The following links lead to the full text from the respective local libraries:
Alternatively, you can try to access the desired document yourself via your local library catalog.
If you have access problems, please contact us.
28 results
Sort by:
In: Contemporary studies in idealism series
In this book, Daniel Patrick Kelly examines Kant's Critique of Pure Reason through the lens of historical contextualization and highlights the importance of Kant's "Transcendental Dialectic" in the greater justification of his overarching transcendental idealism.
SSRN
Working paper
In: 107 Iowa L. Rev. __ (2021)
SSRN
Working paper
In: 67 Florida Law Review Forum 85 (2015)
SSRN
In: 45 University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform 855 (2012)
SSRN
SSRN
In: RESEARCH HANDBOOK ON THE ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF PROPERTY LAW, Kenneth Ayotte & Henry E. Smith, eds., Edward Elgar Publishing, 2011
SSRN
In: Peacebuilding, p. 1-18
ISSN: 2164-7267
In: Social philosophy & policy, Volume 35, Issue 1, p. 54-76
ISSN: 1471-6437
Abstract:Our primary aim in this paper is to sketch a cognitive evolutionary approach for developing explanations of social change that is anchored in the psychological mechanisms underlying normative cognition and the transmission of social norms. We throw the relevant features of this approach into relief by comparing it with the self-fulfilling social expectations account developed by Bicchieri and colleagues. After describing both accounts, we argue that the two approaches are largely compatible, but that the cognitive evolutionary approach is well suited to encompass much of the social expectations view, whose focus on a narrow range of norms comes at the expense of the breadth the cognitive evolutionary approach can provide.
In: Journal of social philosophy, Volume 41, Issue 3, p. 293-322
ISSN: 1467-9833
In: Perspectives on politics, Volume 21, Issue 2, p. 519-532
ISSN: 1541-0986
The world has surpassed three million deaths from COVID-19, and faces potentially catastrophic tipping points in the global climate system. Despite the urgency, governments have struggled to address either problem. In this paper, we argue that COVID-19 and anthropogenic climate change (ACC) are critical examples of an emerging type of governance challenge: severe collective action problems that require significant individual behavior change under conditions of hyper-partisanship and scientific misinformation. Building on foundational political science work demonstrating the potential for norms (or informal rules of behavior) to solve collective action problems, we analyze more recent work on norms from neighboring disciplines to offer novel recommendations for more difficult challenges like COVID-19 and ACC. Key insights include more attention to 1) norm-based messaging strategies that appeal to individuals across the ideological spectrum or that reframe collective action as consistent with resistant subgroups' pre-existing values, 2) messages that emphasize both the prevalence and the social desirability of individual behaviors required to address these challenges, 3) careful use of public policies and incentives that make individual behavior change easier without threatening norm internalization, and 4) greater attention to epistemic norms governing trust in different information sources. We conclude by pointing out that COVID-19 and climate change are likely harbingers of other polarized collective action problems that governments will face in the future. By connecting work on norms and political governance with a broader, interdisciplinary literature on norm psychology, motivation, and behavior change, we aim to improve the ability of political scientists and policymakers to respond to these and future collective action challenges.
In: Journal of neurological surgery. Part A, Central European neurosurgery = Zentralblatt für Neurochirurgie, Volume 73, Issue 6, p. 351-357
ISSN: 2193-6323
In: Journal of neurological surgery. Part A, Central European neurosurgery = Zentralblatt für Neurochirurgie, Volume 75, Issue 1, p. 042-047
ISSN: 2193-6323