Suchergebnisse
Filter
14 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
Tertium datur: Neue politische Konfliktformen wie sogenannte "hybride Kriege" bringen alte Legitimationsmuster unter Druck
In: Sicherheit und Frieden: S + F = Security and Peace, Band 34, Heft 2, S. 109-113
ISSN: 0175-274X
World Affairs Online
Tertium datur: Neue politische Konfliktformen wie sogenannte "hybride Kriege" bringen alte Legitimationsmuster unter Druck
In: Sicherheit & Frieden, Band 34, Heft 2, S. 109-113
Book Review: Martin Weitenberg: Der Begriff der Kausalität in der haftungsrechtlichen Rechtsprechung der Unionsgerichte: zugleich ein Beitrag zur Kohärenz der EU-Haftungssysteme
In: European Review of Private Law, Band 23, Heft 5, S. 917-922
ISSN: 0928-9801
Anwendbarkeit des humanitaren Volkerrechts im Israel-Palastina-Konflikt
In: Die Friedens-Warte: Journal of International Peace and Organization, Band 85, Heft 3, S. 128-129
ISSN: 0340-0255
Menschenrechte als Weltmission
In: Die Friedens-Warte: Journal of International Peace and Organization, Band 84, Heft 3, S. 133-135
ISSN: 0340-0255
Der gerechte Friede zwischen Pazifismus und gerechtem Krieg. Paradigmen der Friedensethik im Diskurs
In: Die Friedens-Warte: Journal of International Peace and Organization, Band 84, Heft 1, S. 147-150
ISSN: 0340-0255
Mainstreams in the Development of European Tort Law: A Front-Line Snapshot
In: The Geneva papers on risk and insurance - issues and practice, Band 31, Heft 2, S. 270-276
ISSN: 1468-0440
Cour de cassation française, 1 december 99 — responsabilité pour activites sportives
In: European Review of Private Law, Band 10, Heft 4, S. 529-546
ISSN: 0928-9801
The judgment of 1 December 1999 by the Court of Cassation relates to the responsibility of organisers of sport events, and more precisely, to that of users of go-cart circuits. This responsibility was relied upon by a go-cart driver who suffered an accident on a circuit of this type.
The judgment is classic in its principle: the Court of Cassation rules that organisers of sport activities have to guarantee the security of participants. However, this security obligation is limited to an "obligation of means". Thus, the organiser is only liable in case of defective means. Participants of this dangerous sport are supposed to have accepted its risks; that is why they cannot expect from the organiser to offer an absolute guarantee of safety. Moreover, as participants play an active role in the sport activity, they introduce an uncertain external factor into the organiser's security obligation: their own behaviour. The consequences are nevertheless potentially serious for the participant, because the participant is not entitled to compensation if the organiser cannot be proven to have been at fault. Only a very rigorous interpretation of the obligation of cautiousness and surveillance on the part of the organiser can avoid this result.
The judgment, being further proof of the difficulties arising from the distinction between obligation of means and obligation of result, is analysed in the following comments from the point of view of Austrian, Scottish and Spanish law.
Kampfdrohnen für die Bundeswehr?: Forum
In: Sicherheit und Frieden: S + F = Security and Peace, Band 31, Heft 3, S. 175-183
ISSN: 0175-274X
World Affairs Online
Kampfdrohnen für die Bundeswehr?
In: Sicherheit & Frieden, Band 31, Heft 3, S. 175-183
European Commission's Public Consultation on Civil Liability - Adapting Liability Rules to the Digital Age and Artificial Intelligence
SSRN