Suchergebnisse

Aim: Late Quaternary climate oscillations had major impacts on species distributions and abundances across the northern Holarctic. While many large mammals in this region went extinct towards the end of the Quaternary, some species survived and flourished. Here, we examine population dynamics and range shifts of one of the most widely distributed of these, the moose (Alces alces). Location: Northern Holarctic. Taxon: Moose (A. alces). Methods: We collected samples of modern and ancient moose from across their present and former range. We assessed their phylogeographical relations using part of the mitochondrial DNA in conjunction with radiocarbon dating to investigate the history of A. alces during the last glacial. Results: This species has a relatively shallow history, with the most recent common ancestor estimated at ca. 150–50 kyr. Ancient samples corroborate that its region of greatest diversity is in east Asia, supporting proposals that this is the region of origin of all extant moose. Both eastern and western haplogroups occur in the Ural Mountains during the last glacial period, implying a broader contact zone than previously proposed. It seems that this species went extinct over much of its northern range during the last glacial maximum (LGM) and recolonized the region with climate warming beginning around 15,000 yr bp. The post-LGM expansion included a movement from northeast Siberia to North America via Beringia, although the northeast Siberian source population is not the one currently occupying that area. Main conclusions: Moose are a relatively recently evolved species but have had a dynamic history. As a large-bodied subarctic browsing species, they were seemingly confined to refugia during full-glacial periods and expanded their range northwards when the boreal forest returned after the LGM. The main modern phylogeographical division is ancient, though its boundary has not remained constant. Moose population expansion into America was roughly synchronous with human and red deer expansion. © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Biogeography published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd ; We warmly thank the following museums, curators and people for access to samples: the late Andrei Sher, Severtsov Institute, Moscow; Andy Currant, Natural History Museum, London; Alfred Gardner, Smithsonian, Washington DC; R. Dale Guthrie, University of Alaska, Fairbanks; John de Vos, National Museum of Natural History (Naturalis), Leiden; Eileen Westwig, American Museum of Natural History, NY; Fyodor Shidlovsky, Ice-Age Museum, Moscow; Tong Haowen, Institute of Vertebrate Palaeontology and Paleoanthropology, Beijing; Mammoth Museum, Yakutsk; Geological Museum, Yakutsk; Paleontological Institute, Moscow; Royal Alberta Museum, Edmonton; Zoological Institute, Saint Petersburg; Museum of the Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology, Ekaterinburg. We thank our Yukon First Nation research partners for their continued support for our work on the ice age fossils of Yukon Territory. We are grateful to the placer gold mining community and the Tr'ond?k Hw?ch'in First Nation for their continued support and partnership with our research in the Klondike goldfields region; and the Vuntut Gwitchin First Nation for their collaboration with research in the Old Crow region. We would also like to thank Shai Meiri for help in drawing the map and useful discussion, Tony Stuart for access to radiocarbon dates, and Iris van Pijlen for laboratory assistance. This research was funded by NERC grant NE/G00269X/1 through the European Union FP7 ERA-NET program BiodivERsA. Funding for AMS dating was provided through NERC/AHRC/ORAU Grant NF/2008/2/15.

Mammal bone charms held a special place in the culture of the Finno-Ugrian people of the Perm Cis-Urals. Apart from the drilled hole, these bones were not treated in any way. Analysis of charms unearthed in medieval settlements and burial sites showed that particular parts of the mammal's skeleton were used – mandibles of fur animals (marten, beaver, fox) and teeth, as well as talus bones of beavers and small cattle. Other bones, such as bears' ungual phalanxes, otters' penile bones, martens' and hares' lower extremities and reindeer's prongs, were less common. As for the teeth, they comprise the incisors of large ungulate animals (cattle, horses, moose deer) and the fangs of a wider range of species (martens, foxes, dogs, horses, pigs, and bears). In terms of species, there are parts of skeletons of both domestic animals (big and small cattle, horses, less commonly dogs and pigs) and wild animals (moose deer, bears, martens, foxes, beavers, otters, and hares). The finds from the burial sites showed that bear jaws and fangs, as well as beaver talus bones, were usually worn on belts, while marten and fox fangs were typically part of women's necklaces. Judging by the age and sex of the persons buried with these charms, they were the most vulnerable members of their community – children, old people and women. Charms could not have any connection with any cults or faiths cultivated within a given community, since kinds of charms such as bear fangs and claws, beaver talus bones and teeth of certain animals were widespread, their popularity extremely scattered in terms of time and space. Mammal bone charms were seen as personal helpers and were associated with superstitions rather than faith.

Only five species of the once-diverse Rhinocerotidae remain, making the reconstruction of their evolutionary history a challenge to biologists since Darwin. We sequenced genomes from five rhinoceros species (three extinct and two living), which we compared to existing data from the remaining three living species and a range of outgroups. We identify an early divergence between extant African and Eurasian lineages, resolving a key debate regarding the phylogeny of extant rhinoceroses. This early Miocene (∼16 million years ago [mya]) split post-dates the land bridge formation between the Afro-Arabian and Eurasian landmasses. Our analyses also show that while rhinoceros genomes in general exhibit low levels of genome-wide diversity, heterozygosity is lowest and inbreeding is highest in the modern species. These results suggest that while low genetic diversity is a long-term feature of the family, it has been particularly exacerbated recently, likely reflecting recent anthropogenic-driven population declines. © 2021 The Authors. ; The authors acknowledge support from the Science for Life Laboratory, the Garvan Institute of Medical Research, the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation, and the National Genomics Infrastructure funded by the Swedish Research Council and Uppsala Multidisciplinary Center for Advanced Computational Science for assistance with massively parallel sequencing and access to the UPPMAX computational infrastructure. We thank the Natural History Museum at the University of Oslo for providing the Javan rhinoceros sample. We thank the Museum of the Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology (UB RAS, Ekaterinburg) for providing the sample of Siberian unicorn. M.T.P.G. was supported by European Research Council (ERC) Consolidator grant 681396 (Extinction Genomics). E.D.L. was supported by Independent Research Fund Denmark grant 8021-00218B . A.C. was supported by an Australian Research Council Laureate Fellowship ( FL140100260 ). T.M.B. is supported by funding from the ERC under the European Union's Horizon ...