Die Inhalte der verlinkten Blogs und Blog Beiträge unterliegen in vielen Fällen keiner redaktionellen Kontrolle.
Warnung zur Verfügbarkeit
Eine dauerhafte Verfügbarkeit ist nicht garantiert und liegt vollumfänglich in den Händen der Blogbetreiber:innen. Bitte erstellen Sie sich selbständig eine Kopie falls Sie einen Blog Beitrag zitieren möchten.
Jordan Scott The Gwich'in creation story tells that long ago, the Gwich'in and the caribou were one. As they separated into two beings, they became relatives and made an agreement. The land would sustain theContinue reading
Abstract Zero-rating practices and associated throttling practices have been an issue of intense public policy debate. This article evaluates such practices under the Open Internet Order's transparency, no-throttling, and general conduct rules. The evaluation separately considers application-agnostic zero-rating, class-based zero-rating, edge provider-based zero-rating, and affiliated zero-rating. The article evaluates sponsored data programs (AT&T Sponsored Data, Verizon FreeBee Data), zero-rating and throttling of video streaming (T-Mobile Binge On), free mobile Internet access to specific edge providers (T-Mobile Music Freedom), and zero-rated or unlimited access to affiliated content (AT&T Data Free TV, Verizon go90, Comcast XFINITY Stream TV).
Abstract Zero-rating practices and associated throttling practices have been an issue of intense public policy debate. This article evaluates such practices under the Open Internet Order's transparency, no-throttling, and general conduct rules. The evaluation separately considers application-agnostic zero-rating, class-based zero-rating, edge provider-based zero-rating, and affiliated zero-rating. The article evaluates sponsored data programs (AT&T Sponsored Data, Verizon FreeBee Data), zero-rating and throttling of video streaming (T-Mobile Binge On), free mobile Internet access to specific edge providers (T-Mobile Music Freedom), and zero-rated or unlimited access to affiliated content (AT&T Data Free TV, Verizon go90, Comcast XFINITY Stream TV).
AbstractThere is considerable debate over whether and how net neutrality should apply to wireless networks. We address here whether differences between wired and wireless network technology merit different treatment with respect to net neutrality. The primary focus is on applications and traffic management, rather than device attachment. We first review the pertinent aspects of network architecture and discuss the main differences between wired and wireless networks, and find that wireless networks differ substantially from wired networks at the network layer and below. We then turn more specifically to how wired and wireless networks differ with respect to traffic management, and conclude that wireless networks require some different types of traffic management than wired networks. Finally, we turn to the question of how the differences in traffic management affect net neutrality, and find that despite the differences in traffic management, similar net neutrality concerns apply. Furthermore, we argue that since the differences lie in lower layers, net neutrality in both wired and wireless networks can be effectively accomplished by requiring an open interface between network and transport layers. We argue that this is a more streamlined and more effective solution that carving out a set of managed services.
Net neutrality represents the idea that Internet users are entitled to service that does not discriminate on the basis of source, destination, or ownership of Internet traffic. The United States Congress is considering legislation on net neutrality, and debate over the issue has generated intense lobbying. Congressional action will substantially affect the evolution of the Internet and of future Internet research. In this article, we argue that neither the pro nor anti net neutrality positions are consistent with the philosophy of Internet architecture. We develop a net neutrality policy founded on a segmentation of Internet services into infrastructure services and application services, based on the Internet's layered architecture. Our net neutrality policy restricts an Internet service Provider's ability to engage in anticompetitive behavior while simultaneously ensuring that it can use desirable forms of network management. We illustrate the effect of this policy by discussing acceptable and unacceptable uses of network management.
ABSTRACTProduction lines are often modeled as queueing networks with finite inventory between each stage. Little is known, however, about the average production rate and inventory levels when the service distribution at each stage is normal. This paper approximates the service distribution using iterative methods rather than simulation. The results show that iterative methods are useful when the problem is small and that approximation of the service distribution, by another distribution with the same mean and variance, is valid for steady‐state results such as average production rate or average inventory level.
Abstract What is the future of "Carterfone" style device attachment rules for a converged broadband network? The authors predict that American rules governing device attachment will become unsustainable as network technologies converge, and that a unified statute regarding device attachment will become necessary. They posit that end users will increasingly expect the functionality of the mobile Internet to resemble that of the fixed Internet. Current telecommunications law results in very different requirements depending on the type of network over which service is provided. This article explores the application of a previously proposed set of statutory provisions regarding device attachment to multiple scenarios. The authors find that a combination of an "any device" rule with provisions on device interconnection, device subsidies, and reasonable network management can effectively address the range of likely scenarios.