Suchergebnisse

The aim of the article is to prepare an analysis in order to formulate propositions regarding the digitalisation of Polish criminal proceedings as regards the administration of justice. These hypotheses would have merited consideration even pre-pandemic, but they demand even more attention as a result of the pandemic. The pandemic has served to highlight the pre-existing necessity to adapt criminal law to the latest observable technical and technological advances. In light of the above, the first issue to be analysed concerns the conditions, procedures, and possibilities surrounding the collection of evidence electronically, taking into account the most recent relevant guidelines of the Council of Europe. The second issue to be examined will be the adaptation of criminal procedures, including Polish, to the standards stipulated in the Convention of the Council of Europe on Cybercrime of 23 November 2001, in light of national norms regarding evidence gathering. The third issue that will be assessed in this study will be the benefits, risks, or potential of the application of artificial intelligence algorithms in criminal procedure. The consideration of each of the three areas will have regard to the present global pandemic. The article concludes with a concise summary containing the authors' conclusions and propositions de lege ferenda. ; Karol Karski: k.karski@wpia.uw.edu.pl ; Bartłomiej Oręziak: b.oreziak@uksw.edu.pl ; Karol Karski is a Professor at the Department of International Public Law, Faculty of Law and Administration, University of Warsaw, Poland. ; Bartłomiej Oręziak is a PhD Candidate and an Assistant at the Department of Human Rights Protection and International Humanitarian Law, Faculty of Law and Administration, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University, Poland. ; Karol Karski - University of Warsaw, Poland ; Bartłomiej Oręziak - Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland ; André A., The Information Technology Revolution in Health Centre, (in :) A. André (ed.), Digital Medicine, Cham 2019. ; Boni B., Creating a Global Consensus Against Cybercrime, "Network Security" 2001, no. 9. ; Boratyńska K., M. Królikowski, Komentarz do art. 167, (in) A. Sakowicz (ed.), Kodeks postępowania karnego. Komentarz, Warszawa 2016. ; Bowrey K., Ethical Boundaries and Internet Cultures, (in:) L. Bently, S. Maniatis (eds.), Intellectual Property and Ethics, London 1998. ; Bradley C., Intent, Presumptions, and Non-Self-Executing Treaties, "The American Journal of International Law" 2008, no. 102(3). ; Brenner S., Schwerha J., Introduction-Cybercrime: A Note on International Issues, "Information Systems Frontiers" 2004, no. 6(2). ; Byrski J., Oprogramowanie zawierające elementy sztucznej inteligencji. Wybrane zagadnienia prawne, (in:) P. Kostański, P. Podrecki, T. Targosz (eds.), Experientia Docet. Księga jubileuszowa ofiarowana Pani Profesor Elżbiecie Traple, Warszawa 2017. ; Chłopecki A., Sztuczna inteligencja – szkice prawnicze i futurologiczne, Warszawa 2018. ; Clough J., A world of difference: The Budapest Convention on Cybercrime and the challenges of harmonization, "Monash University Law Review" 2014, no. 40(3). ; Coleman C., Security Cyberspace – New Laws and Developing Strategies, "Computer Law and Security Report" 2003, no. 19(2). ; Dębowski J., O klasycznej koncepcji prawdy i jej filozoficznych podstawach. Czy w Matrixie możliwa jest prawda?, (in:) A. Kiklewicz, E. Starzyńska-Kościuszko (eds.), Oblicza prawdy w filozofii, kulturze, języku, Olsztyn 2014. ; Elenko E., L. Underwood, D. Zohar, Defining digital medicine, "Nature biotechnology" 2015, no. 33(5). ; Filipkowski W., L. Picarella, Criminalizing Cybercrimes: Italian and Polish Experiences, "Białostockie Studia Prawnicze" 2021, no. 26(3). ; Gercke M., The Convention on Cybercrime, "Multimedia und Recht" 2004, no. 20. ; Grez P., Pacta sunt servanda, "Revista Actualidad Juridica" 2008, no. 18. ; Hofmański P., Wielka reforma Kodeksu postępowania karnego 2013, "Forum Prawnicze" 2013, no. 4(8). ; Jabłońska-Bonca J., O prawie, prawdzie i przekonywaniu, Koszalin 1999. ; Jackson J., Two methods of proof in criminal procedure, "The Modern Law Review" 1988, no. 51(5). ; Jankowska M., Podmiotowość prawna sztucznej inteligencji?, (in:) A. Bielska-Brodziak (ed.), O czym mówią prawnicy mówiąc o podmiotowości, Katowice 2015. ; Jodłowski J., Zasada prawdy materialnej w postępowaniu karnym. Analiza w perspektywie funkcji prawa karnego, Warszawa 2015. ; Judycki S., O klasycznym pojęciu prawdy, "Roczniki Filozoficzne" 2001, no. 49. ; Judycki S., Prawda i kryterium prawdy: korespondencja, koherencja, praktyka, "Kwartalnik Filozoficzny" 1999, no. 28. ; Karska E., Karna jurysdykcja krajowa a międzynarodowa, (in:) J. Kolasa (ed.), Współczesne sądownictwo międzynarodowe, Vol. II ("Wybrane zagadnienia prawne"), Wrocław 2010. ; Karska E., Międzynarodowe prawo karne, (in:) B. Hołyst, R. Hauser (eds.), Wielka Encyklopedia Prawa, vol. IV: J. Symonides, D. Pyć (eds.), Międzynarodowe prawo publiczne, Warszawa 2014. ; Katyal N., Criminal Law in Cyberspace, "University of Pennsylvania Law Review" 2001, no. 149(4). ; Klejnowska M., Kłak C., Sobolewski Z., Proces karny. Część ogólna, Warszawa 2011. ; Kmiecik R., Dowód ścisły w procesie karnym, Lublin 1983. ; Lessig L., Resnick P., Zoning Speech on the Internet: A Legal and Technical Model, "Michigan Law Review" 1999, no. 98(2). ; Lupton D., The digitally engaged patient: Self-monitoring and self-care in the digital health era, "Social Theory & Health" 2013, no. 11(3). ; Maceratini A., New Technologies between Law and Ethics: Some Reflections, "Białostockie Studia Prawnicze" 2021, no. 26(3). ; Marion N., Symbolic Policies in Clinton's Crime Control Agenda, "Buffalo Criminal Law Review" 1997, no. 1. ; Moitra S., Developing Policies for Cybercrime, "European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice" 2005, no. 3(3). ; Murzynowski A., Istota i zasady procesu karnego, Warszawa 1976. ; Nuth M., Taking Advantage of New Technologies: For and Against Crime Computer Law and Security Report, "Computer Law & Security Review" 2008, no. 24. ; Partridge D., A New Guide to Artificial Intelligence, New Jersey 1991. ; Paust J., Self-executing treaties, "The American Journal of International Law" 1988, no. 82(4). ; Reidenberg J., Technology and Internet Jurisdiction, "University of Pennsylvania Law Review" 2005, no. 153(6). ; Rejmaniak R., Bias in Artificial Intelligence Systems, "Białostockie Studia Prawnicze" 2021, no. 26(3). ; Renda A., Artificial Intelligence. Ethics, governance and policy challenges. Report of a CEPS Task Force, Brussels 2019. ; Resseguie D., Computer Searches and Seizure, "Cleveland State Law Review" 2000, no. 48(185). ; Shapiro A., The Internet, "Foreign Policy" 1999, no. 115. ; Shaw M., International Law, Leicester 2008. ; Silverman A., Mind, Machine, and Metaphor. An Essay on Artificial Intelligence and Legal Reasoning. Boulder, Colorado 1993. ; Socha E., Zakres włączenia katalogu zbrodni objętych jurysdykcją Międzynarodowego Trybunału Karnego do polskiego prawa karnego materialnego, "Przegląd Sejmowy" 2007, vol. XV, no. 5(82). ; Socha E., Stosunek jurysdykcji Międzynarodowego Trybunału Karnego do sądów krajowych, "Przegląd Czerwonokrzyski" 2002, no. 3–4. ; Speer L., Redefining Borders: The Challenges of Cybercrime, "Crime, Law and Social Change" 2000, no. 34. ; Stolz A., Congress and Capital Punishment: An Exercise in Symbolic Politics, "Law and Policy Quarterly" 1983, no. 5(2). ; Strogowicz M., Prawda obiektywna i dowody sądowe w radzieckim procesie karnym, Warszawa 1959. ; Swire P., Elephants and Mice Revisited: Law and Choice of Law on the Internet, "University of Pennsylvania Law Review" 2005, no. 153(6). ; Talimonchik V. P., The Prospects for the Recognition of the International Legal Personality of Artificial Intelligence, "Laws" 2021, no. 10(4)(85). ; Tang A., Tam A., Cadrin-Cheenevert B., Guest W., Chong J., Barfett J., Chepelev L., Cairns R., Ross J., Cicero M., Poudrette M., Jaremko J., Reinhold C., Gallix B., Gray B., Geis R., Canadian Association of Radiologists White Paper on Artificial Intelligence in Radiology, "Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal" no. 69(2). ; Waltoś S., Zasada prawdy materialnej, (in:) P. Wiliński (ed.), System Prawa Karnego Procesowego, Warszawa 2014. ; Wielec M., Wartości – Analiza z perspektywy osobliwości postępowania karnego, Lublin 2017. ; Winick R., Searches and seizures of computers and computer data, "Harvard Journal of Law & Technology" 1994, no. 8(1). ; Zajadło J., Teoretyczne i filozoficzno-prawne pojęcie prawdy, (in:) K. Kremens, J. Skorupka (eds.), Pojęcie, miejsce i znaczenie prawdy w procesie karnym, Wrocław 2013. ; 26 ; 6 ; 55 ; 69

The study presents selected issues related to the role of the national parliament in the implementation and execution of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR). It presents the specificity of the national law-making process as a system of ad hoc legislation, which to a small extent is a response to international obligations in the field of human rights.The study also attempts to examine the impact of the case law of the ECHR on the national legal system by analyzing the subsequent stages of the legislative process. It emphasizes the role of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe, whose task is to ensure that states do not overlook — by their actions or omissions — the effects of judgments. The study attempts to assess the degree of sensitisation and the increase of awareness regarding the significance of the standards of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (Convention) in the national institutions and executive and legislative authorities that actively cooperate with each other. The implementation of the guidelines of correct legislation in the context of human rights is an activity of entities involved in the law-making process which, taking into account the standards of national and international law, shape in a specific manner the situation of individuals as well as of all entities. Parliaments can hold the executive authorities accountable for the execution of obligations by means of various instruments, and thus many legal issues that were the subject of the judgments of the ECHR had significant impact on the legislative process and the undertaking of respective legislative actions towards bringing Polish legislation closer to the standards of the Convention. The Sejm (the Polish Lower House) and the Senate bear enormous responsibility for the quality of the adopted law; at the parliamentary stage the role of the Council of Ministers of the Republic of Poland becomes less leading, but not excluded. This is what determines the unique role of the dialogue between the executive and legislative authorities, which should finalize the vision of the legal regulations closer to human rights in a constructive manner.