Review of John Mutakha Kangu's Constitutional Law of Kenya on Devolution (Strathmore University Press, Nairobi, 2015)
In: Strathmore Law Journal, Band 2, Heft 1 213-220
20 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Strathmore Law Journal, Band 2, Heft 1 213-220
SSRN
In: Africa Journal of Comparative Constitutional Law, Vol. 1 (2016)
SSRN
In: in Morris Mbondenyi, Evelyne Asaala, Tom Kabau and Attiya Waris (eds), Human Rights and Democratic Governance in Kenya: A Post 2007 Appraisal (Pretoria University Law Press, Pretoria 2015) 83-117
SSRN
In: Journal of conflict and security law, Band 16, Heft 3, S. 558-558
ISSN: 1467-7954
In: Goettingen Journal of International Law, Band 4, Heft 1 49-92
SSRN
In: Journal of Conflict and Security Law, Band 16, Heft 3, S. 558-561
SSRN
In: in Ilias Bantekas, Francesco Seatzu and Katerina Akestoridi (eds), Sustainable Development Goals: A Commentary (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2023)
SSRN
This thesis examines the legal and political dilemmas in the implementation of the African Union's (AU) 'right' of forceful intervention through a systemic method of analysis. It first addresses the question of whether the AU's intervention system represents a paradigm shift in international law on intervention and the authorization role of the United Nations. It examines whether there is a justifiable basis for the implementation of the AU's intervention mandate outside the UN system, while taking into account the necessity of the international rule of law. It then analyzes the manner in which the failure to institutionalize the concept of sovereignty as responsibility within the AU system has contributed to the Union's failure to implement its intervention mandate even within the UN system. The AU's legal framework expressly grants the Union the mandate to forcefully intervene in a member state in situations of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes. However, the failure of the AU's legal framework to explicitly require authorization by the Security Council for intervention (as required by the UN Charter) has led to uncertainty on the envisaged implementation mechanism, including allegations of its inconsistency with the UN Charter and international law. The Security Council may, however, be ineffective in granting authorization due to the use of the veto. There is, therefore, the question of whether the AU's legal framework exemplifies the crystallization of a customary law permitting humanitarian intervention, or is consensual (since African states have agreed by treaty to such intervention) and consequently, Security Council authorization is not mandatory. The core argument of this thesis is that although the necessity for the international rule of law restricts African Union's forceful interventions to United Nations authorized enforcement action, robust intervention by the Union within that framework is compromised by a systemic failure of institutionalization of the concept of sovereignty as responsibility. This thesis recommends that for robust implementation of the African Union's intervention mandate within the UN system, alternative authorization from the General Assembly be sought where the Security Council is ineffective. However, implementation of the AU's intervention mandate within the UN framework is compromised by continued concerns of protecting traditional concepts of unfettered sovereignty. This is evident in non-intervention oriented clauses within the AU's legal framework (which negate the intervention mandate) and the Union's practice of opposing forceful interventions like in the case of Libya. Possible solutions to that predicament are examined. A systemic method of analysis is utilized in this thesis since there is an interaction of various legal norms within the AU system, in addition to the system's interaction with environmental factors such as politics and increasing global interdependence, while it is also subject to the UN and international law systems. The significance of the research is in identifying legal, policy and contextual factors that can transform the AU into an effective regional mechanism for institutionalization of the rule of law within the African region (by deterring gross human rights violations) while safeguarding the values of the international rule of law. ; published_or_final_version ; Law ; Doctoral ; Doctor of Philosophy
BASE
In: (2019) 9(3) Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property 303-325
SSRN
In: (2018) 26(4) African Journal of International and Comparative Law 616-638
SSRN
In: Journal of international humanitarian legal studies, Band 5, Heft 1-2, S. 70-104
ISSN: 1878-1527
The Sphere Humanitarian Charter, a self-regulation instrument of humanitarian non-State actors, establishes principles and minimum standards in the provision of humanitarian assistance in select vital life-saving relief activities, especially in nutrition and health. The Charter articulates principles and minimum standards for facilitating the achievement of rights and obligations enshrined in various international legal "soft law" instruments. Due to the multiplicity of international legal instruments, the Sphere Charter provides a tool for a coherent understanding and application of relevant obligations, and therefore increases accountability and efficiency. The Sphere Charter bold human rights based approach to humanitarian assistance, including its articulation of a right to receive humanitarian assistance, may contribute to the evolution of the international legal regime into a more "victim centered" system. The central argument postulated in this article is that although the Sphere Charter is not a binding legal instrument, it has significant normative value that may contribute to progressive developments in the legal regime governing humanitarian assistance, and is particularly helpful in improving accountability and quality in the provision of nutrition and health relief. The Sphere Charter framework for local participation is particularly viewed as significant in engendering accountability in relief activities.
In: Africa Nazarene University Law Journal, Band 1, Heft 1 36-55.
SSRN
In: Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa, Band 44, Heft 3
SSRN
In: in Ilias Bantekas, Pietro Ortolani, Shahla Ali, Manuel Gómez and Michael Polkinghorne, UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration: A Commentary (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2020) 628-654
SSRN
In: in Ilias Bantekas, Pietro Ortolani, Shahla Ali, Manuel Gómez and Michael Polkinghorne, UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration: A Commentary (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2020) 435-452
SSRN