In: Otjes , S & Krouwel , A 2019 , ' Why do newcomers vote for a newcomer? Support for an immigrant party ' , Journal of ethnic and migration studies , vol. 45 , no. 7 , pp. 1148-1167 . https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2018.1427053 ; ISSN:1369-183X
This article studies the voters of DENK, the first immigrant party to gain seats in a national parliament. It builds further on the existing literature on how immigrants and people from immigrant descent vote in Western European countries. From the literature the authors derive seven expectations about the kind of voters that are likely to vote for an immigrant party in terms of their political cynicism, attitudes towards economic, globalisation and moral issues. We find that DENK voters are younger Muslims, who have conservative views on moral matters, cynical attitudes towards politics, right-wing views on economic matters and progressive views on issues that pertain to the globalisation dimension, such as immigration, integration and Islam and in particular discrimination. This article uses VAA data to construct a matched sample that in terms of key variables is representative for voters with and without a migration background.
In: Otjes , S & Krouwel , A 2018 , ' Old Voters on New Dimensions : Why Do Voters Vote for Pensioners' Parties? The Case of the Netherlands ' , Journal of Aging and Social Policy , vol. 30 , no. 1 , pp. 24-47 . https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2017.1363589 ; ISSN:0895-9420
This article analyzes the electoral support of the Dutch pensioners' party 50Plus. Due to its open electoral system and aging population, the Netherlands is a key case to study pensioners' parties. Our study shows that this pensioners' party appeals to voters who are characterized by their age and their dependence on the welfare state as well as their policy positions on new lines of political conflict. In particular, their position on the new economic dimension (which concerns welfare state reform) and the new cultural dimension (which concerns immigration and EU integration) is distinct. Moreover, even when the majority of voters for this new party once supported the larger mainstream parties, they are now dissatisfied with the established politics. With rapidly aging populations across established democracies, this study is not just relevant for those studying pensioners' parties, but rather gives an important insight into the electoral dynamics and popular support for mainstream politics, the welfare state, and social security.
In: Otjes , S & Krouwel , A 2015 , ' Two shades of Green? The electorates of GreenLeft and the Party for the Animals ' , Environmental Politics , vol. 24 , no. 6 , pp. 991-1013 . https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2015.1067349 ; ISSN:0964-4016
The Netherlands has two electorally significant parties that might be considered to be part of the Green' family: GreenLeft and the Party for the Animals. These two parties appeal to different niches of the Green electorate, identified on the basis of issue dimensions, demographics, and their trust in government. GreenLeft tends to attract voters from the traditional Green niche: those with egalitarian, cosmopolitan, environmentalist, and libertarian values. The Party for the Animals attracts another type of Green voter: significantly less cosmopolitan and evincing lower levels of political trust.
In the spring of 2005, the European Union was plunged into a state of crisis when two of the Union's founding members (France and the Netherlands) rejected the proposed EU Constitution in two separate referendums. In this article, it is argued that the 'no' votes in both countries, despite the support of mainstream political elites and the bulk of the media, should not be viewed with surprise. The article begins by examining the background debate to the referendums in both countries before considering the major issues that dominated the 'no' campaigns as well as the issues that motivated the two countries' electorates in their decisions to reject the EU Constitution. From here, the article examines the significance of the 2005 'no' votes in the current context within France and the Netherlands and argues that the clear polarization of the 'no' vote among those from socio-economically less well-off backgrounds is not only the sign of a further widening of the gap between mainstream political elites and their supporters with regard to European integration, but that in turn it is also having a significant impact at a party level in terms of the galvanization of Eurosceptic political parties -- particularly the radical right. The article concludes with the argument that 2005 has contributed to the growing salience of Euroscepticism within both countries, which in the context of the crisis in the eurozone is likely to lead to further re-evaluation of the European project among political elites. Adapted from the source document.
Explores the evolution toward presidentialization in the "Low Countries" (Belgium & the Netherlands) where heterogeneous societies have produced democracies characterized by broad multi-party coalitions, numerous power-sharing devices, & weak checks & balances. Although the logic of consensus democracies would appear to inhibit the process of presidentialism, the power of party leaders & prime ministers has recently increased in both countries, resulting in a shift toward "presidentialized parliamentary systems." Special attention is given to ways in which the consensual policy process & intra-cabinet decision-making have provided skillful prime ministers with opportunities to gradually increase their autonomy. The decision-making autonomy of Dutch & Belgian premiers has also been bolstered by the enlargement & professionalization of the prime ministerial office. Although the position of the prime minister has been significantly strengthened in the Low Countries, the trend toward presidentialization has had a greater effect in the Netherlands while the federal structure & linguistic cleavage in Belgium have kept that country's political system more balanced. 85 References. J. Lindroth
AbstractThis article seeks to explain why electoral support for the Venezuelan opposition has increased substantially, using Venezuelan public opinion survey data from LAPOP and an opt-in sample collected through the online vote advice application Brújula Presidencial Venezuela. It analyzes why Venezuelans who had either voted for Chávez or abstained in 2006 defected and started to support the opposition in subsequent elections. It proposes several reasons: negative voter evaluations of the economy, concern for public safety, and dissatisfaction with Venezuelan democracy. While the finding that negative policy evaluations boost support for the opposition aligns with theoretical expectations, this study finds a strong relationship between having different evaluations of the quality of democracy and supporting Chávez, which shows that the advocacy of two competing visions of democracy by the incumbent and the opposition also affects voting patterns in Venezuela.
This is a chapter in Dutch from the book, Democratie Doorgelicht, het functioneren van de Nederlandse democratie. The web page is at: http://www.lup.nl/product/democratie-doorgelicht/