Suchergebnisse

Tekst analizuje przemiany polityki spójności i skutki, jakie to pociąga za sobą dla polskich regionów. Zakłada, że Unia Europejska ani polityka spójności nie przestaną istnieć. Główna teza mówi, iż od 2010 trwają nieskuteczne próby przejścia od starego do nowego paradygmatu w polityce spójności, wprowadzenia bardziej horyzontalnego podejścia, obwarowań dostępu do środków, zasady partnerstwa i wielopoziomowego rządzenia (zarządzania) (eng. multilevel governance). Dopiero okres 2014–2020 zapowiada istotne zmiany, które jednak mogą napotkać przeszkody w dużym stopniu płynące z ograniczeń wiedzy o gospodarce i rozwoju oraz wyuczonych doświadczeń poakcesyjnych. W efekcie mamy do czynienia raczej z umiejętnością wydawania pieniędzy europejskich, niż osiąganiem dzięki nim celów rozwoju. Metoda bazuje głównie na studiach literaturowych i dokumentach krajowych i unijnych. Artykuł analizuje kierunki, charakter i przyczyny zmian, skutki dla Polski i jej regionów oraz formułuje wnioski i zagrożenia.

Marek W. Kozak University of Warsaw m.kozak@uw.edu.pl Impact of Cohesion policy on Poland Poland has relatively short experience in European policies implementation. Its ability to analyze the effects and modify strategies and implementation following experience-based rule is of particular importance for development pace and path. There is a number of ways of evaluating impacts of public intervention. In case of Cohesion policy and their key instruments (that is structural funds and Cohesion fund), it is important to notice, that in 2007 two structural funds (EAGGF and FIOR) ceased to exist. However, they still do contribute to the impact on Polish economy development, as many other external and internal factors (globalization, global terms of trade, institutional change, mix of national and European policies etc). Up to now richness and interlinkages between factors makes it more than difficult to identify and measure real net impact of specific funds, as their goals and management are - at least in theory - closely coordiated and are being implemented pretty long after formal date of end of financial perspective (due to N+2 and N+3 rules). Even in case of econometric models in use (HERMIN, QUEST and other) problem of net influence measurement exists as they are based mostly on previous performance and a number of assumptions relating to development factors. The aim of this text is to discuss available information (ex-post evaluation, progress reports, scientific publications and other sources) on the Polish case, and, more importantly, to assess whether the impact of Cohesion policy up to now is better visible on the demand or supply side. Main thesis is that the effects of Cohesion policy are mostly restricted to demand side, that is up to now it brings short-and medium-term results rather than impacts (understood as structural change).

The aim of the report is to review the available data of cohesion policy implementation and performance and to conduct analysis on spatial differentiation patterns at the regional level. The report consists of two parts. The first part reviews existing data sources and assesses the spatial and thematic coverage and quality of the data. The second part is focused on analysis and mapping of cohesion policy implementation and performance in terms of: the scale and structure of cohesion policy allocations and spending by regions; the implementation and delivery systems; implementation effectiveness; and policy effectiveness. ; COHESIFY Research paper 7. COHESIFY WP3 -- Task 3.1: Output 3.1