Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
Alternativ können Sie versuchen, selbst über Ihren lokalen Bibliothekskatalog auf das gewünschte Dokument zuzugreifen.
Bei Zugriffsproblemen kontaktieren Sie uns gern.
8 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Verfassung und Recht in Übersee: VRÜ = World comparative law : WCL, Band 31, Heft 1, S. 95-97
ISSN: 0506-7286
In: United States. Bureau of Foreign and Domestic Commerce. Trade information bulletin no. 668
In: United States. Bureau of Foreign and Domestic Commerce. Trade information bulletin no. 737
In: Dep. of Commerce, Bur. of Foreign and Dom. Commerce, Trade Information Bulletin 576
In: Politics, Groups, and Identities, Band 10, Heft 2, S. 254-275
ISSN: 2156-5511
In: European journal of international relations, Band 27, Heft 4, S. 1042-1066
ISSN: 1460-3713
Pundits, development practitioners, and scholars worry that rising populism and international disengagement in developed countries have negative consequences on foreign aid. However, how populism and foreign aid go together is not well understood. This paper provides the first systematic examination of this relationship. We adopt the popular ideational definition of populism, unpack populism into its core "thin" elements, and examine them within a delegation model of aid policy—a prominent framework in the aid literature. In so doing, we identify specific domestic political processes through which the core components of populism may affect aid spending. We argue that increases in one component of populism—anti-elitism—and in nativist sentiments, an associated concept, in a donor country lead to a reduction in aid spending through a public opinion channel. We supply both micro- and macro-evidence for our arguments by fielding surveys in the United States and United Kingdom as well as by analyzing aid spending by a large number of OECD donors. Our findings show that nativism and anti-elitism, rather than populism per se, influence not only individual attitudes toward aid but also actual aid policy and generate important insights into how to address populist challenges to foreign aid. Beyond these, our study contributes to the broader International Relations literature by demonstrating one useful analytical approach to studying populism, nativism, and foreign policy.
World Affairs Online