Community-based tourism as a sustainable solution to maximise impacts locally? The Tsiseb Conservancy case, Namibia
In: Development Southern Africa, Band 27, Heft 5, S. 757-772
ISSN: 1470-3637
18 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Development Southern Africa, Band 27, Heft 5, S. 757-772
ISSN: 1470-3637
In: Mondes en développement, Band 136, Heft 4, S. 67
ISSN: 1782-1444
In: Mondes en développement, Band 34, Heft 34, S. 67-84
ISSN: 0302-3052
In: Mondes en développement, Band 34, Heft 136, S. 67-84
ISSN: 0302-3052
In: Conservation & society: an interdisciplinary journal exploring linkages between society, environment and development, Band 16, Heft 1, S. 91
ISSN: 0975-3133
In: Alternatives Économiques, Band 353, Heft 1, S. 63-63
In: Land use policy: the international journal covering all aspects of land use, Band 46, S. 283-291
ISSN: 0264-8377
Payments for Environmental Services (PES) are praised as innovative policy instruments and they influence the governance of forest restoration efforts in two major ways. The first is the establishment of multi-stakeholder agencies as intermediary bodies between funders and planters to manage the funds and to distribute incentives to planters. The second implication is that specific contracts assign objectives to land users in the form of conditions for payments that are believed to increase the chances for sustained impacts on the ground. These implications are important in the assessment of the potential of PES to operate as new and effective funding schemes for forest restoration. They are analyzed by looking at two prominent payments for watershed service programs in Indonesia—Cidanau (Banten province in Java) and West Lombok (Eastern Indonesia)—with combined economic and political science approaches. We derive lessons for the governance of funding efforts (e.g., multi-stakeholder agencies are not a guarantee of success; mixed results are obtained from a reliance on mandatory funding with ad hoc regulations, as opposed to voluntary contributions by the service beneficiary) and for the governance of financial expenditure (e.g., absolute need for evaluation procedures for the internal governance of farmer groups). Furthermore, we observe that these governance features provide no guarantee that restoration plots with the highest relevance for ecosystem services are targeted by the PES. ; ISSN:1999-4907
BASE
In: Afrique contemporaine: la revue de l'Afrique et du développement, Heft 2/222, S. 83-110
ISSN: 0002-0478
World Affairs Online
In: Afrique contemporaine: la revue de l'Afrique et du développement, Band 222, Heft 2, S. 83-110
ISSN: 1782-138X
Résumé L'écotourisme est de plus en plus prôné par les agences internationales et les gouvernements comme un modèle durable pour valoriser et conserver la riche biodiversité des pays du Sud et simultanément lutter contre la pauvreté rurale. Prenant l'exemple de Madagascar et de la Namibie, nous questionnons ce paradigme. En particulier, nous analysons les marges de manœuvre qu'il reste pour les régulations nationales et locales dans un contexte de développement sectoriel d'une filière touristique globalisée et contrôlée par les acteurs économiques du Nord (tour-opérateurs). Nous étudions ainsi les conditions actuelles de développement de l'écotourisme (appropriation des ressources naturelles, rôle des ONG, intégration dans la filière globale) et évaluons dans ce contexte, à l'aune de critères adaptés de ceux de l'Organisation mondiale du tourisme (OMT), les impacts de l'écotourisme dans les deux pays.
In: Afrique contemporaine: la revue de l'Afrique et du développement, Band 222, Heft 2, S. 83-111
ISSN: 0002-0478
In: Afrique contemporaine: la revue de l'Afrique et du développement, Band 46, Heft 222, S. 83-110
ISSN: 0002-0478
In: Environmental science & policy, Band 54, S. 483-486
ISSN: 1462-9011
Nouvelle version mise à jour en avril 2020. Titre de la première version : Forest spirits. What we know - and don't know - about the effectiveness of policies against deforestation [Mars 2019] ; Studies addressing the effectiveness of policies aiming at combatting deforestation have produced mixed results, showing no obvious and undebated correlations between a certain type of forest policy instrument and its success in preventing or deterring deforestation. Hence, why anti-deforestation policies succeed or not still remains unclear. This paper proposes a new reading grid of the effectiveness of anti-deforestation policies, by mapping the causal mechanisms at stake from its design to its objective of avoiding deforestation. 264 empirical evaluations are collected and reviewed in order to reveal the theory of change (ToC) that emerges from the current practice of forest policy evaluation. This mapping sheds light on the different causal steps necessary for anti-deforestation policies to be effective, and on the conditions at stake at the various stages of the causal chain, according to the existing literature. Doing so, it allows visualising the reasons for the success of anti-deforestation policies -or lack of, as per the literature corpus analysed. It also provides guidelines with regard to the elements of context to look at when designing and implementing such anti-deforestation policies. Finally, it exposes what is most researched by evaluators, as well as observes the main apparent evaluation blind spots.Our results highlight that the effectiveness of anti-deforestation policies is context-specific on political, economic, social, cultural, environmental and structural dimensions: The political willingness, the nature of available funding, the governance structure, the existence of forest-related traditions, the social and economic situation of local populations, and the nature and spatial scale of the deforestation drivers are elements that influence the success of the policy. They may play this role at ...
BASE
Nouvelle version mise à jour en avril 2020. Titre de la première version : Forest spirits. What we know - and don't know - about the effectiveness of policies against deforestation [Mars 2019] ; Studies addressing the effectiveness of policies aiming at combatting deforestation have produced mixed results, showing no obvious and undebated correlations between a certain type of forest policy instrument and its success in preventing or deterring deforestation. Hence, why anti-deforestation policies succeed or not still remains unclear. This paper proposes a new reading grid of the effectiveness of anti-deforestation policies, by mapping the causal mechanisms at stake from its design to its objective of avoiding deforestation. 264 empirical evaluations are collected and reviewed in order to reveal the theory of change (ToC) that emerges from the current practice of forest policy evaluation. This mapping sheds light on the different causal steps necessary for anti-deforestation policies to be effective, and on the conditions at stake at the various stages of the causal chain, according to the existing literature. Doing so, it allows visualising the reasons for the success of anti-deforestation policies -or lack of, as per the literature corpus analysed. It also provides guidelines with regard to the elements of context to look at when designing and implementing such anti-deforestation policies. Finally, it exposes what is most researched by evaluators, as well as observes the main apparent evaluation blind spots.Our results highlight that the effectiveness of anti-deforestation policies is context-specific on political, economic, social, cultural, environmental and structural dimensions: The political willingness, the nature of available funding, the governance structure, the existence of forest-related traditions, the social and economic situation of local populations, and the nature and spatial scale of the deforestation drivers are elements that influence the success of the policy. They may play this role at different stages of the policy design and implementation: at decision-making stage, during its implementation, or when evaluating its results and outcomes. The majority of conditions reported from the literature concern the implementation phase, at the local level. In other words, according to evaluators, the success or failure of anti-deforestation policies mostly lies in its effective implementation in the field, i.e. in its ability to generate a social acceptance of and compliance to the policy rules. However, some studies also show that a successfully implemented policy does not avoid deforestation if the actual deforestation driver is not properly addressed, thus resulting in deforestation being displaced or unchanged. This underlines the importance of prior risk assessments and field studies to design an adapted policy instrument to combat deforestation.
BASE