Suchergebnisse

International audience ; After having presented the definition of strategic management from which the contribution of FCS can be recognized, the article moves on to examine two issues closely related to the dynamics of knowledge production in this domain. The first issue is found within the space defined by the empirical and analytical dimensions and concerns the risks for the knowledge process brought about by an obsession with theoretical novelty. The second issue concerns the thematic content of strategic management research. This content can be viewed as structured along various dimensions, each of them being composed of a thematic couple, such as the one that associates organization and strategy. This thematic space, which can be thought of as orthogonal to the space defined by empirical and analytical dimensions, is where strategic management is invented, where oppositions emerge, and where the question of their synthesis can be raised. ; Après avoir présenté la définition à partir de laquelle peut être appréciée la contribution de FCS au management stratégique, cet article se structure autour de deux préoccupations qui ont trait à la dynamique de production des connaissances dans le champ. La première s'inscrit dans le plan défini par les dimensions empi-rique et analytique. Elle concerne le risque que l'obsession de la nouveau-té théorique fait courir au processus de connaissance. La seconde préoccupation touche au contenu thématique de la recherche en management stratégique. Constitué de couples, comme celui que forment organisation et stratégie, cet axe thématique, que l'on peut concevoir comme orthogonal aux dimensions empirique et analytique est le lieu où s'invente le management stratégique, où des oppositions se nouent et où se pose la question de leur éventuel dépasse-ment. Mots clés : management stratégique – revues scientifiques – politiques éditoriales – développement de la con-naissance – obsession pour la théorie.

International audience ; After having presented the definition of strategic management from which the contribution of FCS can be recognized, the article moves on to examine two issues closely related to the dynamics of knowledge production in this domain. The first issue is found within the space defined by the empirical and analytical dimensions and concerns the risks for the knowledge process brought about by an obsession with theoretical novelty. The second issue concerns the thematic content of strategic management research. This content can be viewed as structured along various dimensions, each of them being composed of a thematic couple, such as the one that associates organization and strategy. This thematic space, which can be thought of as orthogonal to the space defined by empirical and analytical dimensions, is where strategic management is invented, where oppositions emerge, and where the question of their synthesis can be raised. ; Après avoir présenté la définition à partir de laquelle peut être appréciée la contribution de FCS au management stratégique, cet article se structure autour de deux préoccupations qui ont trait à la dynamique de production des connaissances dans le champ. La première s'inscrit dans le plan défini par les dimensions empi-rique et analytique. Elle concerne le risque que l'obsession de la nouveau-té théorique fait courir au processus de connaissance. La seconde préoccupation touche au contenu thématique de la recherche en management stratégique. Constitué de couples, comme celui que forment organisation et stratégie, cet axe thématique, que l'on peut concevoir comme orthogonal aux dimensions empirique et analytique est le lieu où s'invente le management stratégique, où des oppositions se nouent et où se pose la question de leur éventuel dépasse-ment. Mots clés : management stratégique – revues scientifiques – politiques éditoriales – développement de la con-naissance – obsession pour la théorie.

The study of organisations gives rise to a scientific activity of this kind that some do not have to speak of jungle. Apparently unreliable and inhospital in the world, the organisations are also culpable by tribes who say themselves at war against each other, which therefore do not speak and, moreover, say that they are unable to communicate as much as their cultures are scattered. The ethnographs who have addressed the issue speak about incommunicabilite and paradigm warfare. There is a need to consult the practitioner, who is best placed at my disposal in the research field, and to discourage him from going further. The first aim of this article is to reassure it on two points. While it is true that the economic expansion is widespread, it has more advantages than inconnients, and secondly, it must not be overly impressed by the violence of demands and invectives, since to follow these enemies on their hunting grounds, it is clear that their practices differ less than they say. Educated on the state of the territory which he or she is preparing to cover, the reader is not always able to make the most of his or her presentation. The second part three of which should allow him to take full advantage of the adventure. The Commission invites him not to present a description or explanation, but to regard it as the two sides of the coin. The second requires him not to be left behind in a systematic manner and to take greater care of the circumstances likely to be aware of it. The truth calls on him to rely on the ideas which he is proposed to use as an explorer to do so in his own right. If he follows these three gles, the reader might well agree with Kurt Lewin that "there is nothing more useful than a good thing". ; International audience ; The study of organisations gives rise to a scientific activity of this kind that some do not have to speak of jungle. Apparently unreliable and inhospital in the world, the organisations are also culpable by tribes who say themselves at war against each other, which therefore ...