Suchergebnisse

Cover -- Title Page -- Foreword -- Contents -- Table of Abbreviations -- Table of Cases -- Table of Legislation -- Table of Treaties and Conventions -- 1. Introduction -- I. The Subject Matter of Private International Law -- II. Sources of Private International Law -- III. History of Private International Law in Indonesia -- A. Before Independence -- B. After Independence -- IV. Preliminary Matters -- A. Characterisation -- B. Incidental Question -- C. Dépeçage -- D. Renvoi and Transmission -- V. Connecting Factors -- A. Nationality -- B. Domicile -- C. Residence -- VI. Substance and Procedure -- A. Procedure -- B. Substance -- VII. Proof of Foreign Law and Other Evidentiary Matters -- A. Proving Foreign Law -- B. Taking Evidence in Indonesia for Use in Foreign Proceedings -- C. Taking Evidence Abroad for Use in Indonesian Proceedings -- VIII. Mandatory Rules, Ordre Public, Public Law, and the Evasion of Law -- A. Ordre Public and Public Law -- B. Mandatory Rules -- C. Evasion of Law -- 2. Jurisdiction -- I. Jurisdiction in Personam -- A. General Principles -- B. Special Rules -- II. Jurisdiction in Shipping Claims -- A. Jurisdiction of the Indonesian Court -- B. The Process of Ship Arrest in Indonesia -- III. Immunities from Jurisdiction -- A. Sovereign Immunity -- B. State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) -- 3. Choice of Law -- I. Law of Obligations -- A. Contracts -- B. Specific Contracts -- C. Torts -- D. Unjust Enrichment -- E. Trusts and Charitable Foundations -- II. Law of Property -- A. Immovable Property -- B. Transfer of Movable Property -- C. Expropriation -- D. Succession to Property -- III. Intellectual Property -- IV. Family Law -- A. Marriage -- B. Matrimonial Causes -- C. Children -- D. Mental Incapacity -- V. Law of Corporations and Insolvency and Law of Bankruptcy -- A. Capacity, Agency and Internal Management.

The burden of proof is always on the plaintiffs in consumer goods loss actions, if the law is followed. Consumers bear a significant burden of evidence due to their lack of knowledge about the production process, the technology used, and the materials really utilized by producers in their roles as business actors. As mentioned in its explanation, the burden of proof is reversed in Consumer Protection Act by adopting a reverse burden of proof system. Hence, this study intends to examine ratio of legislation and principles in Consumer Protection Act and the use of the principle of absolute responsibility as an equalization of the position of consumers with business actors in the Consumer Protection Act. This study takes a legislative approach to normative research. The findings indicate that there are differences of opinion regarding the application of the burden of proof reversal system in the UUPK, owing to the fact that consumer protection is still considered to be inadequate, particularly in claims for compensation for defective products and products containing materials known to be hazardous to physical and mental health. Consumers are not compensated if the business actor establishes that the loss was the result of consumer mistake.

The final and binding nature of international arbitral awards results in the nullification of the rights of the parties to file legal remedies against the arbitral award, as is the case with decisions of national courts that can be appealed, appealed, or reviewed. However, Article 68 paragraph (2) of Law Number 30 of 1999 concerning arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution provides an opportunity for parties who refuse to recognize and implement an international arbitral award that can be appealed to, as well as Article 70 must also be explained that Article this applies only to national arbitrations. This of course creates legal uncertainty, disuse, and injustice for the parties. Therefore, what is highlighted in this research is what is the position of the final and binding international arbitration award in Indonesia. The research method used in this article is legal research using primary and secondary legal materials. The results of the research show that the position of international arbitral awards in Indonesia is not the same as the decisions of national courts because they cannot be appealed, cassated, and reviewed. Therefore, it is necessary to completely amend international arbitration arrangements by removing Article 68 paragraph (2) of Law Number 30 of 1999 concerning Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution in order to provide legal certainty, benefit, and justice for the parties.

The purpose of this article is to discuss the authority of the notary in making a certificate of inheritance and legal force for the certificate of inheritance for Indonesian citizens after the enactment of Law Number 24 of 2013 concerning Population Administration. The study uses a normative juridical method with a legislative approach and analytical approach. The legislative approach is used to analyze problems caused by inconsistencies in norms of the relevant laws and regulations in making a certificate of inheritance. The analytical approach is used to analyze the meaning contained in the terms used in legislation regarding the drafting of a certificate of inherit- ance conceptually. Notaries have strong authority in making certificate of inheritance for Indonesian citizens without discriminating between population groups. The certificate of inheritance made by a Notary has perfect legal force.