Interpersonal perception: a social relations analysis
In: Distinguished contributions in psychology
58 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Distinguished contributions in psychology
In: A journal of church and state: JCS, Band 65, Heft 2, S. 279-281
ISSN: 2040-4867
In: (2024) Yale Journal of Law and Humanities
SSRN
In: (2022) 17(1) Journal of Comparative Law 85
SSRN
In: New Essays on the Fish-Dworkin Debate (Hart, 2023)
SSRN
In: (2022) Law and Humanities (Forthcoming)
SSRN
In: European Constitutional Law Review (Forthcoming)
SSRN
In: Maria Cahill, Seán Ó Conaill, Colm O'Cinneide, Conor O'Mahony (eds) Constitutional Change and Popular Sovereignty: Populism, Politics and the Law in Ireland, Routledge, Forthcoming
SSRN
Working paper
SSRN
Working paper
In: Revista de investigações constitucionais, Band 5, Heft 3, S. 257
ISSN: 2359-5639
In: Personal relationships, Band 25, Heft 2, S. 160-170
ISSN: 1475-6811
The actor–partner interdependence model (APIM) has been widely successful and has become the default method for analyses of dyadic data in which both members of the pair have the same measurements. This article reviews the history of the development of the APIM, focusing on the original presentation of the model, a 1979 article by Kraemer and Jacklin. Also discussed are the topics of APIM patterns, whether the APIM is a dyadic model, and the automation of APIM analyses. Although the APIM is the most popular method for dyadic analysis, it should be recognized there are alternatives that should also be considered.
Abortion in Ireland is regulated by a constitutional provision that was inserted following a referendum in 1983. In May 2018, the Irish people, will voted to remove this provision from the Irish Constitution. In this paper, I examine the reasons for the insertion of the provision; the problems that emerged with it over time; the factors that motivated the campaign for change; and the gradual process of negotiating a proposed change within the political system. The paper concludes by drawing general lessons that might be derived about the about the costs and consequences of the Irish experience of making abortion into a matter of constitutional law and debating its removal. Though somewhat effective in blocking political opponents, constitutionalising abortion has had unexpected consequences: creating uncertainty; involving the judiciary in the regulation of abortion; and perhaps creating a tendency to elevate social and political issues to the constitutional level.
BASE
Abstract Abortion in Ireland is regulated by a constitutional provision that was inserted following a referendum in 1983. In May 2018, the Irish people, will voted to remove this provision from the Irish Constitution. In this paper, I examine the reasons for the insertion of the provision; the problems that emerged with it over time; the factors that motivated the campaign for change; and the gradual process of negotiating a proposed change within the political system. The paper concludes by drawing general lessons that might be derived about the about the costs and consequences of the Irish experience of making abortion into a matter of constitutional law and debating its removal. Though somewhat effective in blocking political opponents, constitutionalising abortion has had unexpected consequences: creating uncertainty; involving the judiciary in the regulation of abortion; and perhaps creating a tendency to elevate social and political issues to the constitutional level.
BASE
Abortion in Ireland is regulated by a constitutional provision that was inserted following a referendum in 1983. In May 2018, the Irish people, will voted to remove this provision from the Irish Constitution. In this paper, I examine the reasons for the insertion of the provision; the problems that emerged with it over time; the factors that motivated the campaign for change; and the gradual process of negotiating a proposed change within the political system. The paper concludes by drawing general lessons that might be derived about the about the costs and consequences of the Irish experience of making abortion into a matter of constitutional law and debating its removal. Though somewhat effective in blocking political opponents, constitutionalising abortion has had unexpected consequences: creating uncertainty; involving the judiciary in the regulation of abortion; and perhaps creating a tendency to elevate social and political issues to the constitutional level.
BASE