Suchergebnisse

AbstractIn this article, we question one of the important notions of the Corsican normative conceptual apparatus: the polynomie. This concept is particularly interesting as a language ideological position that calls into question dominant ideological perspectives on standardization and normalization. This article puts the polynomie in an ideological process that calls for a critical sociolinguistic analysis that first accounts for the interaction between sociolinguistic, economic, political and ideological domains. That critical sociolinguistic perspective emphasizes that all language ideological frameworks – even those which recognize diversity – impose particular criteria and give value to some ways of speaking and being over others.

Abstract
This article addresses the concept of the new speaker from both a theoretical/definitional perspective and from the standpoint of a situated, ethnographic analysis. The more general and theoretical focus addresses some of the presuppositions and entailments of the new speaker concept, both as an "on-the-ground" concept that gets operationalized by social actors and as an analytical category used by researchers. In particular, it considers how the new speaker concept elucidates criteria in relation to which minority language-speaking communities of practice are conceptualized and enacted. The ethnographic focus, on Corsican adult language classrooms, explores how new-speakerness is invoked implicitly in Corsica, where the term "new speaker" itself is not in circulation, but is a target of language planning strategies. This ethnographic research reveals complex identity and language ideological issues that are raised about the legitimacy, authority and authenticity of Corsican language learners in a sociolinguistic context in which both formal/institutional and informal/social use of the minority language is quite restricted.

This article explores the attribution of authority and authenticity to speakers of "accented" or dialectal speech portrayed in the American documentary on dialectal diversity, "Do You Speak American?". The focus is on the role of mediation and mediatization in this fundamentally political and ideological process: that is, the extent to which particular sequences of the documentary foreground the work of representation being done by media producers. The central claim made in the analysis is that speakers' authenticity is produced through the backgrounding of this work of representation, but that speakers are attributed greater authority when they are depicted as having some control over how their images and speech are mediated and mediatized. Speakers who have both authority and authenticity benefit, it is argued, from media verisimilitudes: they are understood by media audiences as having control over the believable rather than the "real".

Résumé Suivant une analyse « idéologique », cet article aborde l'histoire contemporaine de la revendication linguistique en Corse. Trois catégories de résistance à la domination linguistique se distinguent dans la manière dont elles reproduisent – ou rompent avec – des idéologies linguistiques dominantes. Il apparaît alors difficile, voire impossible, pour des mouvements de langues minorisées de ne pas reproduire ces idéologies qui structurent le marché symbolique aussi bien que politique. En même temps, les locuteurs de ces langues développent une sensibilité en rapport avec la complexité de l'identité minoritaire et du fonctionnement du pouvoir linguistique, facilitant ainsi le développement de modèles alternatifs de langue et d'identification liés au contexte européen et mondial.