Abbreviations --. - Introduction: Women's rights in an African Muslim democracy --. - A French colonial legacy : the making of Niger's legal system --. - The puzzle of non-adoption : why Niger has no family code --. - Bargaining for women's representation : the adoption of a gender quota --. - Bringing rights home : how Niger ratified CEDAW and rejected the Maputo Protocol --. - Conclusion: Rethinking women's activism --. - Appendix: Research methods --. - Acknowledgments --. - Notes --. - Bibliography --. - Index
In: The journal of modern African studies: a quarterly survey of politics, economics & related topics in contemporary Africa, Band 56, Heft 2, S. 367-368
By asserting that oil, not Islam, hurts gender equality, Michael Ross (2008) has made an important contribution to the debate on whether Islam bodes ill for women (Fish 2002; Inglehart and Norris 2003; Spierings, Smits, and Verloo 2009). Ross suggests that oil production decreases the number of female workers in countries with occupational segregation. The more women are left out of the formal economy, the fewer opportunities and resources they have for becoming influential political constituencies. According to Ross, "[t]his leaves oil-producing states with atypically strong patriarchal cultures and political institutions" (p. 107). Employing the same set of countries and data used in Ross (2008), I show that the institution of gender quotas, which is omitted from his statistical analyses, offsets the effects of oil rents on women's political representation. Gender quotas increase women's representation in Muslim majority and non-Muslim majority countries and in countries that are oil rich and oil poor. That "petroleum perpetuates patriarchy" (p. 120) is a tendency, not destiny.