Journal of European Public Policy(JEPP) best paper prize 2016
In: Journal of European public policy, Band 23, Heft 2, S. 155-156
ISSN: 1466-4429
53 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Journal of European public policy, Band 23, Heft 2, S. 155-156
ISSN: 1466-4429
In: Policy sciences: integrating knowledge and practice to advance human dignity ; the journal of the Society of Policy Scientists
ISSN: 0032-2687
In: Policy studies journal: the journal of the Policy Studies Organization, Band 50, Heft 3, S. 527-552
ISSN: 1541-0072
In this article, we analyze dynamics of policy change from the perspective of Punctuated Equilibrium Theory (PET). In particular, we investigate how economic crises impact on patterns of policy change in policy areas that vary in terms of their proximity to economic matters: social, environmental, and morality policy. We make two contributions. First, we show that economic crises lead to more incrementalist patterns of policy change in crisis‐remote policy subsystems and make policy punctuations in these areas less likely. However, if such punctuations do occur, they tend to be particularly extreme. Second, we argue that the empirical implications of PET are best tested by separately analyzing variance as an indicator for incrementalism and degrees of freedom as an indicator for punctuations. The empirical analysis builds on two data sets capturing policy output changes in 13 European countries over a period of 34 years (1980–2013).
In: Regulation & governance, Band 14, Heft 2, S. 256-270
ISSN: 1748-5991
AbstractMorality policies evince a much closer relationship to religious doctrines than is the case in other policy areas and hence constitute a most likely case for the observation of religious effects on policymaking and regulatory change. Yet we still lack generally accepted answers to the questions of whether and how religion matters to morality policy. In this paper, we present a theoretical argument that helps to overcome the seemingly contradictory expectations derived from the secularization and religion matters hypotheses. We postulate a bottleneck effect of religious opposition: while religious influence matters most during early stages of the policy process when the problem definition of a moral issue is still in flux, it diminishes during later stages when the issue has made it onto the political agenda. We find evidence of the bottleneck effect in a dataset of policy permissiveness covering 26 countries and spanning 50 years for five morality policies (abortion, euthanasia, homosexuality, pornography, and same‐sex marriage). The data is analyzed via a multilevel model and using Bayesian inference.
In: International journal of public administration, Band 40, Heft 8, S. 637-648
ISSN: 1532-4265
In: Journal of comparative policy analysis: research and practice, Band 21, Heft 5, S. 499-517
ISSN: 1572-5448
In: Governance: an international journal of policy and administration, Band 31, Heft 1, S. 45-63
ISSN: 1468-0491
The question of whether or not religion accounts for variance in the governance of moral issues, between and within countries over time, has long been debated but never conclusively answered. A novel data set encompassing innovative measurements of state regulation of "life‐and‐death" issues and of the religious stratification of society enables us to answer why previous studies reached contradictory results. The time‐series cross‐sectional analysis of 26 countries over 50 years reveals that dominant religious denominations in society indeed influence state governance approaches regarding the issues of abortion and euthanasia. This denominational effect is shown to be contingent on the religiosity of a country's population, but independent from the formal state–church relationship. Lastly, it is shown that the religious effect has an inverse U‐shaped relationship with time, exposing the timeframe of analysis as decisive for inferences drawn in the study of morality policy.