Suchergebnisse
Filter
79 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
Learning from the RSPT mistakes: is reform still possible?
In: Australian journal of political science: journal of the Australasian Political Studies Association, Band 51, Heft 1, S. 134-149
ISSN: 1363-030X
Learning from the RSPT mistakes: is reform still possible?
In: Australian journal of political science, Band 51, Heft 1, S. 134-16
Multi-level and multi-arena governance: the limits of integration and the possibilities of forum shopping
In: International environmental agreements: politics, law and economics, Band 12, Heft 4, S. 327-342
ISSN: 1573-1553
Assessing Political Science Quality: 'Excellence in Research for Australia'
In: European political science: EPS, Band 11, Heft 4, S. 567-580
ISSN: 1682-0983
Profession: assessing political science quality: 'excellence in research for Australia'
In: European political science: EPS, Band 11, Heft 4, S. 567-580
ISSN: 1682-0983
The results from the first foray into the research quality in Australia, Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA), were released in 2011. This article critically assesses the methodology of ERA and its application to the discipline of political science. It uses two other assessments of research quality in the discipline to confirm that the results for political science provide a credible result, as the rank order of departments is broadly compatible with these earlier exercises. The article then shows how the overall assessments for disciplines reflect the methodology employed, and that the average score for the discipline does not provide a credible benchmark against political science globally. While research funding decisions within disciplines are likely to be made according to within-discipline ranks, the use of descriptors relating the numerical score to 'world class' have undervalued the quality of the discipline relative to other disciplines and this risks affecting the perceptions of policymakers and impacting funding for the discipline as a whole. Adapted from the source document.
Arenas of Power by Theodore J. Lowi
In: Australian journal of public administration, Band 68, Heft 4, S. 484-491
ISSN: 1467-8500
Environmental Politics
In: The Australian Study of Politics, S. 347-355
Arenas of Power by Theodore J. Lowi
In: Australian journal of public administration: the journal of the Royal Institute of Public Administration Australia, Band 68, Heft 4, S. 484-491
ISSN: 0313-6647
A new process for negotiating multilateral environmental agreements? The Asia–Pacific climate partnership beyond Kyoto
In: Australian journal of international affairs: journal of the Australian Institute of International Affairs, Band 60, Heft 2, S. 287-303
ISSN: 1465-332X
A new process for negotiating multilateral environmental agreements?: the Asia-Pacific climate partnership beyond Kyoto
In: Australian journal of international affairs: journal of the Australian Institute of International Affairs, Band 60, Heft 2, S. 287-303
ISSN: 1035-7718
World Affairs Online
The Rules of Federalism: Institutions and Regulatory Politics in the EU and Beyond
In: Australian journal of political science: journal of the Australasian Political Studies Association, Band 40, Heft 2, S. 329-330
ISSN: 1036-1146
Comparing Business and Public Interest Associability at the International Level
In: International political science review: the journal of the International Political Science Association (IPSA) = Revue internationale de science politique, Band 23, Heft 2, S. 175-186
ISSN: 1460-373X
The increasing importance of globalization has made representation in international arenas more important. Yet key factors affecting associability of business and public interest groups at that level are markedly different from those which apply at the level of the nation-state. This article will argue that the "privileged position of business" does not obtain at the transnational level, and that business frequently prefers the national route. ngos, on the other hand, enjoy greater influence international than they do at the national level, essentially because of the ways in which they can assist international organizations to overcome their governance deficits. Examining sectors such as chemicals and biotechnology, this article explores the factors affecting associability at the international level and suggests some consequences which follow from these observations for the development of policy in international arenas.
Comparing business and public interest associability at the international level
In: International political science review: IPSR = Revue internationale de science politique : RISP, Band 23, Heft 2: Towards global democracy?, S. 175-186
ISSN: 0192-5121
World Affairs Online
Comparing Business and Public Interest Associability at the International Level
In: International political science review: IPSR = Revue internationale de science politique : RISP, Band 23, Heft 2, S. 175-186
ISSN: 0192-5121