Suchergebnisse

Ch. 1. Sammy meets the wolf : meet the characters who will decide the cases -- ch. 2. I'm not your monkey : loss of control with a difficult client -- ch. 3. Junk yard therapy : self-delusion and exploitation -- ch. 4. Rats! : warring colleagues -- ch. 5. The john : a predator at work and play -- ch. 6. The raid on Hollywood Boulevard : the professional role vs. the right to a private life -- ch. 7. Kill the boss : when clients threaten physical harm -- ch. 8. Broken : bartering gone bad -- ch. 9. Baby steps off a cliff : the slippery slope to sexual exploitation -- ch. 10. Car crash : a simple disclosure with unforeseen consequences -- ch. 11. Mad FAX : what not to do when clients don't pay -- ch. 12. The star catcher : the undoing of a troubled psychotherapist -- ch. 13. Vampire : countertransference exploding.

The bk provides a discussion of the ethical dilemmas that can arise in faculty interactions w/students as well as tips on how to avoid & deal with these predicaments when they occur. It focuses on common & gray areas rather than extreme & clear cut.

Whereas investigators have directed considerable criticism against Institutional Review Boards (IRBs), the desirable characteristics of IRBs have not previously been empirically determined. A sample of 886 experienced biomedical and social and behavioral scientists rated 45 descriptors of IRB actions and functions as to their importance. Predictions derived from organizational justice research findings in other work settings were generally borne out. Investigators place high value on the fairness and respectful consideration of their IRBs. Expected differences between biomedical and social behavioral researchers and other variables were unfounded. Recommendations are offered for educating IRBs to accord researchers greater respect and fair treatment.