TRACY and SILENE Benchmark Phase II evaluation by TRACE code
In: Progress in nuclear energy: the international review journal covering all aspects of nuclear energy, Band 85, S. 71-82
ISSN: 0149-1970
12 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Progress in nuclear energy: the international review journal covering all aspects of nuclear energy, Band 85, S. 71-82
ISSN: 0149-1970
In: Progress in nuclear energy: the international review journal covering all aspects of nuclear energy, Band 114, S. 46-60
ISSN: 0149-1970
In: Progress in nuclear energy: the international review journal covering all aspects of nuclear energy, Band 80, S. 17-23
ISSN: 0149-1970
In: Progress in nuclear energy: the international review journal covering all aspects of nuclear energy, Band 50, Heft 2-6, S. 251-256
ISSN: 0149-1970
In: Progress in nuclear energy: the international review journal covering all aspects of nuclear energy, Band 109, S. 196-203
ISSN: 0149-1970
In: Progress in nuclear energy: the international review journal covering all aspects of nuclear energy, Band 87, S. 74-88
ISSN: 0149-1970
In: Science and technology of nuclear installations, Band 2017, S. 1-8
ISSN: 1687-6083
The in-house coupled neutronic and thermal-hydraulic (N/T-H) code of BATAN (National Nuclear Energy Agency of Indonesia), NODAL3, based on the few-group neutron diffusion equation in 3-dimensional geometry using the polynomial nodal method, has been verified with static and transient PWR benchmark cases. This paper reports the verification of NODAL3 code in the NEA-NSC PWR uncontrolled control rods withdrawal at zero power benchmark. The objective of this paper is to determine the accuracy of NODAL3 code in solving the continuously slow and fast reactivity insertions due to single and group of control rod bank withdrawn while the power and temperature increment are limited by the Doppler coefficient. The benchmark is chosen since many organizations participated using various methods and approximations, so the calculation results of NODAL3 can be compared to other codes' results. The calculated parameters are performed for the steady-state, transient core averaged, and transient hot pellet results. The influence of radial and axial nodes number was investigated for all cases. The results of NODAL3 code are in very good agreement with the reference solutions if the radial and axial nodes number is 2 × 2 and 2 × 18 (total axial layers), respectively.
In: Science and technology of nuclear installations, Band 2016, S. 1-11
ISSN: 1687-6083
This paper reports the results of sensitivity analysis of the multidimension, multigroup neutron diffusion NODAL3 code for the NEACRP 3D LWR core transient benchmarks (PWR). The code input parameters covered in the sensitivity analysis are the radial and axial node sizes (the number of radial node per fuel assembly and the number of axial layers), heat conduction node size in the fuel pellet and cladding, and the maximum time step. The output parameters considered in this analysis followed the above-mentioned core transient benchmarks, that is, power peak, time of power peak, power, averaged Doppler temperature, maximum fuel centerline temperature, and coolant outlet temperature at the end of simulation (5 s). The sensitivity analysis results showed that the radial node size and maximum time step give a significant effect on the transient parameters, especially the time of power peak, for the HZP and HFP conditions. The number of ring divisions for fuel pellet and cladding gives negligible effect on the transient solutions. For productive work of the PWR transient analysis, based on the present sensitivity analysis results, we recommend NODAL3 users to use2×2radial nodes per assembly,1×18axial layers per assembly, the maximum time step of 10 ms, and 9 and 1 ring divisions for fuel pellet and cladding, respectively.
In: Science and technology of nuclear installations, Band 2014, S. 1-9
ISSN: 1687-6083
A coupled neutronics thermal-hydraulics code NODAL3 has been developed based on the few-group neutron diffusion equation in 3-dimensional geometry for typical PWR static and transient analyses. The spatial variables are treated by using a polynomial nodal method while for the neutron dynamic solver the adiabatic and improved quasistatic methods are adopted. In this paper we report the benchmark calculation results of the code against the OECD/NEA CRP PWR rod ejection cases. The objective of this work is to determine the accuracy of NODAL3 code in analysing the reactivity initiated accident due to the control rod ejection. The NEACRP PWR rod ejection cases are chosen since many organizations participated in the NEA project using various methods as well as approximations, so that, in addition to the reference solutions, the calculation results of NODAL3 code can also be compared to other codes' results. The transient parameters to be verified are time of power peak, power peak, final power, final average Doppler temperature, maximum fuel temperature, and final coolant temperature. The results of NODAL3 code agree well with the PHANTHER reference solutions in 1993 and 1997 (revised). Comparison with other validated codes, DYN3D/R and ANCK, shows also a satisfactory agreement.
In: Progress in nuclear energy: the international review journal covering all aspects of nuclear energy, Band 50, Heft 2-6, S. 290-294
ISSN: 0149-1970
In: Progress in nuclear energy: the international review journal covering all aspects of nuclear energy, Band 156, S. 104552
ISSN: 0149-1970
In: Progress in nuclear energy: the international review journal covering all aspects of nuclear energy, Band 82, S. 191-196
ISSN: 0149-1970