Suchergebnisse

In 2012 and 2015, Zbigniew Kobyliński's articles on valuing archaeological monuments and sites (the article of 2012 was co-authored by Jacek Wysocki) were printed in post-conference publications. Z. Kobyliński assumed that historic preservation officers can assess values of archaeological sites by basing on non-scientific criteria and the level of preservation of artifacts only. The author is also of the opinion that the criteria used for classifying and categorising both properties of special architectural and historic interest and works of arts cannot be applied to archaeological sites. This stems from the knowledge on full potential of archaeological monuments and sites being limited prior to conducting thorough analyses. According to Kobyliński, any value assessment results in negative selection of archaeological sites and therefore, it is of utmost importance to provide all resources with appropriate protection. The author of this article takes a different point of view. Assuming that there is 0.5 million sites entered into the Polish record of archaeological monuments and sites, Konopka is of the opinion that it is and will be impossible to provide all resources even with basic monitoring, not mentioning active care. He reckons that basing on the information collected by archaeologists, it is possible to nominate sites of outstanding potential. Analysing the records by applying the most innovative non-invasive methods may allow for selecting sites which should be provided with particular care in a certain region. Konopka calls for implementing a form in which past relics of outstanding historical value and features characteristic of archaeological sites would be listed. These would be useful in identifying the potential of the place to be protected. He suggests creating a card being of higher rank than the record. The information provided therein would be helpful in nominating properties and sites to be entered into the register of historic monuments and sites.

The article explores directions of possible changes to be made to the model of monument protection. It not only recommends specific provisions but also focuses on a model understood as a structure of definitions and relations existing among them. This allows for rough description of a selected aspect of reality. The analysis comes down to deliberations on monument protection system, including necessary duties and competences of government and local government administration bodies. Effects of the principle of subsidiarity and decentralisation of Polish historic preservation administration were brought into special focus. Additionally, narrow scope of duties was determined for state and local government administration bodies.

Grammatische Variation ist der Sprache inhärent und auch aus dem Standarddeutschen nicht wegzudenken. Man beobachtet, dass ein und dieselbe grammatische, semantische oder pragmatische Funktion mit unterschiedlichen grammatischen Mitteln realisiert wird, und umgekehrt, dass eine grammatische Struktur unterschiedliche Funktionen ausüben kann. Die Variation kann mit grammatikinternen Faktoren, grammatikexternen Parametern wie Medium oder Textsorte und außersprachlichen Dimensionen wie Zeit oder Raum korrelieren. In diesem Band werden zunächst verschiedene Perspektiven auf Variation fokussiert wie die historische, die laienlinguistische, die lernerorientierte, die geographische oder die medienorientierte Sicht. Im Weiteren wird in exemplarischen Studien gezeigt, wie grammatische Variation mit Methoden der Korpus-, Computer-, Psycho- und Neurolinguistik empirisch erschlossen wird. Schließlich werden ausgewählte Variationsphänomene aus den Bereichen Phonologie, Morphologie und Syntax analysiert, und es wird demonstriert, wie sich die aktuelle Grammatikforschung zwischen der immer weiter gehenden Spezifizierung von Variationsgründen und der Annahme der freien Variation sowie zwischen Empirie und Theorie hin- und herbewegt