Suchergebnisse

Self-regulation in industrial systems is an efficient tool to ensure the well-being of consumers and save limited costs of state regulation via more flexible, effective and faster engagement into business activities. Depending on a particular context, various forms of selfregulation develop, where governmental institutions often perform their role. The problematic of application of regulation and self-regulation, by presenting the variety of self-regulation forms and theoretical parameters of dilemma of regulation vs. self-regulation are analyzed in this article. It has to be emphasized that the purpose of both regulation and self-regulation is to maintain the well-being of any member of society, thus the harmony between state regulation and self-regulation is a prerequisite of successful management of complex contemporary phenomena.

Self-regulation in industrial systems is an efficient tool to ensure the well-being of consumers and save limited costs of state regulation via more flexible, effective and faster engagement into business activities. Depending on a particular context, various forms of self-regulation develop, where governmental institutions often perform their role. The problematic of application of regulation and self-regulation, by presenting the variety of self-regulation forms and theoretical parameters of dilemma of regulation vs. self-regulation are analyzed in this article. It has to be emphasized that the purpose of both regulation and self-regulation is to maintain the well-being of any member of society, thus the harmony between state regulation and self-regulation is a prerequisite of successful management of complex contemporary phenomena. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5755/j01.ppaa.13.3.8303 ; Savireguliacija industrinėse sistemose veikia kaip veiksminga priemonė, užtikrinanti vartotojų gerovę lanksčiau, greičiau ir efektyviau vykdyti veiklą ir sutaupanti ribotus valstybinio reguliavimo kaštus. Atsižvelgiant į esamą kontekstą, savireguliacija įgyja įvairias išraiškas, kuriose neretai valstybinės valdžios institucijos irgi atlieka savo vaidmenį. Šiame straipsnyje, pateikiant savireguliacijos formų įvairovę ir savireguliacijos bei reguliacijos dilemos industrinėje sistemoje teorinius parametrus, yra aptariama reguliavimo ir savireguliacijos taikymo problematika. Darbe remiamasi požiūriu, kad tiek reguliavimo, tiek savireguliacijos paskirtis yra užtikrinti kiekvieno visuomenės nario gerovę, taigi valstybinio reguliavimo ir savireguliacijos darna yra sėkmingo kompleksinių šiuolaikinio pasaulio reiškinių valdymo prielaida. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5755/j01.ppaa.13.3.8303

Self-regulation in industrial systems is an efficient tool to ensure the well-being of consumers and save limited costs of state regulation via more flexible, effective and faster engagement into business activities. Depending on a particular context, various forms of selfregulation develop, where governmental institutions often perform their role. The problematic of application of regulation and self-regulation, by presenting the variety of self-regulation forms and theoretical parameters of dilemma of regulation vs. self-regulation are analyzed in this article. It has to be emphasized that the purpose of both regulation and self-regulation is to maintain the well-being of any member of society, thus the harmony between state regulation and self-regulation is a prerequisite of successful management of complex contemporary phenomena.

Self-regulation in industrial systems is an efficient tool to ensure the well-being of consumers and save limited costs of state regulation via more flexible, effective and faster engagement into business activities. Depending on a particular context, various forms of selfregulation develop, where governmental institutions often perform their role. The problematic of application of regulation and self-regulation, by presenting the variety of self-regulation forms and theoretical parameters of dilemma of regulation vs. self-regulation are analyzed in this article. It has to be emphasized that the purpose of both regulation and self-regulation is to maintain the well-being of any member of society, thus the harmony between state regulation and self-regulation is a prerequisite of successful management of complex contemporary phenomena.

Self-regulation in industrial systems is an efficient tool to ensure the well-being of consumers and save limited costs of state regulation via more flexible, effective and faster engagement into business activities. Depending on a particular context, various forms of selfregulation develop, where governmental institutions often perform their role. The problematic of application of regulation and self-regulation, by presenting the variety of self-regulation forms and theoretical parameters of dilemma of regulation vs. self-regulation are analyzed in this article. It has to be emphasized that the purpose of both regulation and self-regulation is to maintain the well-being of any member of society, thus the harmony between state regulation and self-regulation is a prerequisite of successful management of complex contemporary phenomena.

This article analyses the concept, content, and historical experiences of strategic planning in modern economic policy-making. It does so also through the analysis of the case of Lithuania, which has recently undergone transformation from the centrally planned to the fully functioning market economy and now faces new challenges as a member-to-be of the European Union.

This article analyses the concept, content, and historical experiences of strategic planning in modern economic policy-making. It does so also through the analysis of the case of Lithuania, which has recently undergone transformation from the centrally planned to the fully functioning market economy and now faces new challenges as a member-to-be of the European Union.

This article analyses the concept, content, and historical experiences of strategic planning in modern economic policy-making. It does so also through the analysis of the case of Lithuania, which has recently undergone transformation from the centrally planned to the fully functioning market economy and now faces new challenges as a member-to-be of the European Union. The central thesis of this article is that the long-term competitiveness of the Lithuanian economy will be determined by its "micro" or enterprise-level policies, which, according to the effectiveness of implementation, will much depend on the capacity of Lithuanian institutions to manage the dilemmas of EU industrial policy.

This article analyses the concept, content, and historical experiences of strategic planning in modern economic policy-making. It does so also through the analysis of the case of Lithuania, which has recently undergone transformation from the centrally planned to the fully functioning market economy and now faces new challenges as a member-to-be of the European Union. The central thesis of this article is that the long-term competitiveness of the Lithuanian economy will be determined by its "micro" or enterprise-level policies, which, according to the effectiveness of implementation, will much depend on the capacity of Lithuanian institutions to manage the dilemmas of EU industrial policy.

This article analyses the concept, content, and historical experiences of strategic planning in modern economic policy-making. It does so also through the analysis of the case of Lithuania, which has recently undergone transformation from the centrally planned to the fully functioning market economy and now faces new challenges as a member-to-be of the European Union.

This article analyses the concept, content, and historical experiences of strategic planning in modern economic policy-making. It does so also through the analysis of the case of Lithuania, which has recently undergone transformation from the centrally planned to the fully functioning market economy and now faces new challenges as a member-to-be of the European Union.

This article analyses the concept, content, and historical experiences of strategic planning in modern economic policy-making. It does so also through the analysis of the case of Lithuania, which has recently undergone transformation from the centrally planned to the fully functioning market economy and now faces new challenges as a member-to-be of the European Union. The central thesis of this article is that the long-term competitiveness of the Lithuanian economy will be determined by its "micro" or enterprise-level policies, which, according to the effectiveness of implementation, will much depend on the capacity of Lithuanian institutions to manage the dilemmas of EU industrial policy.

This article analyses the concept, content, and historical experiences of strategic planning in modern economic policy-making. It does so also through the analysis of the case of Lithuania, which has recently undergone transformation from the centrally planned to the fully functioning market economy and now faces new challenges as a member-to-be of the European Union.