Suchergebnisse

The 2016 EU Global Strategy and the 2015 European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) review have made stabilisation of the ENP area one of their main priorities. Our argument here, however, is that the Global Strategy and the ENP review not only seek to mitigate the numerous crises currently affecting the neighbourhood; they also aim to address a set of intra-EU vulnerabilities linked to events in the ENP area that are threatening the EU's own ontological security. We employ narrative analysis to explore how insecurity in the EU and in the ENP area is affecting the EU's relation to the neighbourhood-other and its understanding of the EU-self. Our main findings point to the Global Strategy and the ENP review providing ample measures to stabilise the neighbourhood. However, whether they have provided a sufficiently compelling narrative to enable the emergence of new emotional structures for the EU and its member states to make sense of themselves and their relation to the neighbourhood-other remains an open question.

During the anti-regime uprisings in Tunisia, Egypt and Libya, women from all walks of life were as ready as men to take to the streets to protest against the ineptitude and transgressions of their countries' governments. Their courage was particularly noteworthy given that they suffered not only the violence of the regimes' attempts to suppress protests by force, as did their male counterparts, but also a systematic targeting by security forces who attempted to break the women's spirits through attacks on their honour and bodily integrity. The female presence and agency in the Arab Spring encouraged activists in Tunisia, Egypt and Libya to expect an equitable role for women in the political transition processes that followed the fall of the authoritarian regimes in those countries. However, the female input in those political transitions has been scant. Moreover, in all three countries, established women's rights are increasingly under attack and violence against women is on the rise. This article applies a gendered perspective to explore the upheavals of the Arab Spring and the political transitions in the three countries, and inquires into the insecurities that women have suffered since early 2011.

La UE ha desarrollado desde el final de la Guerra Fría un modelo distintivo de la política exterior hacia los países socios en el Mediterráneo, en el norte de Europa y en los Balcanes occidentales basado en el multilateralismo regional, la cooperación multisectorial, el intervencionismo, así como una narrativa en torno a la noción de que la Unión tiene una "responsabilidad" hacia los países en estas áreas. Este modelo representa una proyección de la identidad internacional de la UE en relación a estos países vecinos. No obstante, al mismo tiempo la UE ha experimentado dificultades en tener un impacto decisivo y positivo en estas mismas zonas y se podría incluso argumentar que los países socios de la UE desconfían del modelo que la UE les ofrece. La presente tesis doctoral pretende examinar la falta de resonancia del modelo de política exterior de la UE en zonas colindantes. Con este fin nos proponemos responder a las siguientes preguntas de investigación: ¿qué es identidad internacional de la Unión Europea? ¿Cómo se construye? ¿Cómo impacta la identidad internacional de la UE en su relación con terceros países, en particular, con tres áreas muy priorizadas por la UE como el Mediterráneo, el norte de Europa y los Balcanes occidentales? La primera parte de la tesis examina los diferentes nodos cognitivos sobre los que la UE construye su identidad internacional y estudia la evolución histórica de la política exterior de la UE en términos de su identidad internacional hacia el Mediterráneo, el norte de Europa y los Balcanes occidentales. La segunda parte analiza las relaciones entre la UE y cada una de estas áreas en profundidad por vía del Proceso de Barcelona, la Dimensión Septentrional y el Proceso de Estabilización y Asociación y políticas asociadas. La tercera parte de la tesis analiza como el modo en que la UE construye su identidad causa resonancia y disonancia en relación con los países socios en las mismas zonas. ; The EU has developed a distinctive foreign policy model towards partner countries in the ...

The 2016 EU Global Strategy and the 2015 European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) review have made stabilisation of the ENP area one of their main priorities. Our argument here, however, is that the Global Strategy and the ENP review not only seek to mitigate the numerous crises currently affecting the neighbourhood; they also aim to address a set of intra-EU vulnerabilities linked to events in the ENP area that are threatening the EU's own ontological security. We employ narrative analysis to explore how insecurity in the EU and in the ENP area is affecting the EU's relation to the neighbourhood-other and its understanding of the EU-self. Our main findings point to the Global Strategy and the ENP review providing ample measures to stabilise the neighbourhood. However, whether they have provided a sufficiently compelling narrative to enable the emergence of new emotional structures for the EU and its member states to make sense of themselves and their relation to the neighbourhood-other remains an open question.

AbstractThis article explores the European Union's (EU's) assistance to Ukraine through the lens of critical geopolitics with a view to ascertaining whether the EU has become more geopolitical in its thinking and actions towards Eastern Europe. Our findings point to a mixed picture. Whilst the EU 'mindscape' appears to have shifted in relation to Eastern Europe, Ukraine and itself as an actor in the region, it is less apparent that the EU's foreign and security policy action has become geopoliticised. The 2022 Russian invasion has certainly seen a step change from the hesitant and self‐conscious approach that characterised the EU's engagement with Eastern Europe prior to 2022. However, declarations such as that by the High Representative and Vice President of the European Commission (HRVP) around the 'birth of geopolitical Europe' appear to be somewhat premature, as there is limited evidence at this stage that the EU is willing to provide leadership on the geospatial (re)ordering of the region.