Suchergebnisse
Filter
Format
Medientyp
Sprache
Jahre
13 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
Why the marginal social cost of funds is not the shadow value of government revenue
No distinction is made between the marginal social cost of public funds (MCF) and the shadow value of government revenue in the public finance literature. Their separate roles are demonstrated in this paper, where the MCF is used as a scaling coefficient to account for changes in tax inefficiency on revenue transfers made to balance the government budget, while the shadow value of government revenue is used as a scaling coefficient to convert efficiency effects into actual changes in utility. We find a revenue effect identified by Atkinson and Stern (1974) and Dahlby (1998) in the shadow value of government revenue which is not present in the MCF. It is the reason why, in the presence of distorting taxes, the shadow value of government revenue can differ from unity, whereas the MCF is always unity, for a lump-sum tax.
BASE
Non-tax Distortions in Markets
In: Applied Welfare Economics, S. 82-106
Revised Shadow Prices
In: Applied Welfare Economics, S. 139-154
Conventional Shadow Prices
In: Applied Welfare Economics, S. 42-65
Measuring Welfare Changes—A Brief Overview
In: Applied Welfare Economics, S. 1-39
The Marginal Social Cost of Public Funds
In: Applied Welfare Economics, S. 156-183
The Optimal Provision of Public Goods
In: Applied Welfare Economics, S. 234-253
Optimal Commodity Taxation
In: Applied Welfare Economics, S. 214-231
Time and the Social Discount Rate
In: Applied Welfare Economics, S. 187-211