Suchergebnisse

The background of this research is the support of the people of Yogyakarta to the sultan to lead Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. This paper is aimed at examining the relationship between a king and the community in the democracy era. The cases examined specifically in this study were the case of the proposed law of Yogyakarta in the Sutet region, and the ore mining case in Kulonprogo. Research was conducted qualitatively by collecting data through documentation, observation and interview. Informant retrieval technique is done by cluster technique. This research is analyzed by rational choice theory which assumes that people are always trying to optimize the choices that bring benefits (Mallarangeng 2008: 9, Kuper & Kuper 2000: 895). The study had various findings, such that public support of the king could not be explained by the concept of Javanese power and that logical consideration in the form of the interest proximity of each group becomes a concept of public support against the king. When the group interests are closer, they show their support, but, when the gap becomes wider, they readily change their support without fear of karma.

ABSTRACT The background of this research was the continuously increasing phenomenon of the land use and job conversions from agricultural to nonagricultural sector. The data showed the reduce of people enthusiasm for being a farmer. Hence, it could threat the regional food resilience. This research aimed to observed the government policys when the prices of agricultural commodity increased and how the farmers response. To answered the objective of this research, the researcher looked at phenomenon of increasing price of chilli at the beginning of 2017 and the increasing price of rice in the beginning of 2018. Meanwhile, the response of the farmers was sought by making an interview with 33 farmers living in Mulyodadi Village, Bantul Regency. This research found that though the government had a vision to improved the prosperity of the farmer, it seemed that the government tended to reduced the price of agricultural commodity as soon as possible. As a result, it triggered the perception among farmers that the policy on the price of agricultural commodity in Indonesia did not give any hope to obtained the economic prosperity. They also viewed that their life would not be better as long asa the work in agricultural sector. As a consequence, the enthusiasm to be a farmer continously declined and weakened the regional/national food resilience. ABSTRAKPenelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh fenomena alih fungsi lahan dan konversi pekerjaan dari pertanian ke non-pertanian yang setiap tahun angkanya selalu meningkat. Data tersebut menunjukan gairah masyarakat untuk bertani semakin hari semakin kecil sehingga dapat membahayakan ketahanan pangan wilayah. Berdasarkan latar belakang tersebut penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat kebijakan apa yang diambil pemerintah ketika harga-harga komoditas pertanian naik, serta bagaimana respons petani terhadap kebijakan tersebut. Untuk menjawab tujuan penelitian itu, peneliti melakukan kajian terhadap kebijakan yang diambil pemerintah ketika terjadi kenaikan harga cabai pada awal tahun 2017 dan kenaikan beras pada awal 2018. Sedangkan respons petani dicari dengan melakukan wawancara terhadap petani yang tinggal di Desa Mulyodadi Kabupaten Bantul. Penelitian ini menemukan bahwa meskipun pemerintah mempunyai visi berusaha untuk meningkatkan kesejahteraan petani, namun berdasarkan kebijakan-kebijakan yang diambil ketika harga komoditas pertanian naik menunjukkan bahwa pemerintah cenderung tidak suka dan berusaha menurunkan harga komoditas pertanian secara cepat. Akibatnya muncul pengetahuan di kalangan petani bahwa kebijakan harga komoditas pertanian di Indonesia tidak memberi mereka harapan untuk mendapatkan kesejahteraan ekonomi. Muncul pengetahuan bahwa nasib mereka tidak akan baik ketika tetap bekerja di sektor pertanian. Akibatnya gairan bertani terus menerus mengalami penurunan yang dapat melemahkan ketahanan pangan wilayah.

This research is motivated by the failure of Indonesian government in implementing its poverty alleviation. Poverty rate in Indonesia does not decrease although the government has implemented a complete strategy to address the problem. It is right that the poor household has got a lot of help from the government, but their welfare does not increase. The program seems merely to serve as a temporary safety valve. This study attempts to find the causes of the failure of the program. The research has found that unchanged consciousness of the beneficiaries becomes the main factor of the failure. In their consciousness, the beneficiaries do not find a true dream about the ideal of what will be achieved in the future. If they have such a dream, it is more on meeting the current needs and is not followed by reasoning instrument in the form of guidelines for their goal achievement.

Jokowi's image as a leader is populist-nasionalist. However, there were some contradictory news with the related image in the social media, which is released in December 2016 until January 2017. This research aims to explore those distorted news. It is revealed that the government media framing did not dominate the social media. The news were interpreted or added in accordance with the viewer's interest that leads to a hoax. This research reinforces Barthes, Baudrillard, and Eco that the era of social media brings the death of reality.

Most cities in Indonesia have trash problems. The local governments send the city's trash to the landfills. However, the longer the trash volume in the landfill is increasing, the fuller some landfills are going to be running out of space in a short time. Kampung Mandiri Sampah (The Independent Trash Village) is one of the city's solutions to reduce trash in the landfills. However, many people still have difficulties to create Kampung Mandiri Sampah. This paper aimed to provide a guideline regarding the stages of creating a Trash Independent Village with the trash donation method. To describe these stages, the Practicum Team of the Community Development Departement, Dakwah and Communication Faculty, UIN Sunan Kalijaga conducted an experiment to create a Trash Independent Village using participatory action research methods in Blimbingsari Hamlet, Caturtunggal Village, Depok Sub-district, Sleman District. It took six months. We conclude that there are ten stages that can be taken by the community to create a Trash Independent Village with the Trash Donation methods. The result of this program is to make household waste no longer disposed of in a landfill, but it is sorted and processed so that it provides economic benefits for the community. Kampung Mandiri Sampah sorts of waste from the house. The conclusion is that Kampung Mandiri Sampah is able to reduce the waste disposal volume in the landfill. ABSTRAK Hampir semua kota di Indonesia mempunyai masalah dengan sampah. Sampah kota dikirim ke Tempat Pembuangan Akhir (TPA). Namun semakin hari volume sampah di TPA semakin banyak sehingga beberapa TPA tidak lagi mampu menampung sampah. Kampung Mandiri Sampah merupakan salah satu solusi kota untuk mengurangi kecepatan penuhnya sampah di TPA. Namun banyak orang yang masih kesulitan untuk mewujudkan Kampung Mandiri Sampah. Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk memberikan guideline terkait tahapan mendirikan Kampung Mandiri Sampah dengan metode sedekah sampah. Metode yang digunakan adalah ceramah, focus group discussion, dan ...