The European Convention and its Draft Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe: Appropriate answers to the Laeken questions?
In: Common Market Law Review, Band 40, Heft 6, S. 1315-1345
ISSN: 0165-0750
96 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Common Market Law Review, Band 40, Heft 6, S. 1315-1345
ISSN: 0165-0750
In: Berichte 2003,3
In: Umweltforschungsplan des Bundesministeriums für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit
In: Studies and Materials on the Settlement of International Disputes Series v.3
In: Archiv des öffentlichen Rechts, Band 148, Heft 4, S. 496
ISSN: 1868-6796
In: Zeitschrift für europarechtliche Studien: ZEuS, Band 26, Heft 1, S. 3-12
ISSN: 1435-439X
The EU can freeze Russian State and private assets as sanctions. This is justified as "countermeasure" to exert pressure upon Russia that it ends its criminal war of aggression. However, sanctions do not cover definitive measures; freezing cannot be considered as a first step to confiscation. Therefore, the Commission plans "active management" of the frozen assets in order to obtain net return while ensuring the return of the assets themselves. Moreover, assets can be confiscated by the Member States on the basis of criminal confiscation regimes which the Union can harmonize. Such confiscations generally require evidence of a specific criminal offence, typically through a conviction. In some cases, confiscation may also be possible without a criminal conviction provided that a court is satisfied that all the elements of a specific criminal offense, or at least a nexus with criminal activity, are present. To make possible more confiscations, the EU has created the new crime of violation or circumvention of sanctions. The idea is that the "proceeds" of such Euro-crimes would have to be transferred to the EU or to Ukraine. In any way, some nexus to a severe crime needs to be established for confiscations compatible with the rule of law.
In: In: International Tax Studies (ITAXS). - Amsterdam. - Vol. 2 (2019), no. 5 ; 9 p.
SSRN
In: Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht: ZaöRV = Heidelberg journal of international law : HJIL, Band 69, Heft 2, S. 275-288
ISSN: 0044-2348
World Affairs Online
In: Zeitschrift des Deutschen Juristinnenbundes: djbZ, Band 12, Heft 3, S. 138-142
ISSN: 2942-3163
In: Der Staat: Zeitschrift für Staatslehre und Verfassungsgeschichte, deutsches und europäisches öffentliches Recht, Band 44, S. 343-365
ISSN: 0038-884X
World Affairs Online
In: Der Staat: Zeitschrift für Staatslehre und Verfassungsgeschichte, deutsches und europäisches öffentliches Recht, Band 44, Heft 3, S. 343-365
ISSN: 0038-884X
In June 2004, at least three decisions of British, European, & American high courts dealt with the relationship of religion, state, & society, in particular the question of state tolerance or state neutrality with respect to religion. This article focuses on the question of laissez-ism & positive & negative religious freedom in public realms, focusing on the conflict between Christianity & Islam in the German state model of cooperation between church & state & the French & American model of separation of church & state. The English state religion model is not considered. It is only in a partnership-like cooperation between church, religious communities, & state that a transparent discourse over values can occur. Separation of church & state results in a loss of necessary cohesiveness & association to a value measured foundation & thereby avoids problems rather than solves them. L. Reed
In: Der Staat: Zeitschrift für Staatslehre und Verfassungsgeschichte, deutsches und europäisches öffentliches Recht, Band 44, Heft 3, S. 343-366
ISSN: 0038-884X
In: Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht: ZaöRV = Heidelberg journal of international law : HJIL, Band 64, Heft 3, S. 517-533
ISSN: 0044-2348
World Affairs Online