Suchergebnisse
Filter
12 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
SSRN
Working paper
Nepal's Accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO): Legislative Enactments in Compliance with the TRIPS Agreement
In: The Journal of World Intellectual Property, Band 7, Heft 6, S. 891-918
SSRN
Trademark Under the Nepalese Legal System: A Comparative Study with the TRIPS Agreement
In: The Annual Survey of International & Comparative Law, Vol. IX, 111- 134 (2003)
SSRN
Issue of Invocability of Provisions of the WTO Covered Agreements Before Domestic Courts
In: The Annual Survey of International & Comparative Law, Vol. XVII, 209- 224 (2011)
SSRN
Note on Cambodia's and Nepal's Accession to the World Trade Organization
In: The Annual Survey of International & Comparative Law, Vol. 10: Iss. 1, Article 8 (2004)
SSRN
Globalization and Least-Developed Countries
In: Chima Centus Nweze, ed, Contemporary Issues on Public International and Comparative Law: Essays in Honor of Prof. Christian Nwachukwu Okeke (USA: Vandeplas publishing, Feb. 2009) Chapter III, 75-92
SSRN
Nepal's Accession to WTO and Nepalese Legislation Required to Give Effect to WTO Covered Agreements
In: Theses and Dissertations, Paper 37, 2005
SSRN
Disharmonization in the Regulation of Transgenic Plants in Europe
In: Biotechnology Law Report Volume 38, Number 6, 2019
SSRN
Agriculture under threat — A crisis Of confidence? The solution: Redefine adventitious presence maximum levels from zero to zero++
The issue of Adventitious Presence (AP) of genes, those that are not "naturally" present in food and crops but rather have been placed there using recombinant deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) technology, has become a hot issue for producers and consumers. It can also be a major problem for exporters. Part of this problem is the reality that zero presence is now impossible to guarantee in some crops and products. Pressure has arisen to establish a Low Level Presence (LLP) threshold, one that is above zero, to be determined at an international level. This would allow crops to be imported and exported without the AP genes being approved in the importing country if they are approved in another country. The realityof biotechnological innovation in crops is that it is inevitable that there will be gene "flow" between varieties. This article examines the background of AP, the current state of policy and legislation, and why this has become contentious for producers, importers and exporters. This article examines the Canadian position towards AP as an illustration of a nation that produces many agricultural products based on genetically modified crops.
BASE
The World Trade Organization Obligations and Legislative Policy: Choices in Developing Countries for Biotechnology
In: CURRENTS: INT'L TRADE L. J., Winter 2013, USA, pp. 13-26
SSRN
The Australian Biotechnology Regulatory Framework: Issues Concerning Adventitious Presence (AP), Co-Existence, Liability and Coherence
In: The Search for Environmental Justice, Edited by Paul Martin, Sadeq Z. Bigdeli, Trevor Daya-Winterbottom, Willemien du Plessis and Amanda Kennedy, Edward Elgar Publishing, July 2015
SSRN
Disharmonization in the Regulation of Transgenic Plants in Europe
In the European Union (EU), anti-GMO (genetically modified organisms) groups have a strong presence. The EU market is not favorable to GM products. Retailers are hesitant to sell products with GM labelling. Conventional and organic farmers, environmentalists, and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) are working to enlarge GM-free zones. Although there are scientific societies arguing for the benefits of biotechnology or GMOs, many major EU member states like Italy, France, and Germany have banned GM maize crop for cultivation.
BASE