Balancing the Conspiracy's Books: Inter-Competitor Sales and Price-Fixing Cartels
In: Washington University Law Review, Band 96, Heft 1
17 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Washington University Law Review, Band 96, Heft 1
SSRN
In: Vanderbilt Law Review, Band 71, Heft 5
SSRN
The modern field of study into hindsight bias was launched by Baruch Fischhoff. Fischhoff provided his research subjects with a primer on the 1810s conflict between British forces and Nepalese Gurkhas near Northern India. He suggested four possible outcomes: British victory, Gurkha victory, a peace settlement, and a military stalemate with no peace settlement. The subjects were then divided into five groups. One group was given no information about the ultimate outcome of the conflict. Subjects in each of the remaining four groups were told that one of the four outcomes had, in fact, occurred. The subjects were then asked to assess the probability of each of the outcomes at the time that the conflict began. On average, the members of each group thought that the outcome that they had been told occurred was the most likely outcome a priori, even though they had been instructed to ignore what they "knew" about the ultimate outcome. Fischhoff referred to this phenomenon as "creeping determinism": the effect that being told "an outcome's occurrence consistently increases its perceived likelihood" before the fact. Subsequent studies confirmed his earlier results. Fischhoff's studies effectively created the field of research on hindsight bias.
BASE
SSRN
In: Minnesota Law Review, Band 101, Heft 4
SSRN
SSRN
SSRN
In: Southern California Law Review, Band 85, Heft 3
SSRN
In: Texas Law Review See Also, Band 92, S. 53-65
SSRN
In: Antitrust Law Journal, Band 79, Heft 3, S. 2014
SSRN
In: Boston College Law Review, Band 55
SSRN
In: William & Mary Law Review, Band 49, Heft 5
SSRN
In: Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 2578059
SSRN
In: Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 2532684
SSRN
Working paper
In: Iowa Law Review, Band 93, S. 1207
SSRN