Suchergebnisse
Filter
28 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
SSRN
Working paper
Understanding Dialogue in Ukraine: A Survey-Based Study, Analytical Report 2018
In: Mediation and Dialogue Research Center, Kyiv, 2018
SSRN
Working paper
Professional Peacemakers in Ukraine: Mediators and Dialogue Facilitators Before and After 2014
In: 3 Kyiv-Mohyla Law and Politics Journal 2017
SSRN
Working paper
РОЗУМІЮЧИ ДІАЛОГ: АНАЛІТИЧНИЙ ЗВІТ ЗА РЕЗУЛЬТАТАМИ ОПИТУВАННЯ УЧАСНИКІВ ДІАЛОГІВ В УКРАЇНІ (Understanding Dialogue in Ukraine: A Survey-Based Study)
In: Тетяна Кисельова, Розуміючи діалог: Аналітичний звіт за результатами опитування учасників діалогів в Україні (Understanding Dialogue: A Survey-based Study), Центр досліджень медіації та діалогу, НаУКМА, Київ, 2018
SSRN
Working paper
Механізми Саморегулювання Діяльності Медіаторів: Кращі Практики І Уроки Для України (Self-Regulation of Mediation: Best Practices and Lessons for Ukraine)
In: USAID 'New Justice' Program Report 2018
SSRN
Working paper
Professional Peacemakers in Ukraine: Mediators and Dialogue Facilitators Before and After 2014
In: Kyiv-Mohyla law and politics journal, Band 0, Heft 3, S. 117-136
ISSN: 2414-9942
Integration of Mediation into Ukrainian Court System: Policy Paper
In: Council of Europe, Kyiv, 2017
SSRN
Working paper
Professional Peacemakers in Ukraine: Mediators and Dialogue Facilitators Before and After 2014
Based on the findings of qualitative empirical study, this article reveals that, in contrast to most violent conflicts in the world, the Ukrainian context is distinguished by the presence of a self-organized, self-aware and skilled local professional communities of mediators and dialogue facilitators. The article analyses each professional community and concludes that Ukrainian mediators and dialogue facilitators are capable to serve as independent actors in peacebuilding process, guiding their international colleagues and the government as for the best practices of mediation and dialogue. At the same time, both communities still experience pains of professional growth such as making choices between core methods and societal roles and they need external support. Additionally, the 2014 crisis has brought some opportunities concerning increased funding for mediation and dialogue, and the top-down pressure of the international community for greater use of these tools. These opportunities have, in turn, triggered some challenges such as an increased competition for funding and ideological tensions between "the peacemakers" and the other groups of Ukrainian civil society inspired by the military discourse.
BASE
Mediation in Ukraine: Challenges of Peace and War
In: Tulane Journal of International & Comparative Law, Band 26, Heft 1
SSRN
Working paper
Professional Peacemakers in Ukraine: Mediators and Dialogue Facilitators Before and After 2014
In: 3 Kyiv-Mohyla Law and Politics Journal 2017
SSRN
Professional Peacemakers in Ukraine: Mediators and Dialogue Facilitators Before and After 2014
Based on the findings of qualitative empirical study, this article reveals that, in contrast to most violent conflicts in the world, the Ukrainian context is distinguished by the presence of a self-organized, self-aware and skilled local professional communities of mediators and dialogue facilitators. The article analyses each professional community and concludes that Ukrainian mediators and dialogue facilitators are capable to serve as independent actors in peacebuilding process, guiding their international colleagues and the government as for the best practices of mediation and dialogue. At the same time, both communities still experience pains of professional growth such as making choices between core methods and societal roles and they need external support. Additionally, the 2014 crisis has brought some opportunities concerning increased funding for mediation and dialogue, and the top-down pressure of the international community for greater use of these tools. These opportunities have, in turn, triggered some challenges such as an increased competition for funding and ideological tensions between "the peacemakers" and the other groups of Ukrainian civil society inspired by the military discourse.
BASE
Professional Peacemakers in Ukraine: Mediators and Dialogue Facilitators Before and After 2014
Based on the findings of qualitative empirical study, this article reveals that, in contrast to most violent conflicts in the world, the Ukrainian context is distinguished by the presence of a self-organized, self-aware and skilled local professional communities of mediators and dialogue facilitators. The article analyses each professional community and concludes that Ukrainian mediators and dialogue facilitators are capable to serve as independent actors in peacebuilding process, guiding their international colleagues and the government as for the best practices of mediation and dialogue. At the same time, both communities still experience pains of professional growth such as making choices between core methods and societal roles and they need external support. Additionally, the 2014 crisis has brought some opportunities concerning increased funding for mediation and dialogue, and the top-down pressure of the international community for greater use of these tools. These opportunities have, in turn, triggered some challenges such as an increased competition for funding and ideological tensions between "the peacemakers" and the other groups of Ukrainian civil society inspired by the military discourse.
BASE
Mediation Development in Ukraine: 1991-2016
SSRN
Working paper
The Role of State in Ukrainian Business: Violent Bespredel and Profitable Partner
In: Kyiv-Mohyla law and politics journal, Band 0, Heft 1, S. 83-112
ISSN: 2414-9942
The Role of State in Ukrainian Business: Violent Bespredel and Profitable Partner
In: 1 Kyiv-Mohyla Law and Politics Journal 83 (2015)
SSRN