Suchergebnisse
Filter
22 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
Motivations for public equity offers: an international perspective
In: NBER working paper series 11797
Supply Chain within Business Groups: Do Families Prefer Upstream or Downstream Firms?
In: European Corporate Governance Institute – Finance Working Paper No. 963/2024
SSRN
Policy Diffusion and Polarization Across U.S. States
In: NBER Working Paper No. w30142
SSRN
Do Analysts Herd? An Analysis of Recommendations and Market Reactions
In: NBER Working Paper No. w12866
SSRN
Working paper
SSRN
Working paper
Motivations for Public Equity Offers: An International Perspective
In: NBER Working Paper No. w11797
SSRN
Bottlenecks for Evidence Adoption
In: Journal of political economy
ISSN: 1537-534X
SSRN
Is Cross‐Listing a Commitment Mechanism?: The Choice of Destinations and Family Ownership
In: Corporate governance: an international review, Band 23, Heft 4, S. 307-330
ISSN: 1467-8683
AbstractManuscript TypeEmpiricalResearch Question/IssueThis paper examines whether firms choose destinations with stronger investor protection than those provided in their respective home markets after controlling for both firm‐specific and destination‐specific characteristics that affect the choice of cross‐listing destination.Research Findings/InsightsUsing data on cross‐listing decisions of firms from 28 home countries targeted toward nine destinations for the 1994–2008 period, we find that firms are more likely to cross‐list in foreign markets that are less protective of outside investors relative to the home country once we simultaneously control for relevant destination‐specific and firm‐specific characteristics. Such preference for weak protection is mostly driven by family firms, but not observed among non‐family firms.Theoretical/Academic ImplicationsThese results suggest that the widely accepted "bonding" hypothesis, which posits that firms which cross‐list in order to voluntarily commit themselves to higher disclosure standards, should be interpreted with caution. Rather, controlling families may choose to list in destinations with weaker protection to retain their private benefits.Practitioner/Policy ImplicationsThe findings imply that exchanges in countries with stronger investor protection may not be attractive for potential foreign clientele, especially firms controlled by families. To increase foreign listings in a given exchange, regulators should consider not only the benefits of tight regulations such as "bonding," but also their compliance costs.
A Survey of Research on the Corporate Governance of Korean Firms
In: Asian Review of Financial Research, Band 35, Heft 1, S. 151-213
SSRN
Do Corporations Retain Too Much Cash? Evidence from a Natural Experiment
In: Review of Financial Studies, accepted
SSRN
Working paper
A Survey of Research on the Corporate Governance of Korean Firms
In: European Corporate Governance Institute – Finance Working Paper No. 804/2021
SSRN
What Determines the Structure of Corporate Debt Issues?
In: NBER Working Paper No. w13706
SSRN
Macroeconomic Conditions and Capital Raising
In: NBER Working Paper No. w16941
SSRN