Suchergebnisse

Implementation of Gampong Government as contained in Qanun Number 5 of 2003 Chapter 1 General Provisions Article 1 Point 6 is a legal community unit that has the lowest government organization directly under the Mukim, which occupies certain areas led by a keuchik or other name entitled to hold housing matters own stairs. In Points 9 and 10 also mentioned that the government is called the Gampong government is the administration of the gampong government and Tuha Peut Gampong. As for one of the main functions of the Tuha Peut Gampong as contained in Article 31 of Qanun Number 5 of 2003, namely carrying out the Budget Function. Namely the authority to discuss / formulate and approve the draft Village Budget and Revenue and Expenditure (APBG). This research uses normative juridical methods and Empirical Juridical This study uses normative legal research methods, viz. The study refers to the principles, legal concepts, legal norms contained in the Statutory Regulations. The role and responsibilities of the government of Babah Krueng Manggie Village are needed to support all forms of development activities. In practice, the role of Tuha Peut in the budget function has not yet run optimally because members of Tuha Peut do not understand their duties and functions. This is caused by a variety of factors, such as low levels of education as well as the lack of participation of the Tuha Peut Gampong, resulting in a non-optimal implementation of the budget function. Keywords: Tuha Peut; budget function; Gampong government

In the section weighing Qanun Aceh Number 11 of 2018 on Islamic Financial Institutions (LKS) states that the juridical reason of the establishment of Qanun LKS is a follow-up to the implementation of Article 21 Qanun Aceh Number 8 of 2014 on the Principals of Islamic Shari'ah. After the promulging of Qanun LKS, many Conventional Bank Financial Institutions in Aceh decided to close their business in Aceh, so that if people still want to use conventional bank services, then the transaction must be done outside Aceh. In fact, almost all business actors in Aceh's economic activities are connected to outside areas, while in outside areas many business actors, especially corporations, have not fully used the Shari'ah banking system. The formulation of the problems discussed in this study is: "Is the legal politics promulgated Qanun Aceh Number 11 of 2018 on Islamic Financial Institutions has been able to improve the economy in Aceh?". The research method used in this research is normative-empirical research on the implementation of normative law provisions (laws) in action on any particular legal event that occurs in a society with a Live Case Study approach, which is an approach to a legal event whose process is still ongoing or has not ended. The results showed that in practice Aceh's economic independence is still very low, in the case of business actors, many obstacles are experienced in the services of Islamic banks, including difficulty making transactions with partners from outside Aceh who generally use conventional bank accounts. The advice given in this study is that conventional financial institutions that have been established in Aceh in facilitating the transactions of business people in Aceh and to succeed financial institutions based on islamic sharia principles only need to open Sharia business units from their conventional financial institutions that have been formed, this is in accordance with the mandate of Article 21 Qanun Aceh Number 8 of 2014 on The Principals of Islamic Shari'ah which is the basis or juridical reason of the establishment of Qanun LKS so that for business actors who transact with business actors outside Aceh who predominantly have not used shari'ah financial institutions can be facilitated in conducting business transactions, so that this will have an final impact on improving the economy in Aceh.

Article 44 of the KuHP states that: "Confiscated objects are stored in state confiscation houses. In Article 1 number 3 of Government Regulation No. 27 of 1983 on the Implementation of Criminal Events Act also mentions that the State Confiscation House is hereby called RUPBASAN is the place of objects confiscated by the State for the purposes of judicial proceedings. RUPBASAN is where objects confiscated by the State for the purposes of judicial proceedings. RUPBASAN is established in every capital city or city district, and if necessary can be established RUPBASAN Branch. However, in practice not all district capitals or cities have RUPBASAN to manage confiscated objects and loot proceeds from crimes, so the management of the proceeds of crime is under direct management by the law enforcement agencies that handle such crimes. Based on the background as described above, the formulation of the problems in this study is: what are the arrangements regarding the management of Confiscated Objects in the RUPBASAN? And how is the management of Confiscated Goods and Proceeds of Looting Crimes in Indonesia? This research is a normative juridical study, namely research conducted by examining library materials or secondary data. The results showed the amount of assets or items seized from the defendant in criminal cases by law enforcement officers that were still not properly managed, meaning they had been confiscated or taken from the defendant, but were not properly managed. So far there has been an institution called RUPBASAN, as stipulated in Law No. 8 of 1981 on KUHAP, PP No. 27/1983 on The Implementation of KUHAP, and Regulation of the Minister of Justice Number: M.05.UM.01.06 of 1983 on the Management of Confiscated Goods and State Booty in the State Confiscation House, but not utilized properly. Confiscated items are all stored in the police station or prosecutor's office, whereas if stored and left unmanaged properly then there will be a decrease in value. Keywords: responsibilities of the RUPBASAN, confiscation objects, proceeds of crime

In the context of developing the Sabang Free Trade Zone and Free Port, it is necessary to revitalize the development of the Balohan Crossing Port of Sabang City. However, based on Article 11 PP Number 69 of 2001 concerning Ports, it is stated that the management of national, international ports and hub ports is left to BUMN, in this case PT. Indonesian Port (Pelindo). Whereas on the other hand, Law No. 32 of 2004 and Law No. 34 of 1999 indicates the transfer of authority from the central government to regional governments, including in terms of port management. The same is true in the context of Aceh's autonomy, based on Law No. 11 of 2006 concerning the Government of Aceh states that there is a surrender of wider authority to the regions to manage their own household affairs. The problem in this research is how is the authority to operate a port based on positive law in Indonesia? What is the authority for managing regional feeder ports in the context of Aceh's special autonomy? And what are the procedures for the utilization and management of the Balohan crossing port? The method used in this study is a nominative juridical research method. The results of the study showed that the authority to operate the port was technically regulated in Government Regulation No. 61 of 2009 concerning Ports. In the context of Aceh's special autonomy, Law No. 11 of 2006 concerning Aceh Government and PP No. 23 of 2015 concerning National Government Authority in Aceh in the context of Aceh's special autonomy, wasn't mentioned in detail regarding port management according to the type of hierarchy, but only mentioned regarding port management (in general) managed by BUMN in which the management is managed with the Aceh Government and / or Regency / City Government. Even though the Act and PP aren't mentioned in detail, the procedures for the utilization and management of the Balohan crossing port can be seen in the Minister of Transportation Decree Number KP. 432 of 2017 concerning the Establishment of a National Port Master Plan. The Ministry of Transportation stated that the Port of Balohan Sabang occupied the PL (Local Feed Port) hierarchy. This means that the Regency / City Government in Prov. Aceh has the authority to manage the Balohan Port in Sabang legally justified and allowed by law.Keywords: authority, management and development, balohan port

Human conflict with wildlife is a complex problem because it isn't only related to human safety but also with the safety of wildlife itself. Conflicts that have occurred have pushed the Government of Aceh, District/City Government and related parties to be more wise in understanding the lives of wild animals so that the handling and prevention measures can be optimized and based on the root of the problem. For this reason, a legal protection is needed in the form of a qanun which is expected to be able to integrate all available resources to protect wildlife in Aceh. The method of implementation in community service is to get involved with the expert team Commission II DPRA in drafting the Qanun of Wildlife Management until finally the qanun was ratified on 27 September 2019 and then promulgated to be Qanun on 29 October 2019. The participation of the authors in the drafting of the draft qanun of wildlife includes part of the process of forming the qanun, including starting from the stages of planning, drafting, and discussion. While the stages of ratification or stipulation, enactment and dissemination are carried out by the DPRA and the Government of Aceh itself in accordance with their respective duties, functions and authorities.

This study aims to determine the extent of Government Policy in Empowering the Economic Development of Coastal Communities in Johan Pahlawan District, West Aceh Regency. The method used is a qualitative approach with data collection techniques through observation, interviews and documentation. The results of the study show that government policies are: 1) People Centered (Human-Centered), Government policies related to human-centered community empowerment have been carried out by opening a network of cooperation in several places such as Sibolga, West Sumatra, Perlak to help fishermen to be able to export of fish, the policy provided is also not supported by administrative services from the sub-district. However, in terms of implementing decisions through the management of local resources by the ability of the fishing community itself, it is still very far from the expectations that have been targeted. 2) Participatory (Participatory), the fishermen community empowerment program during the COVID-19 pandemic is still not optimal in terms of community participation. This is evidenced from the results of the analysis which show that there are several government programs that do not involve the community to be involved in it, such as the Direct Cash Assistance (BLT) program, on the other hand the assistance provided by the government other than (BLT) in the form of fishing boats, fishing gear in the form of Physical assistance has also been provided. However, the government does not pay attention to the empowerment of the fishing community's capacity itself, and what is currently needed by the fishing community. 3) Sustainable, the form of policies that have been carried out by the government in empowering the community has been carried out such as the program for providing BLT to fishermen. However, this program is considered less than optimal because it is not sustainable and there is no definite time for distribution

AbstractHuman activities are inseparable from various risks, such as road activities that often cause accidents and deaths. Therefore the government established Law No. 33 and 34 of 1964 concerning liability for accident risk carried out by PT. Jasa Raharja . PT. Jasa Raharja is a state-owned enterprise (BUMN) that guarantees traffic accident insurance through compulsory contributions from passengers and mandatory donations from vehicle owners. But many people do not know yet, when an accident occurs the victims blame each other, burden each other or bear all the risks of the accident. Furthermore, many people do not yet clearly know the procedures, requirements and other provisions for obtaining accident compensation. PT. Jasa Raharja, representative of Meulaboh as the institution responsible for providing accident compensation, has carried out a coding program related to the delivery of information or the socialization of the insurance business. This service program was attended by 40 participants from State Administration Science Teuku Umar University students. This dedication targets all participants to understand the material well delivered and be able to be a liaison to the public related to accident recovery information.