Suchergebnisse

International audience ; ABSTRACT. Education for sustainable development is part of the mainstream of global education. It is probably the most visibly political. It is indicative of the tensions that also exist in other education for. Consequently, its acceptance as a curriculum and its implementation cannot be carried out without its legitimation by a referential metanarrative. To what kind of metanarrative do the actors and stakeholders of this education refer? How do we think about these questions from a curricular point of view and from a didactic point of view? It is these questions that this article proposes to take charge of, not for the purpose of completion or completeness, but for the purpose of initiating new research perspectives. ; Parmi l'ensemble des éducations à, celle au développement durable est probablement la plus explicitement et visiblement politique. En cela elle est révélatrice des tensions existant également dans les autres éducations à. De ce fait, son acceptation comme curriculum et sa mise en œuvre ne peuvent s'effectuer sans sa légitimation par un méta-récit référent. Pour autant, de quel(s)méta récit(s) le développement durable est-il porteur ? A quel méta-récit se réfèrent les acteurs et parties prenantes de cette éducation ? Comment penser ces questions d'un point de vue curriculaire et d'un point de vue didactique ? Ce sont ces questions que cet article se propose de prendre en charge, dans un but, non de clôture ou d'exhaustivité, mais dans celui d'initier de nouvelles perspectives de recherche.

International audience ; ABSTRACT. Education for sustainable development is part of the mainstream of global education. It is probably the most visibly political. It is indicative of the tensions that also exist in other education for. Consequently, its acceptance as a curriculum and its implementation cannot be carried out without its legitimation by a referential metanarrative. To what kind of metanarrative do the actors and stakeholders of this education refer? How do we think about these questions from a curricular point of view and from a didactic point of view? It is these questions that this article proposes to take charge of, not for the purpose of completion or completeness, but for the purpose of initiating new research perspectives. ; Parmi l'ensemble des éducations à, celle au développement durable est probablement la plus explicitement et visiblement politique. En cela elle est révélatrice des tensions existant également dans les autres éducations à. De ce fait, son acceptation comme curriculum et sa mise en œuvre ne peuvent s'effectuer sans sa légitimation par un méta-récit référent. Pour autant, de quel(s)méta récit(s) le développement durable est-il porteur ? A quel méta-récit se réfèrent les acteurs et parties prenantes de cette éducation ? Comment penser ces questions d'un point de vue curriculaire et d'un point de vue didactique ? Ce sont ces questions que cet article se propose de prendre en charge, dans un but, non de clôture ou d'exhaustivité, mais dans celui d'initier de nouvelles perspectives de recherche.

International audience ; ABSTRACT. Education for sustainable development is part of the mainstream of global education. It is probably the most visibly political. It is indicative of the tensions that also exist in other education for. Consequently, its acceptance as a curriculum and its implementation cannot be carried out without its legitimation by a referential metanarrative. To what kind of metanarrative do the actors and stakeholders of this education refer? How do we think about these questions from a curricular point of view and from a didactic point of view? It is these questions that this article proposes to take charge of, not for the purpose of completion or completeness, but for the purpose of initiating new research perspectives. ; Parmi l'ensemble des éducations à, celle au développement durable est probablement la plus explicitement et visiblement politique. En cela elle est révélatrice des tensions existant également dans les autres éducations à. De ce fait, son acceptation comme curriculum et sa mise en œuvre ne peuvent s'effectuer sans sa légitimation par un méta-récit référent. Pour autant, de quel(s)méta récit(s) le développement durable est-il porteur ? A quel méta-récit se réfèrent les acteurs et parties prenantes de cette éducation ? Comment penser ces questions d'un point de vue curriculaire et d'un point de vue didactique ? Ce sont ces questions que cet article se propose de prendre en charge, dans un but, non de clôture ou d'exhaustivité, mais dans celui d'initier de nouvelles perspectives de recherche.

International audience ; ABSTRACT. Education for sustainable development is part of the mainstream of global education. It is probably the most visibly political. It is indicative of the tensions that also exist in other education for. Consequently, its acceptance as a curriculum and its implementation cannot be carried out without its legitimation by a referential metanarrative. To what kind of metanarrative do the actors and stakeholders of this education refer? How do we think about these questions from a curricular point of view and from a didactic point of view? It is these questions that this article proposes to take charge of, not for the purpose of completion or completeness, but for the purpose of initiating new research perspectives. ; Parmi l'ensemble des éducations à, celle au développement durable est probablement la plus explicitement et visiblement politique. En cela elle est révélatrice des tensions existant également dans les autres éducations à. De ce fait, son acceptation comme curriculum et sa mise en œuvre ne peuvent s'effectuer sans sa légitimation par un méta-récit référent. Pour autant, de quel(s)méta récit(s) le développement durable est-il porteur ? A quel méta-récit se réfèrent les acteurs et parties prenantes de cette éducation ? Comment penser ces questions d'un point de vue curriculaire et d'un point de vue didactique ? Ce sont ces questions que cet article se propose de prendre en charge, dans un but, non de clôture ou d'exhaustivité, mais dans celui d'initier de nouvelles perspectives de recherche.

International audience ; To crises of civilization, culture, democracy, and though-out economic, employment . that beset contemporary societies, the school is ordered to answer and at the same time accused - here following the events of January 2015 as "elsewhere", for example in Algeria following the "black years" - to be the cause. While the finding of a crisis in education resulting from these arrests feeds the media debate (doubt of educators and teachers on their missions, international surveys that question the quality of public service .) and that the proposals for change (Unesco , 2015; Blais, Left, Ottavi, 2014; Pourtois and Desmet, 1997 .), Metamorphosis (Morin, 2014), or processing / overhaul (re-founding of the School Act, 2013 .) are multiplying, it seems appropriate to clarify the phenomenon of educations citizenship, sustainable development (ESD), information and media, health . - commonly described as "educations for" in the francophone sphere - in their transformative capacity of the education system existing, they would offer opportunities or ideological excesses they would carry. At the very least, they reposition to center stage the issue of education and its role and goals within societies. ; Aux crises de civilisation, de culture, de démocratie, et, bien-sur, économique, d'emplois … qui assaillent les sociétés contemporaines, l'Ecole est sommée de répondre et dans le même temps accusée - ici suite aux évènements de janvier 2015, comme « ailleurs », par exemple en Algérie suite aux « années noires » - d'en être la cause. Alors que le constat d'une crise de l'éducation qui résulte de ces interpellations alimente les débats médiatiques (doute des éducateurs et enseignants sur leurs missions, enquêtes internationales qui questionnent la qualité du service public…) et que les propositions de changement (Unesco, 2015 ; Blais, Gaucher, Ottavi, 2014 ; Pourtois et Desmet, 1997 …), de métamorphose (Morin, 2014), ou de transformation/refondation (loi de refondation de l'Ecole, 2013 …) se multiplient, ...

Organisation : laboratoire CIVIIC, en lien avec le GRHIS et l'ESPE de l'Académie de Rouen, et en partenariat avec le RéUniFEDD. ; International audience ; To crises of civilization, culture, democracy, and though-out economic, employment . that beset contemporary societies, the school is ordered to answer and at the same time accused - here following the events of January 2015 as "elsewhere", for example in Algeria following the "black years" - to be the cause. While the finding of a crisis in education resulting from these arrests feeds the media debate (doubt of educators and teachers on their missions, international surveys that question the quality of public service .) and that the proposals for change (Unesco , 2015; Blais, Left, Ottavi, 2014; Pourtois and Desmet, 1997 .), Metamorphosis (Morin, 2014), or processing / overhaul (re-founding of the School Act, 2013 .) are multiplying, it seems appropriate to clarify the phenomenon of educations citizenship, sustainable development (ESD), information and media, health . - commonly described as "educations for" in the francophone sphere - in their transformative capacity of the education system existing, they would offer opportunities or ideological excesses they would carry. At the very least, they reposition to center stage the issue of education and its role and goals within societies. ; Aux crises de civilisation, de culture, de démocratie, et, bien-sur, économique, d'emplois … qui assaillent les sociétés contemporaines, l'Ecole est sommée de répondre et dans le même temps accusée - ici suite aux évènements de janvier 2015, comme « ailleurs », par exemple en Algérie suite aux « années noires » - d'en être la cause. Alors que le constat d'une crise de l'éducation qui résulte de ces interpellations alimente les débats médiatiques (doute des éducateurs et enseignants sur leurs missions, enquêtes internationales qui questionnent la qualité du service public…) et que les propositions de changement (Unesco, 2015 ; Blais, Gaucher, Ottavi, 2014 ; Pourtois et Desmet, 1997 …), de métamorphose (Morin, 2014), ou de transformation/refondation (loi de refondation de l'Ecole, 2013 …) se multiplient, il semble opportun de clarifier le phénomène des éducations à la citoyenneté, au développement durable (EDD), à l'information et aux médias, à la santé … - communément qualifiées d' « éducations à » dans la sphère francophone – vis-à-vis de leurs capacités transformatrices du système éducatif existant, des opportunités qu'elles offriraient ou des dérives idéologiques dont elles seraient porteuses. A tout le moins, elles replacent au devant de la scène la question de l'Education et de ses rôles et finalités au sein des sociétés.

International audience ; Education for human development within the constraints of sustainability is problematic for schools. On one hand, it is a political idea that continues to evolve with successive compromises between social groups with differing or even conflicting interests. ESD is therefore inherently 'non-disciplinary' and cannot be the basis of a single school subject if we wish to keep the creativity that results from the dynamics at work. On the other hand, SD leads us to think collectively about solutions that ensure a future of our choosing that preserves the biological capacity of the planet and to reduce our vulnerability. The sciences thus have a key role: their ability to question the world and to model the consequences of collective and individual choices. But there is a risk of technocratic drift and SD leads us to think about society's values and aims. A new link is established between sciences and humanities with a democratic model in sight. This paper presents what is possible out of the prospective scenarios method within general and compulsory education by seeking, through an empirical approach, to determine its feasibility, its contributions, its limits, and to locate the place of science education in the elaboration of the perception of " vulnerability ". Both primary and secondary schools are concerned.

International audience ; Education for human development within the constraints of sustainability is problematic for schools. On one hand, it is a political idea that continues to evolve with successive compromises between social groups with differing or even conflicting interests. ESD is therefore inherently 'non-disciplinary' and cannot be the basis of a single school subject if we wish to keep the creativity that results from the dynamics at work. On the other hand, SD leads us to think collectively about solutions that ensure a future of our choosing that preserves the biological capacity of the planet and to reduce our vulnerability. The sciences thus have a key role: their ability to question the world and to model the consequences of collective and individual choices. But there is a risk of technocratic drift and SD leads us to think about society's values and aims. A new link is established between sciences and humanities with a democratic model in sight. This paper presents what is possible out of the prospective scenarios method within general and compulsory education by seeking, through an empirical approach, to determine its feasibility, its contributions, its limits, and to locate the place of science education in the elaboration of the perception of " vulnerability ". Both primary and secondary schools are concerned.

International audience ; Education for human development within the constraints of sustainability is problematic for schools. On one hand, it is a political idea that continues to evolve with successive compromises between social groups with differing or even conflicting interests. ESD is therefore inherently 'non-disciplinary' and cannot be the basis of a single school subject if we wish to keep the creativity that results from the dynamics at work. On the other hand, SD leads us to think collectively about solutions that ensure a future of our choosing that preserves the biological capacity of the planet and to reduce our vulnerability. The sciences thus have a key role: their ability to question the world and to model the consequences of collective and individual choices. But there is a risk of technocratic drift and SD leads us to think about society's values and aims. A new link is established between sciences and humanities with a democratic model in sight. This paper presents what is possible out of the prospective scenarios method within general and compulsory education by seeking, through an empirical approach, to determine its feasibility, its contributions, its limits, and to locate the place of science education in the elaboration of the perception of " vulnerability ". Both primary and secondary schools are concerned.

International audience ; Education for human development within the constraints of sustainability is problematic for schools. On one hand, it is a political idea that continues to evolve with successive compromises between social groups with differing or even conflicting interests. ESD is therefore inherently 'non-disciplinary' and cannot be the basis of a single school subject if we wish to keep the creativity that results from the dynamics at work. On the other hand, SD leads us to think collectively about solutions that ensure a future of our choosing that preserves the biological capacity of the planet and to reduce our vulnerability. The sciences thus have a key role: their ability to question the world and to model the consequences of collective and individual choices. But there is a risk of technocratic drift and SD leads us to think about society's values and aims. A new link is established between sciences and humanities with a democratic model in sight. This paper presents what is possible out of the prospective scenarios method within general and compulsory education by seeking, through an empirical approach, to determine its feasibility, its contributions, its limits, and to locate the place of science education in the elaboration of the perception of " vulnerability ". Both primary and secondary schools are concerned.

International audience Education for human development within the constraints of sustainability is problematic for schools. On one hand, it is a political idea that continues to evolve with successive compromises between social groups with differing or even conflicting interests. ESD is therefore inherently 'non-disciplinary' and cannot be the basis of a single school subject if we wish to keep the creativity that results from the dynamics at work. On the other hand, SD leads us to think collectively about solutions that ensure a future of our choosing that preserves the biological capacity of the planet and to reduce our vulnerability. The sciences thus have a key role: their ability to question the world and to model the consequences of collective and individual choices. But there is a risk of technocratic drift and SD leads us to think about society's values and aims. A new link is established between sciences and humanities with a democratic model in sight. This paper presents what is possible out of the prospective scenarios method within general and compulsory education by seeking, through an empirical approach, to determine its feasibility, its contributions, its limits, and to locate the place of science education in the elaboration of the perception of " vulnerability ". Both primary and secondary schools are concerned.

International audience ; The article establishes the context of a new curricular construction, especially wich is the education for sustainable development (ESD). Building on a significant number of ESD research carried out in France, we establish a typology of postures of the researchers involved in this. This typology is constructed from a methodology based on occurrences of lexical frequencies of a bibliographic corpus coupled with a methodology of social representations of the researchers of this community. Six postures are built, which we named "acceptors", "descriptors / prescribers", "systemic", "controversy", "critical", "didactic". We postulate that these postures influence curriculum construction, questioning the social responsibility of educational researchers about an international political injunction. ; L'article pose le contexte de la construction curriculaire des « éducations à » en émergence depuis les années 80 en France au travers de celle, révélatrice, de l'éducation au développement durable (EDD). En nous appuyant sur un nombre significatif de travaux de recherche en EDD réalisés en France nous établissons une typologie des postures de chercheurs impliqués dans ces travaux. Cette typologie est construite à partir d'une méthodologie basée sur les fréquences d'occurrences lexicales sur un corpus bibliographique couplée à une méthodologie des représentations sociales des chercheurs de cette communauté. Six postures émergent, que nous avons nommé « les acceptants », « les descripteurs/prescripteurs de nouvelles procédures », « les systémiques », « les controverses », « les critiques », « les didactiques ». Nous postulons que ces postures influent sur les constructions curriculaires et posons le problème de la responsabilité sociale des chercheurs en éducation face aux injonctions politiques internationales.

International audience ; The article establishes the context of a new curricular construction, especially wich is the education for sustainable development (ESD). Building on a significant number of ESD research carried out in France, we establish a typology of postures of the researchers involved in this. This typology is constructed from a methodology based on occurrences of lexical frequencies of a bibliographic corpus coupled with a methodology of social representations of the researchers of this community. Six postures are built, which we named "acceptors", "descriptors / prescribers", "systemic", "controversy", "critical", "didactic". We postulate that these postures influence curriculum construction, questioning the social responsibility of educational researchers about an international political injunction. ; L'article pose le contexte de la construction curriculaire des « éducations à » en émergence depuis les années 80 en France au travers de celle, révélatrice, de l'éducation au développement durable (EDD). En nous appuyant sur un nombre significatif de travaux de recherche en EDD réalisés en France nous établissons une typologie des postures de chercheurs impliqués dans ces travaux. Cette typologie est construite à partir d'une méthodologie basée sur les fréquences d'occurrences lexicales sur un corpus bibliographique couplée à une méthodologie des représentations sociales des chercheurs de cette communauté. Six postures émergent, que nous avons nommé « les acceptants », « les descripteurs/prescripteurs de nouvelles procédures », « les systémiques », « les controverses », « les critiques », « les didactiques ». Nous postulons que ces postures influent sur les constructions curriculaires et posons le problème de la responsabilité sociale des chercheurs en éducation face aux injonctions politiques internationales.

International audience ; The article establishes the context of a new curricular construction, especially wich is the education for sustainable development (ESD). Building on a significant number of ESD research carried out in France, we establish a typology of postures of the researchers involved in this. This typology is constructed from a methodology based on occurrences of lexical frequencies of a bibliographic corpus coupled with a methodology of social representations of the researchers of this community. Six postures are built, which we named "acceptors", "descriptors / prescribers", "systemic", "controversy", "critical", "didactic". We postulate that these postures influence curriculum construction, questioning the social responsibility of educational researchers about an international political injunction. ; L'article pose le contexte de la construction curriculaire des « éducations à » en émergence depuis les années 80 en France au travers de celle, révélatrice, de l'éducation au développement durable (EDD). En nous appuyant sur un nombre significatif de travaux de recherche en EDD réalisés en France nous établissons une typologie des postures de chercheurs impliqués dans ces travaux. Cette typologie est construite à partir d'une méthodologie basée sur les fréquences d'occurrences lexicales sur un corpus bibliographique couplée à une méthodologie des représentations sociales des chercheurs de cette communauté. Six postures émergent, que nous avons nommé « les acceptants », « les descripteurs/prescripteurs de nouvelles procédures », « les systémiques », « les controverses », « les critiques », « les didactiques ». Nous postulons que ces postures influent sur les constructions curriculaires et posons le problème de la responsabilité sociale des chercheurs en éducation face aux injonctions politiques internationales.

International audience ; The article establishes the context of a new curricular construction, especially wich is the education for sustainable development (ESD). Building on a significant number of ESD research carried out in France, we establish a typology of postures of the researchers involved in this. This typology is constructed from a methodology based on occurrences of lexical frequencies of a bibliographic corpus coupled with a methodology of social representations of the researchers of this community. Six postures are built, which we named "acceptors", "descriptors / prescribers", "systemic", "controversy", "critical", "didactic". We postulate that these postures influence curriculum construction, questioning the social responsibility of educational researchers about an international political injunction. ; L'article pose le contexte de la construction curriculaire des « éducations à » en émergence depuis les années 80 en France au travers de celle, révélatrice, de l'éducation au développement durable (EDD). En nous appuyant sur un nombre significatif de travaux de recherche en EDD réalisés en France nous établissons une typologie des postures de chercheurs impliqués dans ces travaux. Cette typologie est construite à partir d'une méthodologie basée sur les fréquences d'occurrences lexicales sur un corpus bibliographique couplée à une méthodologie des représentations sociales des chercheurs de cette communauté. Six postures émergent, que nous avons nommé « les acceptants », « les descripteurs/prescripteurs de nouvelles procédures », « les systémiques », « les controverses », « les critiques », « les didactiques ». Nous postulons que ces postures influent sur les constructions curriculaires et posons le problème de la responsabilité sociale des chercheurs en éducation face aux injonctions politiques internationales.