Suchergebnisse

Purpose
This study aims to investigate the potential of an empathetic mindset aimed at empowering undergraduate students to work toward sustainable development (SD), addressing both theoretical and practical dimensions.


Design/methodology/approach
A mixed quantitative and qualitative research method was used in this study. Cross-sectional quantitative survey data on students' mindsets and actions toward SD was collected to examine the theoretical relationship between belief and behavior. Qualitative inquiry using focus-group interviews explored students' on-site learning experiences.


Findings
This study provides evidence for the impact of an empathetic mindset on education for sustainable development (ESD). Results showed that students with a more empathetic mindset showed better attitudes and behaviors toward SD actions. Findings suggest that developing an empathetic mindset improves students' attitudes toward taking substantial action to protect the environment.


Originality/value
This study introduces a novel perspective extending the application of empathetic mindset in ESD.

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to investigate students' understandings of ocean sustainability and the pedagogical influence of higher education on those conceptions.Design/methodology/approachThe conceptions of ocean sustainability of 54 university students of various academic disciplines enrolled in the 2014/2015 semester course "Sustainable Oceans" were assessed through use of auto-photography. Data were collected at the beginning and end of the course. Inter-rater reliability was measured by percentage of identical coding outcomes by two coders.FindingsAuto-photography is effective in assessing notions of sustainability. Social and economic dimensions were captured less frequently than environmental aspects in the students' photographs. Overall, students demonstrated vague perceptual awareness about who should take responsibility concerning lifeworld-related issues. Also, their perceptions were affected by their choice of academic discipline. Engaging students in inter-/transdisciplinary learning, integrating the arts, science and community, helped develop a more balanced, action-motivated conception of sustainability. Post-test patterns of change in students' vision and action were observed.Practical implicationsImplementing sustainability education in a university's coordinating bodies is effective in constructing a campus-based learning network, and participation in local community empowerment promotes a substantial and multidimensional concept of sustainability, and teaching material that includes content from the fine arts, literature or music stimulates students' awareness of, and sensitivity to, lifeworld issues.Originality/valueThis paper provides an innovative, auto-photography-based methodology, including an operational procedure, coding book and method of analysis, for assessing students' conceptions of sustainability. It also develops an interdisciplinary course that serves a "threshold" intervention role in ocean sustainability education.

Leading academic institutions, governments, and funders of research across the world have spent the last few decades fretting publicly about the need for scientists and research organisations to engage more widely with the public and be open about their research. While a global literature asserts that public communication has changed from a virtue to a duty for scientists in many countries and disciplines, our knowledge about what research institutions are doing and what factors drive their 'going public' is very limited. Here we present the first cross-national study of N = 2,030 research institutes within universities and large scientific organisations in Brazil, Germany, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, Portugal, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America. We find that institutes embrace communication with non-peers and do so through a variety of public events and traditional news media-less so through new media channels-and we find variation across countries and sciences, yet these are less evident than we expected. Country and disciplinary cultures contribute to the level of this communication, as do the resources that institutes make available for the effort; institutes with professionalised staff show higher activity online. Future research should examine whether a real change in the organisational culture is happening or whether this activity and resource allocation is merely a means to increase institutional visibility.