. (SOI : PM: S. 164)

The author poses the question about the fate of neoconservatism, the official political orientation in the 1980s US. Twenty years later, one can see how anticommunism & antimodernism, neoconservatism's fundamental ideological premises, have changed political practice & awareness, both (& equally) in foreign & in national policy. Though conceptually incoherent, neoconservatism has proved to possess exceptional clout. This has led the author to conclude that neoconservatism, despite the claims by neoconservatives themselves that it is dead, still has much leeway, since voters' awareness has been changed: they have become used to the new political context, & they vote for well-balanced "mixtures" of rightist & leftist ideologies. 24 References. Adapted from the source document.

The current trends in media industry (in the text referred to as concentration trend, diversification, globalization, & deregulation) bring up the question of the scope of classical liberal theory when faced with the challenges of new communication technologies. The convergence of the market & the capital, the interests from the point of view of ownership & the commercialization of mass media make up the contextual framework of the debate about certain limitations of the principles of classical liberal theory concerning freedom of the press & media in general. 1 Table, 10 References. Adapted from the source document.