The current research direction is the Institute of Alternative Dispute Resolution procedures, many of which have existed in theory and practice for many centuries, others have appeared and have found their consolidation in the legislation of the Russian Federation relatively recently. The subject of the study of this article is the procedure of mediation, as an alternative way of resolving disputed issues. The study is to analyze the extent of the legislative settlement of the mediation procedure, as well as its application in everyday life. Thus, this article discusses the actual problems of using the procedure of mediation, the features of the Federal Law N193-FZ "On the Alternative Procedure for Settlement of Disputes with the Participation of Mediators (Mediation Procedure)", the ways of solving actual problems in practice.
Currently, the most pressing issues are the interaction of civil society and the state, manifested in its various forms and using various means. One of the forms of such interaction is legislative initiative. This article examines and analyzes the concept and significance of legislative initiative as a form of interaction between civil society and the state, identifies problems of legal regulation and further development of such interaction, suggests solving the identified problems.
Today the urgent direction of researches is the Institute of public (civil) examination in the legislative process, namely its order, structure and a form of carrying out. As an object of research public examination of bills and acts as a form of participation of civil society in lawmaking acts. The research represents the analysis of the degree of a legislative uregulirovannost of the procedure of conducting a public examination, use of its results at the completion of the bill, legal status of subjects of implementation of public examination. In this regard, a research objective is the analysis of the mechanism of realization of public examination as one of the kinds of specialized examinations of a definition of quality of bills. The principles of systemacity, complexity, objectivity, and also legalistic, comparative and legal methods of scientific knowledge of legal reality are the methodological basis for a research. On the basis of the conducted research where it is made scientifically based conclusions, among them, need of a specification of a feedback mechanism between the subject of public examination and lawmaking body for increase in effectiveness of public examination; an accurate regulation of terms of carrying out and a possibility of control of the accounting of the remarks specified in the expert opinion. In particular, the idea of the development of the federal law for the regulation of the public relations arising in the course of conducting public examination is offered. It was established that conducting public examination promotes active and effective cooperation between the public and the power in the major political sphere — legislative activity. And also, positive value of the Civic Chamber of the Russian Federation concerning its practice of conducting public examination was revealed that promotes ensuring continuous interaction of citizens with public authorities of all levels and local government bodies for identification, coordination and the accounting of certain requirements and ...
