Suchergebnisse

"This is the first book to examine the significance of European Union antitrust law for the future of sport in Europe. Drawing on multi-disciplinary perspectives from law, economics, sport management and politics, and including case studies about the European Super League (ESL) and the International Skating Union, the book explores key themes in contemporary sport, including governance, ownership and control; the European sport model; the regulatory autonomy of sports organisations; and the relationship between public policy, the law and sport. This is important reading for any advanced student, researcher, policy-maker or practitioner with an interest in sport management, sport law, European law or European politics"

This is the first book to investigate the significance of Brexit for sport, with a particular focus on the regulatory and legal challenges that it poses, and the economic and political stresses that are likely to follow in its wake.℗ Written by a team of leading researchers working across sport studies, legal studies and political science, and edited by an EU official with nearly two decades of experience working in EU sport policy, the book explains why regulation, and European dis-integration, matter to sport. It examines key topics including free movement, state aid and labour law, and considers the interests of key stakeholders from fans to football clubs to governing bodies.℗ This is an essential reference for any advanced student, researcher, policy maker, administrator or industry professional working in sport, international law, political science, or international business and management.

Wie konsolidierte die Europäische Kommission das neue Politikfeld Sport in den Jahren vom Austritt aus der Welt-Anti-Doping-Agentur bis zum Inkrafttreten des Vertrags von Lissabon und dessen Implementierung (2001-2011)? Hatte zwischenzeitlich die Sportpolitik der EU-Mitgliedstaaten angefangen sich zu zentralisieren, zu föderalisieren bzw. zu europäisieren? Oder lag vielmehr ein erneutes Beispiel jenes "Spill-Overs" vor, bei dem bereits im EU-Rahmen eingeleitete Prozesse weitgehend unvorhergesehene (wenn nicht sogar unbeabsichtigte) Konsequenzen in anderen Bereichen haben? Sollte die zunehmende sportpolitische Rolle von EU und Kommission überhaupt als Zentralisierungstendenz oder eher als Zeichen einer zunehmenden Verflechtung der von Mitgliedstaaten und Sportverbänden ausgeübten eigenen Rollen gesehen werden? Diese Fragen werden anhand zweier Fallbeispiele untersucht: die Auseinandersetzung der Kommission mit Anti-Doping-Fragen sowie die Gestaltung eines neuen Arbeitsbereichs mithilfe des Konzepts "Health-Enhancing Physical Activity" (HEPA).

The article argues that athletes' right to take decisions from sports governing bodies and specialized sporting bodies to court for judicial review and redress is a cornerstone of the 'Bosnian legacy' which can be said to have been produced by the CJEU (then ECJ) Bosnian ruling. The article makes an empirically grounded assessment of this legacy by drawing on the four contributions made by the EU to the revision of the World Anti-Doping Code (WADC) 2009 (2011–2013) to show how the EU used this opportunity to defend athletes' right to challenge sporting decisions in court, and how the new post-Lisbon sports policy competence granted in Article 165 TFEU (a merely supporting and coordinating competence) has been used in this regard.