Antiretroviral therapy has transformed the management of HIV-infected individuals over the past quarter century. However, important challenges remain. These include attempts to eradicate HIV from reservoirs within the body, thereby eliminating the need for lifetime therapy. In addition, improvements in drug development, clinical trial, and regulatory pathways are necessary to expeditiously evaluate novel therapeutic regimens and strategies. Antiretroviral drug scarcity remains a major problem in underserved populations worldwide, and partnerships among pharmaceutical companies, academic investigators, and both governmental and nongovernmental agencies are necessary to improve access to these lifesaving regimens.
AbstractIntroductionHIV rebounds after cessation of antiretroviral therapy, representing a barrier to cure. To better understand the virus reservoir, analysis pipelines have been developed that categorize proviral sequences as intact or defective, and further determine the precise nature of the sequence defects that may be present. We investigated the effects that different analysis pipelines had on the characterization of HIV‐1 proviral sequences.MethodsWe used single genome amplification to generate near full‐length (NFL) HIV‐1 proviral DNA sequences, defined as amplicons greater than 8000 base pairs in length, isolated from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) of treated suppressed participants with HIV‐1. Amplicons underwent direct next‐generation single genome sequencing and were analysed using four HIV‐1 proviral characterization pipelines. Sequences were characterized as intact or defective; defective sequences were assessed for the number and types of defects present. To confirm and extend our findings, 691 proviruses from the Proviral Sequence Database (PSD) were analysed and the ProSeq‐IT tool of the PSD was used to characterize both the participant and PSD proviruses.Results and discussionVirus sequences derived from thirteen ART‐treated virologically suppressed participants with HIV were studied. A total of 693 HIV‐1 proviral sequences were generated, 282 of which were NFL. An average of 53 sequences per participant was analysed. We found that proviruses often harbour multiple sequence defect types (mean 2.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.5, 3.0); the elimination order used by each pipeline affected the percentage of proviruses allotted into each defect category. These differences varied between participants, depending on the number of defect categories present in a given provirus sequence. Pipeline‐specific differences in characterizing the HIV‐1 5′ untranslated region (5′ UTR) led to an overestimation of the number of intact NFL proviral sequences, a finding corroborated in the independent PSD analysis. A comparison of the four published pipelines to ProSeq‐IT found that ProSeq IT was more likely to characterize proviruses as intact.ConclusionsThe choice of pipeline used for HIV‐1 provirus landscape analysis may bias the classification of defective sequences. To improve the comparison of provirus characterizations across research groups, the development of a consensus elimination pipeline should be prioritized.
AbstractIntroductionMost African countries perform infant HIV testing at 6 weeks or later. The addition of targeted testing at birth may improve retention in care, treatment outcomes and survival for HIV‐infected infants.Methods HIV‐exposed infants were screened as part of the Early Infant Treatment (EIT) study in Botswana. Screened infants were ≥35 weeks gestational age and ≥2000 g at birth. Risk factors for mother‐to‐child transmission (MTCT) were assessed by maternal obstetric card or verbally. Risk factors included <8 weeks ART in pregnancy, last known CD4 <250 cells/mm3, last known HIV RNA >400 copies/mL, poor maternal ART adherence, lack of maternal zidovudine (ZDV) in labour, or lack of infant post‐exposure prophylaxis. Infants underwent dried blood spot testing by Roche Cobas Ampliprep/Cobas Taqman HIV‐1 qualitative PCR.ResultsFrom April 2015 to April 2016, 2303 HIV‐exposed infants were tested for HIV in the EIT study. Of these, 369 (16%) were identified as high risk for HIV infection by information available at birth, and 12 (0.5% overall, 3.25% of high risk) were identified as HIV positive at birth. All 12 positive infants were identified as high risk at the time of screening, and only 2 risk factors were required to identify all positive infants: either <8 weeks of maternal ART in pregnancy (75%) or lack of maternal HIV suppression at last test (25%).Conclusions In utero MTCT occurred only among infants identified as high risk at delivery, using information available from the mother or obstetric record. Birth testing that targets high‐risk infants based on maternal ART receipt is likely to identify the majority of in utero HIV transmissions, and allows early ART initiation for these infants.
AbstractIntroductionTenofovir diphosphate (TFV‐DP) in dried blood spots (DBS), a measure of cumulative antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence, is associated with viral suppression and predicts future viremia in persons with HIV (PWH). However, its utility to identify those at risk for virologic failure (VF) and drug resistance is unknown. To address this, we aimed to establish the association between this adherence biomarker and VF with drug resistance in a cohort of PWH initiating first‐line ART in KwaZulu‐Natal, South Africa.MethodsPWH initiating TFV disoproxil fumarate (TDF)‐based ART within a parent prospective cohort were evaluated. Using a nested design, DBS for TFV‐DP were collected from cases who developed VF (HIV‐1 RNA ≥1000 copies/ml) after ≥5 months on ART versus controls, matched 1:2 by site, age, gender, race and ART duration. Cases were categorized as having VF with or without resistance using genotyping. One‐way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare TFV‐DP for controls, cases with VF and resistance, and cases with VF without resistance. Data are presented as mean (standard deviation, SD) or geometric mean [95% confidence interval, 95% CI].Results and discussionOne thousand participants were enrolled in the parent study between 2014 and 2016, of which 288 (29%) had DBS available. Of these, 94 (33%) were cases and 194 (67%) were controls; 59% were women. Mean age of our population was 33 (SD 8) years. Genotyping was available in 50 (53%) of the 94 cases. Geometric mean TFV‐DP in DBS from controls was 708 [95% CI; 647–773] fmol/punch, which was higher compared to participants having VF with resistance (n = 36), 386 [95% CI; 241–617] fmol/punch and VF without resistance (n = 14), 61 [95% CI; 22–164] fmol/punch; p<0.001. Genotype could not be obtained in 44 (47%) cases.ConclusionsTFV‐DP in DBS showed a stepwise association with VF and drug resistance in South African PWH. Participants having VF with resistance had mid‐range concentrations of TFV‐DP, which were higher than those for PWH without resistance. Future research on the clinical utility of TFV‐DP concentrations in DBS to predict and prevent the development of VF and drug resistance is needed.
With the advent and stunning success of combination antiretroviral therapy (ART) to prolong and improve quality of life for persons with HIV infection, HIV research has been afforded the opportunity to pivot towards studies aimed at finding "a cure." The mere idea that cure of HIV might be possible has energized researchers and the community towards achieving this goal. Funding agencies, both governmental and private, have targeted HIV cure as a high priority; many in the field have responded to these initiatives and the cure research agenda is robust. In this "salon" two editors of Pathogens and Immunity, Michael Lederman and Daniel Douek ask whether curing HIV is a realistic, scalable objective. We start with an overview perspective and have asked a number of prominent HIV researchers to add to the discussion.
With the advent and stunning success of combination antiretroviral therapy (ART) to prolong and improve quality of life for persons with HIV infection, HIV research has been afforded the opportunity to pivot towards studies aimed at finding "a cure." The mere idea that cure of HIV might be possible has energized researchers and the community towards achieving this goal. Funding agencies, both governmental and private, have targeted HIV cure as a high priority; many in the field have responded to these initiatives and the cure research agenda is robust. In this "salon" two editors of Pathogens and Immunity, Michael Lederman and Daniel Douek ask whether curing HIV is a realistic, scalable objective. We start with an overview perspective and have asked a number of prominent HIV researchers to add to the discussion.
With the advent and stunning success of combination antiretroviral therapy (ART) to prolong and improve quality of life for persons with HIV infection, HIV research has been afforded the opportunity to pivot towards studies aimed at finding "a cure." The mere idea that cure of HIV might be possible has energized researchers and the community towards achieving this goal. Funding agencies, both governmental and private, have targeted HIV cure as a high priority; many in the field have responded to these initiatives and the cure research agenda is robust.
On September 10, 2021, a special tribunal established by the French government launched an inquiry into the activities of former health minister Dr. Agnes Buzyn who was charged with "endangering the lives of others". It is surprising to learn of this accusation and inquiry into the actions of a public health official whose response to the epidemic was, to all appearances, exemplary.
