The administration of the Negeri government in Salahutu Sub-district of Maluku District was in the middle of a government vacuum, so the provision of positions carried out in practice appointed the acting head of the Negeri government who was not a civil servant from the district / city environment. This issue is clearly in conflict with applicable laws and regulations. So this research aims to analyze the appointment of the acting head of the Negeri government that is not of civil servants and how the legal consequences. The concept of appointing an official to fill the government vacancy in the village or what is called by another name, is to carry out government functions related to public services and development, so that the civil servants are competent.
This paper uses a normative legal research method because the focus of the study departs from the vagueness of norms, using the approaches: statute approach, conceptual approach, and analytical approach, and the results of this paper regulate that village consultations are the authority of the Village Consultative Body, or what is called the Negeri Suli Government. namely Saniri authority. The Village Deliberation is a deliberation related to strategic matters so that it cannot be ruled out, the fact that has occurred over a period of 7 years since the Village Fund was disbursed, the Negeri Suli Government has neglected the stages of the Village Deliberation, and this has greatly impacted the sub-optimal development process. in the Suli country. Village deliberations aim to maximize the aspirations of the community which will be implemented through targeted government work programs
The Indonesian government has gone through government regimes ranging from the Old Order to the Reformation Order to date which also has an impact on statutory provisions including land policies which are constantly changing and causing overlapping of various regulations as one of the triggers for land conflicts. In order to overcome the overlapping issue of land regulations, a new breakthrough was born through the concept of the Omnibus Law from the government as a strategy and solution for structuring land regulations. Through the Omnibus Law concept, it is hoped that it can resolve land conflicts due to overlapping regulations quickly, precisely and efficiently, and can organize and harmonize various land regulations from the central to regional levels. With the effective and efficient arrangement of land regulations, it will support the improvement of the investment climate in Indonesia.
Introduction: The non-compliance of the state administrative body or official with the TUN Court decision can be in the form of not revoking the disputed State Administrative decision, not revoking the TUN decision, not issuing a TUN decision, not complying with the obligation to pay compensation set by the court and not complying to rehabilitate the good name plaintiff.Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this study is to examine and analyze the payment of forced money and administrative sanctions against state administration officials who do not comply with the state administration's decisions and legal actions due to non-compliance of state administration officials to the application of forced money (dwangson) in the execution of state administration decisions.Methods of the Research: The writing method used is sociological juridical research. The location of this research is the Ambon State Administrative Court, the Ambon City Government Legal Division, the Maluku Province Law and Human Rights Bureau and the Central Maluku District Government Law Department.Results of the Research: The results of the study indicate that the disobedience of State Administrative Officials in implementing decisions that already have permanent legal force because there are no regulations and or legal provisions regarding forced payment of money to be implemented if the State Administrative Officials do not implement decisions that already have permanent legal force, and there is no special agency or executive body
This research was conducted to review and analyze the technical aspects of the law, especially in the approach of constitutional law and administrative law related to governance and accountability and responsibility in managing village funds and how efforts are made in the framework of prevention, especially the supervision aspect of minimizing the existence of village funds. Misuse and corruption in the use of village funds by village officials. This study uses a socio-legal method (doctrinal analysis of the law) using 3 (three) approaches, namely first, the conditional approach, which refers to the village fund management policy strategy, mainly related to the high cases of corruption in village funds; (2) statute approach, which refers to the system to legislation relating to the management of village funds; and (3) legal policy, which relates to government policies in terms of monitoring and preventing corruption in the direction of village funds. All stages in this research are carried out using a community service research scheme that has been determined by the research institution to be carried out by the Research Team in the field of constitutional law studies and administrative law. The focus of the research will be directed at structuring the relationship of authority between law enforcement agencies and the government, in this case, the Government Internal Supervisory Apparatus (APIP), in conducting supervision and law enforcement on the management of village funds. This is intended to obtain a model and policy framework for managing village funds free from criminal acts of corruption to realize the principles of transparency and accountability by the applicable laws and regulations.
