Suchergebnisse

Preliminary material /Hague Yearbook of International Law -- Hague Conference on Private International Law – Work in 2013 /Micah R. Thorner and Rosa Huizinga -- The Growing Rift between Africa and the International Criminal Court: The Curious (Im)possibility of a Security Council deferral /Abel S. Knottnerus -- Sexual Violence against Men in Armed Conflicts: Insights from International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia and the War Crimes Chamber of the State Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina /Ioannis P. Tzivaras -- Towards an Internet Framework Convention: The State of Play /Joanna Kulesza -- Sosa, Kiobel and Pirates Incorporated: Defining the 'Modern' Parameters of the Archaic Alien Tort Statute /Jonathan L.H. Blaine -- Responsibility for Crimes Committed by the Ottoman Empire against the Armenian Population: Are the Rules of State Succession to International Responsibility of Any Use? /Patrick Dumberry -- Unilateral Legal Acts Revisited: Common Law volume Civil Law Approaches and Lessons from the International Law Commission's (Failed) attempt to Codify Unilateral Acts of States /Eva Kassoti -- Interpreting Reasons: The Interpretation of the 1962 Temple of Preah Vihear Judgment /Daniel Peat -- The Development of International Law by the International Court of Justice /James Sloan and Christian J. Tams -- The Applicability of International Law Standards to the Sanctions of the Security Council /Adil Sahban -- Beyond Traditional Statehood Criteria: The Law and Contemporary Politics of State Creation /Ryal Wun -- Article 27 of the ICCPR Revisited – The Right to Culture as a Normative Source for Minority /Indigenous Participatory Claims in the Case Law of the Human Rights Committee /Athanasios Yupsanis -- Financial Market Dispute Settlement: Making Sense out of Current Nonsense /Jeffrey Golden -- The Margin of Appreciation in Investor-State Arbitration: The Prevalence and Desirability of Discretion and Deference /Jeanrique Fahner -- More in 2013 than Ever Before: Inter-State and Investor-State Arbitrations at the Permanent Court of Arbitration /Yanying Li and Camille M. Ng -- About the Editorial Board /Hague Yearbook of International Law -- About the AAA /Hague Yearbook of International Law -- Note from the Secretary-General of the AAA Note du Secrétaire général de l'AAA /Hague Yearbook of International Law.

Preliminary Material /Nikos Lavranos and Ruth Kok -- Private International Law sans frontières /Chris Thomale -- Hague Conference on Private International Law—Work in 2012 /Micah R. Thorner and Kay Jagath Rommerts -- Reflections on the Hague Conference on Private International Law at 140—20 Years Forward /Peter D. Trooboff and Frederike E.M. Stikkelbroeck -- Security Council Referrals to the ICC and EU Fundamental Rights: A Test for ECJ's Stance in Kadi I /Mihail Vatsov -- Declaratory Judgments of the International Court of Justice /Juliette McIntyre -- ARA Libertad from ITLOS: How Provisional a Provisional Measure Should Be? /Nuwan Peiris -- Le gel des avoirs d'une banque centrale étrangère comme réaction décentralisée à un fait internationalement illicite : rétorsion ou contre-mesure? /Emanuel Castellarin -- The Neer Rumour /Heather L. Bray -- The Permanent Court of Arbitration in 2012 /Yanying Li and Camille M. Ng -- Fostering Stability and Confidence in the Financial Markets— A Global Affair: P.R.I.M.E. Finance /Gerard J. Meijer and Camilla M.L. Perera-De Wit -- About the Editorial Board /Nikos Lavranos and Ruth Kok.

Preliminary Material /Nikos Lavranos and Ruth Kok -- The Hague Conference on Private International Law: Asser's Vision and an Evolving Mission /Hans van Loon -- Rediscovering the Public Dimension of Private International Law /Alex Mills -- Managing Legal Diversity – New Challenges for Private International Law /Aukje A.H. van Hoek -- Looking Forward in the Spirit of Asser: Identifying Developments in the Global Society that Need to Be Addressed in International Law /Hans Corell -- Hague Conference on Private International Law – Work in 2011 /Micah R. Thorner and Abigail Ludwig -- Enforceability of International Choice of Court Agreements: Impact of the Hague Convention on the US and EU Legal System /Nino Sievi -- International Law as a Legal Basis for Unilateral Humanitarian Intervention /Dovile Morkyte -- The Use of Force in International Law and the UN Security Council Resolutions 1970 and 1973 on Libya /Charles Riziki Majinge -- Self-defence and the International Court of Justice: A Review of Recent ICJ Case Law and Opinions Concerning Article 51 of the UN Charter /Elizabeth Campbell -- Terrorism and the Non-State Actor in the 2011 Interlocutory Decision of the Appeals Chamber of the Special Tribunal for Lebanon /Noemi Gal-Or -- Think Globally, Act Locally: Al-Jedda's Oscillation between the Coherence of International Law and Autonomy of the European Legal Order /Kushtrim Istrefi and Zane Ratniece -- L'Organisation internationale du Travail et le travail des enfants: à propos de la Convention n°182 sur les pires formes de travail des enfants /Mamoud Zani -- Member States' Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs): Lost in Transition? /Nikos Lavranos -- Umbrella Clauses and Their Policy Implications /Taida Begić Šarkinović -- Treaty Shopping Through Corporate Restructuring of Investments: Legitimate Corporate Planning or Abuse of Rights? /Yael Ribco Borman -- Review of a Foreign Arbitral Award by National Courts: A Comparative Study in Common Law and Civil Law Countries /Ihab Amro -- The Coherence of International Law: An Illustration by International Investment Law /Yannick Radi -- About the editorial board /Nikos Lavranos and Ruth Kok.

AbstractWith its Kadi-judgment, the European Court of Justice firmly rejected the Kadi/Yusuf-judgments of the Court of First Instance. The Court of Justice made unambiguously clear that Community law, in particular its basic, core fundamental rights values prevail over any international law obligations of the EC and its Member States, including UN Security Council Resolutions and the UN Charter. As a consequence thereof, individuals targeted by UN sanctions must have access to full judicial review in order to be able to ensure the effective protection of their fundamental rights, including procedural rights as guaranteed by the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR). As a result, the Court of Justice proved that the Community is indeed based on the rule of law and that the fight against terrorism – how important it may be – cannot be used as a justification for completely abrogating European constitutional law values as guaranteed within the Community and its Member States.