A Hedonic Analysis of Fresh Tomato Prices among Regional Markets
In: Review of agricultural economics: RAE, Band 29, Heft 4, S. 783-800
ISSN: 1467-9353
13 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Review of agricultural economics: RAE, Band 29, Heft 4, S. 783-800
ISSN: 1467-9353
In: American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Band 88, Heft 3, S. 742-749
SSRN
In: Oxford Agrarian Studies, Band 20, Heft 2, S. 89-105
In: USDA-ERS Economic Research Report No. 100
SSRN
Working paper
In: American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Band 85, Heft 2, S. 458-478
SSRN
In: American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Band 96, Heft 3, S. 769-789
SSRN
In: Social science journal: official journal of the Western Social Science Association, Band 47, Heft 2, S. 372-391
ISSN: 0362-3319
In: Review of agricultural economics: RAE, Band 17, Heft 2, S. 159
ISSN: 1467-9353
In: Journal of policy modeling: JPMOD ; a social science forum of world issues, Band 36, Heft 5, S. 938-952
ISSN: 0161-8938
In: Journal of policy modeling: JPMOD ; a social science forum of world issues, Band 36, Heft 5, S. 938-952
ISSN: 0161-8938
In: Contemporary economic policy: a journal of Western Economic Association International, Band 28, Heft 4, S. 524-536
ISSN: 1465-7287
Most Americans need to consume more fruits, vegetables, and dairy products. This need is particularly acute among low‐income individuals. This study examines the cost‐effectiveness of two economic policies that use alternative policy levers available within the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (formerly Food Stamp Program) to increase consumption of these under‐consumed foods. Data from three nationally representative surveys are used to estimate demand elasticities, marginal propensity to spend on food out of food stamp benefits, and consumption amount of and spending on under‐consumed foods among food stamp recipients. Results suggest that a 10% price subsidy would curtail consumption deficiencies by 4%–7% at an estimated cost of $734 million a year. When the same $734 million is used to finance food stamp benefits, consumption deficiencies are predicted to narrow by only 0.35%–0.40%. (JEL C34, D12, Q18)
In: Contemporary Economic Policy, Band 28, Heft 4, S. 524-536
SSRN
In: American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Band 81, Heft 2, S. 373-384
SSRN