Beyond securitization: explaining the scope of security policy in Southeast Asia
In: International relations of the Asia-Pacific: a journal of the Japan Association of International Relations, Band 11, Heft 3, S. 403-432
ISSN: 1470-4838
132 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: International relations of the Asia-Pacific: a journal of the Japan Association of International Relations, Band 11, Heft 3, S. 403-432
ISSN: 1470-4838
In: Refugee survey quarterly, Band 19, Heft 3, S. 130-150
ISSN: 1471-695X
In: International public management journal, Band 3, Heft 2, S. 205-227
ISSN: 1559-3169
In: International public management journal, Band 2, Heft 2, S. 371-388
ISSN: 1559-3169
In: New political science: a journal of politics & culture, Band 28, S. 217-250
ISSN: 0739-3148
THE CONCEPT OF 'CIVIL RIGHTS' IS BASED ON ASSUMPTIONS THAT DO NOT EXTEND TO ALL LANDS WITHIN U.S. BORDERS, INCLUDING NATIVE AMERICAN RESERVATIONS. A CENTRAL POLICY TENSION EXISTS BETWEEN ENFORCING EURO-AMERICAN 'CIVIL RIGHTS' AND RECOGNIZING NATIVE AMERICAN SOVEREIGNTY. THIS TENSION IS DISCUSSED IN LIGHT OF THE SITUATION ON THE WHITE EARTH RESERVATION, ONE OF SIX RESERVATIONS THAT MAKE UP THE MINNESOTA CHIPPEWA TRIBE. FOUR POSSIBLE MEANS OF ADDRESSING WHITE EARTH CIVIL RIGHTS ISSUES ARE DISCUSSED, EACH WITH POSSIBLE APPLICATIONS IN OTHER RESERVATION SETTINGS. NONE OF THE FOUR IS FOUND TO BE CLEARLY EFFECTIVE IN GAINING THE CIVIL RIGHTS DEFINED FOR U.S. CITIZENS FOR RESERVATION RESIDENTS. ALTHOUGH THE UNDERLYING QUESTION OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CIVIL RIGHTS AND SOVEREIGNTY DEFIES EASY SOLUTION, SOME SUGGESTIONS ARE OFFERED.
In: New left review: NLR, Heft 182, S. 53-61
ISSN: 0028-6060
World Affairs Online
In: New left review: NLR, Band no.182, Heft Jul/Aug 90
ISSN: 0028-6060
Mrs Maria Mejia was a 47-year-old Maya woman who lived in the village of Parraxtut, in the Quiche province in the western highlands of Guatemala. She was murdered at 7.30 pm on Saturday, 17 March 1990 when 2 armed men burst into her house and shot her and her second husband. Examines the countryside's militarisation and the bureaucratisation of human rights. (SJK)
In: Business history, Band 4, Heft 2, S. 129-131
ISSN: 1743-7938
The theme of this article is that for reasons related more closely to politic incentives rather than fiscal reality there is a tendency among some policy makers to make wrong choices in attempting to manage fiscal stress and crisis, preferring to use more easily negotiated "quick fixes" such as across-the-board cuts in spending for programs that do not contribute much to deficits and debt. In fact such cutting usually makes the fiscal situation worse rather than better because they reduce economic growth in the private sector needed to pull out of debt and economic recession (Bureau of Economic Analysis, 2012). Typically, such budget reductions result in increased unemployment as public sector jobs are cut, further reducing revenues to government while increasing unemployment insurance cost of government. Fiscal stress is defined as when revenues fall short of expenses but a government or other public entity in debt remains able to obtain loans to finance current operations and debt restructuring, albeit at increasingly higher level of interest while they participate in some form of debt restructuring. Fiscal crisis occurs when governments no longer can get loans and are not able to sell their debt in financial markets at any price. This article examines US fiscal stress conditions and management approaches and then compares the US experience to that of the European Union and the Eurozone. It explains that while there is genuine need for changes in fiscal policy, such changes should be proposed, analyzed thoroughly, negotiated and implemented carefully over time rather than yielding to political expedience using debt panic as a means of forcing the adoption of quick but unworkable approaches to resolution of the real problems that cause both short and longer-term fiscal stress.
BASE
Among the issues debated presently by public management scholars and practitioners is whether the wave of New Public Management-oriented reform in nations around the world has passed the crest and is now in decline. It is difficult to generalize across nations and within nation states on this issue because the evidence is mixed. Alternative arguments are made by participants in this symposium to the effect that NPM (a) is in decline, (b) is still on the rise, (c) has entered the phase of implementation, which takes much longer and is more difficult to evaluate. Proponents of the third view indicate that the phase of political rhetoric and initial NPM program development is over in most contexts. Emphasis is now placed upon attempting to making changes instituted in the past decade work as intended to deliver results to meet the expectations articulated widely at the beginning of the reform era. Other issues related to why NPM developed as it has, and how it has been put into practice are articulated by participants in this dialogue. One issue given particular attention is the role and impact of e-government as a complement to or an integral part of NPM.
BASE
Public management has evolved as a distinct sub-discipline within the larger discipline of management over the past several decades. Public management is different from what is often referred to as "traditional public administration" in that the former focuses more on what happens within governments and on the operation of the line functions of government while public management pays more attention to the operation of government organizations from the perspective of their interaction with the environments in which they operate. Public management tends to conceive of governments and governance systems similar to the ways that organizational theorists focus on strategic behavior in response to contingency in the environment. Public management views organizations that provide services to the public as adaptive systems influenced by critical variables in their surroundings. Additionally, public management incorporates an economics perspective on the value of competition between organizations in markets, and also business/marketing thinking about strategic positioning of products/services and product/service lines relative to the attributes of consumer preferences and market demand.
BASE
In late February 2004, well-known and highly respected Canadian academic Donald Savoie was appointed to assist the Canadian government, "to help overhaul the management and accountability of government in the aftermath of [a] scandal." Among the remarks Savoie made to the press upon appointment was the following excerpt, "New public management has been completely discredited, thank God" (The Ottawa Citizen, 2/27/04). Savoie's comment and the article that carried it were brought to the attention of the IPMN community by Alasdair Roberts. The comment stimulated a dialogue about NPM on the IPMN listserver that is represented in this symposium, in roughly the order in which comments were transmitted, with only minor editing. The dialogue tells much about current views on the utility, or lack thereof, of New Public Management and how the maturation of NPM is perceived by the international community of scholars in the field of public management.
BASE
At the end of November 2004, well-known and highly respected scholar Steven Kelman of the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University asked a question about research on outyear budgetary consequences of agency cost savings. Kelman's question stimulated a dialogue on the topic on the IPMN listserver that is represented in this symposium, in roughly the order in which comments were transmitted, with only minor editing. The dialogue tells much about current views on the utility, or lack thereof, of research on outyear savings and the wisdom of allowing agencies to carry-forward savings from one year to another.
BASE
Various systems to integrate performance measurement into budgeting are applied in nations around the world. Governments at all levels have embarked on a journey into performance measurement and management. Performance budgeting, and the application of performance analysis in budgeting, is a topic of a considerable discourse in the public management community. This symposium provides dialogue and comment on efforts to integrate performance evaluation into the executive budget process at the federal government level in the United States of America under the administration of President George W. Bush. The experience of other nations also is addressed.
BASE