Suchergebnisse

The purpose of the article is to study Ukrainian culture of the middle of XVII — the end of XVIII centuries as a "window of opportunities" for full-fledged modernization, especially within the territorial and chronological boundaries of the newly emerged Ukrainian statehood — the Hetmanate.
The metodology. In the article we used the theory of classic modernization as the transition of a certain society from the traditional, agrarian stage of development to industrial one due to complex, profound changes in all spheres of public life and culture. Based on the structural-systemic approach the main manifestations of opportunities for classical modernization in the Ukrainian lands at the beginning of the period were identifed, and then based on the historical method the most important results of their evolution at the end of XVIII century were considered. By the method of comparative analysis, these results were compared with the achievements of European societies.
The results. It was concluded that the scale and duration of the innovations at the end of the XVIII century were insufficient to make a real modernization of the Ukrainian culture and to establish the foundations of a new industrial society, compared to the center or the semi-periphery of the Western economic world system. Regressive tendencies in all spheres without exception mutually blocked the "window of opportunities".
The scientific novelty of this article is a contribution to the innovative vision of the historical development of Ukrainian culture as a number of opportunities for successful modernization lost in different periods.
The practical significance. It was shown, that the failures of modernization processes for Ukrainian culture are equal to the failures of national liberation struggles.

Розглянуто основні напрями та проміжні результати впровадження електронного урядування в Україні у 2014–2017 рр. Показано, що реформування електронного урядування має ознаки комплексності, хоча інтегрованої системи такого урядування не створено. Його розвиток можна розглядати в ширшому контексті — як один із драйверів модернізації України, фактор соціокультурної динаміки, що розширює постмодерністський сегмент української культури. Проте поступ електронного урядування базується на вузькій соціально-економічній основі, не може замінити реальних політичних реформ. Отже, e-gov є новітнім, але не самодостатнім фактором модернізації. ; The aim of the paper is to determine the value of the development of e-governance in Ukraine in 2014–2017 as a factor in socio-cultural dynamics.Research methodology. The study investigates this issue by examining various practices of e-governance in Ukraine and its influences on the public sectors.Results. The principal directions and intermediate results of the implementation of e-governance in Ukraine in 2014–2017 are considered. It has been shown that the reform of e-governance bears the marks of complexity, although an integrated system of such governance has not been created. The greatest success in the Ukrainian e-governance has been achieved in the area of e-participation. The major challenge is a low interactivity of Ukrainian e-services.The development of the Ukrainian e-governance can be considered in the broader context — as one of the drivers of modernization of Ukraine, a factor of socio-cultural dynamics, which extends the postmodernist segment of Ukrainian culture. However, the progress of e-governance takes place on a narrow socio-economic basis; it cannot substitute the real political reforms. The development of the e-governance is not a self-sufficient factor of the modernization.Novelty. The author substantiates the hypothesis on the media as one of the most important nonclassic «drivers» of the secondary modernization not only in the political-economic, but also in the cultural sector.The practical significance. The information contained in this article may be useful for teaching the various media courses, the media studies and the theory of modernization.