Introduction -- The changing identities of Taiwan's plains indigenous people -- Seeking "roots" in Taiwan: "Red Hair" and the Dutch Princess of Eight Treasures -- Languages under colonization: the Taiwanese language movement -- Taiwanese youth and national identity under Ma Ying-jeou -- Lee Teng-hui and the formation of Taiwanese identity -- Cyberspace and the rise of Taiwanese identity -- Wang Shi: changes in the national identification of a third generation mainlander under Ma Ying-jeou
Cover -- Half Title -- Series Page -- Title Page -- Copyright Page -- Dedication -- Table of Contents -- List of illustrations -- List of contributors -- Preface -- Acknowledgments -- Chapter 1: Introduction: Understanding historical (in)justice, while moving toward Indigenous justice and reconciliation -- Taiwanese indigenous history: a brief introduction -- Exploring the concept of transitional justice -- The basics of transitional justice -- Locating Justice and Injustice through the theories of Iris M. Young -- Transitional justice in Taiwan -- The PingPu peoples' indigenous status and rights claims -- About this book -- Notes -- References -- Part 1: Territory and sovereignty -- Chapter 2: Demarcation of Indigenous traditional territories: A wrong turn toward reconciliation -- Requirements for confirming Traditional Territories -- Indigenous Lands -- Indigenous Reserved Lands -- Traditional Territories of Indigenous Peoples -- Problems caused by un-demarcated Traditional Territories -- Controversy over the demarcation of traditional territories -- Simplifying the concept of Traditional Territory as property-like and with a rigid borderline -- Emphasizing the veto power and neglecting the procedural justice function of the consultation and consent rights -- Misinterpreting Indigenous collective rights and private property rights as mutually exclusive -- Conclusion -- Notes -- References -- Chapter 3: Extractive industry, traditional territory, and the politics of natural resources in Taiwan: The history and political economy of Indigenous land struggles in the Taroko area -- Indigenous peoples and the origins of land-related protest -- Indigenous people and the politics of natural resources -- The political economy of land rights struggles -- Conclusion -- Notes -- References.
Zugriffsoptionen:
Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
Some of the more than 75% of Minnesotans who rely on groundwater may find it in short supply in the face of population, land-use and climate change. Aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) is a technological approach to treat and inject clean water into an aquifer for temporary storage. The hydrogeological characteristics and the chemistry of the source water and aquifer impact treatment needs prior to injection and after extraction. Aquifer properties that control how water moves determine the volume and rate of water injected. This study examined four different kinds of aquifers across Minnesota with unique pressures to determine their suitability for ASR. The study findings suggest three may be suitable for ASR. The Buffalo aquifer in Moorhead has variable injection capacity and multiple sources of water for injection. Water quality issues of arsenic, sulfate, manganese, and hardness would require treatment after extraction. The Jordan aquifer in Rochester faces increased pressure from growth and nitrate contamination in the surrounding agricultural areas. The wastewater treatment plant could provide adequate source water if treated. Woodbury faces pressure from increasing population and PFAS contamination of the Jordan aquifer. ASR could recharge groundwater from wastewater treatment plants and also be integrated with PFAS remediation scenarios by reinjection of treated groundwater. ASR is not recommended for the surficial sand aquifer in the Straight River Groundwater Management area in north central Minnesota because there is no source of water to make it a feasible option at this time. Cost-benefit analysis combined with a sensitivity analysis of economic factors should be a component of ASR project feasibility. Modified state well code and a streamlined permitting path would allow more successful development and deployment of ASR. State adoption of control over Class V injection wells from the USEPA is also necessary. ; Funding for this project was provided by the Minnesota Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund as recommended by the Legislative-Citizen Commission on Minnesota Resources (LCCMR). The methodology developed in this study is also partly supported by a grant from the Future Research Program (2E27030) funded by the Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST). Etienne Bresciani acknowledges support from the Korea Research Fellowship program funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT through the National Research Foundation of Korea (grant 2016H1D3A1908042).